Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I feel like no one appreciated what actually happened today at work.

I feel like no one appreciated what actually happened today at work.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
2 Indlæg 2 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • rune@social.sound-city.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
    rune@social.sound-city.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
    rune@social.sound-city.dk
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    I feel like no one appreciated what actually happened today at work.

    One colleague asked in our common channel for review of a merge request, it's pretty much taken for granted that he used claude to write it, so reviewed it superficially and said "LGTM" before another colleague joined the thread and asked if he could copy paste the code into claude and have it review it...

    Now, it's a sane enough question in context of our rules blocking using LLMs on this repository in general, but it is allowed on a single non-confidential file.

    That's not what blows my mind. What blows my mind is that one claude user asked another claude user to review his claude slop and got a claude review back?? Like, just ask claude yourself if that's an acceptable review?? I'm genuinely so taken aback by this interaction and no one else reacted to it.

    reynir@social.data.coopR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rune@social.sound-city.dkR rune@social.sound-city.dk

      I feel like no one appreciated what actually happened today at work.

      One colleague asked in our common channel for review of a merge request, it's pretty much taken for granted that he used claude to write it, so reviewed it superficially and said "LGTM" before another colleague joined the thread and asked if he could copy paste the code into claude and have it review it...

      Now, it's a sane enough question in context of our rules blocking using LLMs on this repository in general, but it is allowed on a single non-confidential file.

      That's not what blows my mind. What blows my mind is that one claude user asked another claude user to review his claude slop and got a claude review back?? Like, just ask claude yourself if that's an acceptable review?? I'm genuinely so taken aback by this interaction and no one else reacted to it.

      reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
      reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
      reynir@social.data.coop
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @rune Claude talking to Claude via two meat proxies. There must be a word for this.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Svar
      • Svar som emne
      Login for at svare
      • Ældste til nyeste
      • Nyeste til ældste
      • Most Votes


      • Log ind

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      Graciously hosted by data.coop
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Hjem
      • Seneste
      • Etiketter
      • Populære
      • Verden
      • Bruger
      • Grupper