Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. New blog post: Why "digital sovereignty" requires a free software alternative to Android and iOS, and how we're building towards that 🏗️

New blog post: Why "digital sovereignty" requires a free software alternative to Android and iOS, and how we're building towards that 🏗️

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
22 Indlæg 13 Posters 21 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • luana@wetdry.worldL luana@wetdry.world

    @modal ugh I wish so fucking bad this didn’t have gnome propaganda embedded into it

    anatolegc@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
    anatolegc@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
    anatolegc@piaille.fr
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #13

    @luana @modal why don’t you like gnome?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

      @f_underscore @modal

      Open source hardware is in my opinion a pipe dream in a world that moves as fast as the mobile devices do at the moment.

      I really can't see anyone spend millions on developing hardware and the give it away for free, and I definitely can't see a group of open source developers with limited funding keep up with the current development speed of new mobile hardware.

      I think that requiring a common, open platform is probably the best way forward at the moment. That will allow companies to develop new hardware and make money on their investment, while allowing end-users to install the operating system of their choice, just like on a PC.

      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      f_underscore@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #14

      @madsenandersc @modal Fair enough, I personally see it as a pipe dream that the powers that be will do anything for the common good, the same people who are now proposing chat control and mandatory ID verifications to "protect the children".
      1/2

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

        @f_underscore @modal

        Open source hardware is in my opinion a pipe dream in a world that moves as fast as the mobile devices do at the moment.

        I really can't see anyone spend millions on developing hardware and the give it away for free, and I definitely can't see a group of open source developers with limited funding keep up with the current development speed of new mobile hardware.

        I think that requiring a common, open platform is probably the best way forward at the moment. That will allow companies to develop new hardware and make money on their investment, while allowing end-users to install the operating system of their choice, just like on a PC.

        F This user is from outside of this forum
        F This user is from outside of this forum
        f_underscore@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #15

        @madsenandersc @modal
        Open source hardware already exists, with examples like the Purism #Librem5 and the #MNT computers. I'm sure MNT profits and I love their business model. They have designed a flexible PCB that uses an adapter board and as such you can easily swap the processor for another one.
        These devices might not have the latest and greatest in hardware, but they work. I have a lot of faith in the upcoing MNT Reform Touch as a platform for Mobile Linux.
        2/2

        madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F f_underscore@mastodon.social

          @madsenandersc @modal
          Open source hardware already exists, with examples like the Purism #Librem5 and the #MNT computers. I'm sure MNT profits and I love their business model. They have designed a flexible PCB that uses an adapter board and as such you can easily swap the processor for another one.
          These devices might not have the latest and greatest in hardware, but they work. I have a lot of faith in the upcoing MNT Reform Touch as a platform for Mobile Linux.
          2/2

          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #16

          @f_underscore @modal
          No offense, but Purism Librem 5 stands absolutely no chance with an ordinary consumer.

          799 USD for a phone with specs like the Motorola e14 (and that is even being generous) simply has no place in the market. Without a compelling reason, consumers will not even give it a second look.

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

            @f_underscore @modal
            No offense, but Purism Librem 5 stands absolutely no chance with an ordinary consumer.

            799 USD for a phone with specs like the Motorola e14 (and that is even being generous) simply has no place in the market. Without a compelling reason, consumers will not even give it a second look.

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            f_underscore@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #17

            @madsenandersc @modal Yeah, I fully agree, I was mostly citing the Librem5 exists. I have hopes for the MNT reform touch, but that too will be limited spec wise. But it is something and is based on more recent hardware like the RK3588.
            It's got mostly the same components as the #MNT Pocket Reform, which is a real product.

            janvlug@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • luana@wetdry.worldL luana@wetdry.world

              @modal ugh I wish so fucking bad this didn’t have gnome propaganda embedded into it

              afranke@mamot.frA This user is from outside of this forum
              afranke@mamot.frA This user is from outside of this forum
              afranke@mamot.fr
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #18

              @luana
              Oh no, people who’ve been involved with GNOME for years advocate for GNOME. What a shocker.
              @modal

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F f_underscore@mastodon.social

                @madsenandersc @modal Yeah, I fully agree, I was mostly citing the Librem5 exists. I have hopes for the MNT reform touch, but that too will be limited spec wise. But it is something and is based on more recent hardware like the RK3588.
                It's got mostly the same components as the #MNT Pocket Reform, which is a real product.

                janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janvlug@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #19

                @f_underscore @madsenandersc @modal

                For average consumers the #Librem5 will be inconvenient compared to modern Android or Apple phones.

                But there are also people (like me) who have some tolerance for inconvenience to gain freedom and independence from #bigtech.

                I'm using my Librem 5 as my daily phone. The operating system will soon get an upgrade.

                By buying a Librem 5 one could support the development of #Linux phones.

                #MobileLinux

                madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

                  @f_underscore @modal

                  Open source hardware is in my opinion a pipe dream in a world that moves as fast as the mobile devices do at the moment.

                  I really can't see anyone spend millions on developing hardware and the give it away for free, and I definitely can't see a group of open source developers with limited funding keep up with the current development speed of new mobile hardware.

                  I think that requiring a common, open platform is probably the best way forward at the moment. That will allow companies to develop new hardware and make money on their investment, while allowing end-users to install the operating system of their choice, just like on a PC.

                  chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nlC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nlC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nl
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #20

                  @madsenandersc

                  There's lots of Open Source hardware already.
                  And Open Source doesn't mean 'free of charge'
                  Far from complete list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_hardware_projects

                  @f_underscore @modal

                  madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nlC chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nl

                    @madsenandersc

                    There's lots of Open Source hardware already.
                    And Open Source doesn't mean 'free of charge'
                    Far from complete list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_hardware_projects

                    @f_underscore @modal

                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #21

                    @chasalin @f_underscore @modal

                    The problem is not if it is available - the problem is, if it has any place whatsoever in the market, outside of a few enthusiasts.

                    There are people buying a Morgan car today, but they are so few and far between, that the car in itself has no impact on the market or the world at all.

                    Having a mobile phone with open source hardware is irrelevant if it is so expensive that only a few people can - or will - buy it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • janvlug@mastodon.socialJ janvlug@mastodon.social

                      @f_underscore @madsenandersc @modal

                      For average consumers the #Librem5 will be inconvenient compared to modern Android or Apple phones.

                      But there are also people (like me) who have some tolerance for inconvenience to gain freedom and independence from #bigtech.

                      I'm using my Librem 5 as my daily phone. The operating system will soon get an upgrade.

                      By buying a Librem 5 one could support the development of #Linux phones.

                      #MobileLinux

                      madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                      madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                      madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #22

                      @janvlug @f_underscore @modal

                      That is really fine, and all the more power to you (and no sarcasm intended at all - I really mean it).

                      However, it does not change the fact that we cannot let "digital sovereignty" wait for open source hardware (that is where the discussion started), and that is why I called it a pipe dream. It is simply to far into the future at this point.

                      And yes, I was not clear enough in my language. It is not that open source hardware cannot happen, it is that it cannot be the path forward to digital sovereignty.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper