Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Right about now, American allies are considering letting America go it alone in the Middle East.

Right about now, American allies are considering letting America go it alone in the Middle East.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
iranillegalwarcrimestrumpcongress
15 Indlæg 11 Posters 18 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • hamonwry@mastodon.worldH hamonwry@mastodon.world

    Right about now, American allies are considering letting America go it alone in the Middle East.

    Without the approval of Congress and the American people Operation Distract From Epstein is illegal, making Trump a war criminal.

    #iran #illegal #warcrimes
    #trump #congress #democrats #republicans #Israel #epstein #EpsteinFiles #news #worldnews

    darthastrius@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    darthastrius@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    darthastrius@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @HamonWry Obama, Bush, Biden, Trump. Makes four war criminals in a row!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hamonwry@mastodon.worldH hamonwry@mastodon.world

      Right about now, American allies are considering letting America go it alone in the Middle East.

      Without the approval of Congress and the American people Operation Distract From Epstein is illegal, making Trump a war criminal.

      #iran #illegal #warcrimes
      #trump #congress #democrats #republicans #Israel #epstein #EpsteinFiles #news #worldnews

      htpcnz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      htpcnz@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      htpcnz@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @HamonWry alone?. Canada, Britain, France and Australia have all said they support what US is doing, never thought anyone rally that fast to get in line behind a pedo before, but here we are.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hamonwry@mastodon.worldH hamonwry@mastodon.world

        Right about now, American allies are considering letting America go it alone in the Middle East.

        Without the approval of Congress and the American people Operation Distract From Epstein is illegal, making Trump a war criminal.

        #iran #illegal #warcrimes
        #trump #congress #democrats #republicans #Israel #epstein #EpsteinFiles #news #worldnews

        oscarfalcon@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        oscarfalcon@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        oscarfalcon@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @HamonWry

        And yet: nothing! no prosecutions, no deposing, no sanctions, no arrests, no jail no nothing... NOTHING!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

          @HamonWry To be fair, the attack against Venezuela was also illegal as are the military assaults of civilian vessels in the seas. And, well, a bunch of other things the regime has ordered.

          But I guess this is as official as it gets in regards to war crimes.

          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nu
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @nazokiyoubinbou @HamonWry As we have learned, "illegal" and "war crimes" don't really mean anything. The generals getting these these illegal orders still carry them out. The officers below them carry them out. The soldiers carry them out. Every single one of them is enabling Trump.

          If no one in the chain of command does anything different depending on if Congress has approved the war or not, what is the meaning of "approval of Congress"?

          nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

            @nazokiyoubinbou @HamonWry As we have learned, "illegal" and "war crimes" don't really mean anything. The generals getting these these illegal orders still carry them out. The officers below them carry them out. The soldiers carry them out. Every single one of them is enabling Trump.

            If no one in the chain of command does anything different depending on if Congress has approved the war or not, what is the meaning of "approval of Congress"?

            nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @ahltorp @HamonWry Although the difference may only be on paper, legal and illegal still *mean* something and I will continue to use the phrasing that is specifically meant to remind people that they cannot legally do what they're doing and if law ever returns to America they deserve to stand trial in a Nuremberg trial kind of way and be punished appropriately.

            ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

              @ahltorp @HamonWry Although the difference may only be on paper, legal and illegal still *mean* something and I will continue to use the phrasing that is specifically meant to remind people that they cannot legally do what they're doing and if law ever returns to America they deserve to stand trial in a Nuremberg trial kind of way and be punished appropriately.

              ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahltorp@mastodon.nu
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @nazokiyoubinbou @HamonWry Even if enforcement was perfect, "illegal" is still within a legal system, with laws that may be extremely unjust. Slavery was legal in the US until not very long ago.

              And punishing people after the fact is all well and good, but a legal system that only punishes and doesn't stop things from happening isn't worth much. The people killed won't be un-killed by punishing the perpetrators. Their erased culture won't be restored.

              nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                @nazokiyoubinbou @HamonWry Even if enforcement was perfect, "illegal" is still within a legal system, with laws that may be extremely unjust. Slavery was legal in the US until not very long ago.

                And punishing people after the fact is all well and good, but a legal system that only punishes and doesn't stop things from happening isn't worth much. The people killed won't be un-killed by punishing the perpetrators. Their erased culture won't be restored.

                nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @ahltorp @HamonWry You're arguing reverse semantics here...

                I'm calling it illegal not just because it is illegal within the law, but to emphasize to the reader/listener that this is an act that cannot be abided.

                It also wildly diverts the entire topic and completely misses some pretty important points.

                Let's discuss semantics later about a different topic where war criminals aren't issuing orders to kill people.

                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

                  @ahltorp @HamonWry You're arguing reverse semantics here...

                  I'm calling it illegal not just because it is illegal within the law, but to emphasize to the reader/listener that this is an act that cannot be abided.

                  It also wildly diverts the entire topic and completely misses some pretty important points.

                  Let's discuss semantics later about a different topic where war criminals aren't issuing orders to kill people.

                  ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @nazokiyoubinbou I don't agree that the question of "illegal" diverts, but let's leave it there for now.

                  What then about my second point, that punishment can never be a substitute for prevention? The focus *has* to be on prevention. I would even argue that talking about future punishment is a diversion. We can worry about that when the time comes.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kali@discuss.systemsK kali@discuss.systems

                    @HamonWry you have no allies.

                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bweller@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @kali ☝️

                    @HamonWry

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kali@discuss.systemsK kali@discuss.systems

                      @HamonWry you have no allies.

                      everton137@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                      everton137@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                      everton137@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @kali @HamonWry he meant 'former allies'.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper