This post did not contain any content.

[saupreiss@pfalz.social]

@rbreich

And now Imagine how the lower 50% of Americans are on a global scale.

[ggmcbg@mstdn.plus]

@rbreich

You can't even buy a decent eating utensil set for $4.27.

Oh, well. Machetes and pitchforks it is instead.

[darkphoenix@universeodon.com]

@rbreich and with all the kickbacks and cheating and lying, it's not like ANY of them ACTUALLY EARNED their billions, they stole that money from us, and our children.

[facebita@mastodon.glombit.de]

@rbreich No. The Problem is not the concentration of wealth. The problem is only that wealth enables political influence and power. If politicians and – at first – efficient legalization would resist and limit the power of the money wealth would be nice but not dangerous.

[alpacamale@social.cologne]

@rbreich This level of wealth is a socio-economic weapon of mass destruction.

[waimeafalls@ohai.social]

@rbreich "Eat the rich" means we STILL go hungry!

[curiousicae@tech.lgbt]

@rbreich
Since – as we all know – all humans are, of course, created equally and no human shall ever be considered more worthy than any any other human:
If the top 400 USian humans are collectively “worth” $8 trillion, then we can follow follow the bottom 150'000'000 (~50%) USian humans have to hence be “worth” exactly $3 septillion.

Should any actually measured numbers not match the observation then we may safely follow that they must have been derived from bad data, as any other outcome would suggest that maybe some humans are actually worth less than others and that obviously cannot be true!

[bici@mastodon.social]

@rbreich

what will lead to Bastille July 14, 1789 v2?

[cautioustinker@social.linux.pizza]

@rbreich versus the top being?

[cautioustinker@social.linux.pizza]

@crystalmoon @rbreich why would ordinary citizens move to Bermuda? It’s expensive there, and there’s more people in the bottom 50% than top.