Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The day is over and I didn’t get as much done as I’d have liked.

The day is over and I didn’t get as much done as I’d have liked.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
36 Indlæg 19 Posters 136 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

    In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

    Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

    This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

    https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

    muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    muzicofiel@mastodon.nl
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #19

    @EUCommission @HennaVirkkunen Stop this #bigtech lobby firms in #brussel #EU

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • disreputable_craftsman@mastodon.socialD disreputable_craftsman@mastodon.social

      @diemkay @oscarfalcon plenty of alternatives BUT eventually still a big problem: even if we don't use gmail, as most of the people do, our mails are still analysed by Gggle... it is pratically impossible to ditch whtspp, eveybody use it, even for work related purposes. In the people surrounding me I really can't say awareness is growing, they still don't give a fuck.

      oscarfalcon@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      oscarfalcon@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      oscarfalcon@mastodon.social
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #20

      @Disreputable_Craftsman @diemkay

      Have a similar situation where I tried to get my aviation crew into signal and they all refused (or looked at me in that strange way people do when they don't want to try something new). I am on signal but using meta's app is becoming harder and harder every day.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

        In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

        Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

        This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

        https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

        rrustema@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rrustema@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rrustema@mastodon.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #21

        @diemkay €49 million is a lot of money but not in relation to what they get for it. Value for money.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic on
        • feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place

          @zbrando @diemkay OK, but what exactly is "lobbing" and what exactly is "target advertising"?

          diemkay@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          diemkay@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          diemkay@hachyderm.io
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #22

          @feyter @zbrando I'm going to assume this is a question in good faith, so the answer is:

          Lobbying - the act of trying to exert influence upon politicians to change their minds one way or another. Corporate Europe Observatory have explainers on this, you can find them and watch them. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/02/new-video-series

          "Lobbing" was a typo.

          Targeted advertising is how most scams in Europe operate, and how organized crime make huge profits, be it on Facebook, Google or TikTok. You can read up more here as a general overview: https://proton.me/blog/meta-scam-ads

          The scale of scams is now so big that every European country reports thousands of these cases per week, so it's likely you know people who've fallen prey to a scam. Targeted ads is how they get scammed. Depending on how deep you want to go, here's another overview: https://www.investigate-europe.eu/posts/investment-scammers-slip-through-cracks-in-eu-big-tech-law

          zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

            In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

            Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

            This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

            https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

            inchulk@mastodon.greenI This user is from outside of this forum
            inchulk@mastodon.greenI This user is from outside of this forum
            inchulk@mastodon.green
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #23

            @diemkay Their lobbying in the USA is a lot bigger (donations to the king are BIG). Russia also has a lot of effect in lobbying, and probably China too. Don’t forget the NGOs who also lobby very strongly, with probably more impact on EU food and environment law than the big tech.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

              @feyter @zbrando I'm going to assume this is a question in good faith, so the answer is:

              Lobbying - the act of trying to exert influence upon politicians to change their minds one way or another. Corporate Europe Observatory have explainers on this, you can find them and watch them. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/02/new-video-series

              "Lobbing" was a typo.

              Targeted advertising is how most scams in Europe operate, and how organized crime make huge profits, be it on Facebook, Google or TikTok. You can read up more here as a general overview: https://proton.me/blog/meta-scam-ads

              The scale of scams is now so big that every European country reports thousands of these cases per week, so it's likely you know people who've fallen prey to a scam. Targeted ads is how they get scammed. Depending on how deep you want to go, here's another overview: https://www.investigate-europe.eu/posts/investment-scammers-slip-through-cracks-in-eu-big-tech-law

              zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zbrando@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #24

              @diemkay @feyter Thank you for the explanations and corrections, English is not my mother language. 😬

              diemkay@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ zbrando@social.vivaldi.net

                @diemkay @feyter Thank you for the explanations and corrections, English is not my mother language. 😬

                diemkay@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                diemkay@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                diemkay@hachyderm.io
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #25

                @zbrando that’s alright, you are absolutely correct though. Dozens of investigations link the targeted ads to organized crime and Meta profits off them handsomely, so getting rid of them would be a great start

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

                  @feyter @zbrando I'm going to assume this is a question in good faith, so the answer is:

                  Lobbying - the act of trying to exert influence upon politicians to change their minds one way or another. Corporate Europe Observatory have explainers on this, you can find them and watch them. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/02/new-video-series

                  "Lobbing" was a typo.

                  Targeted advertising is how most scams in Europe operate, and how organized crime make huge profits, be it on Facebook, Google or TikTok. You can read up more here as a general overview: https://proton.me/blog/meta-scam-ads

                  The scale of scams is now so big that every European country reports thousands of these cases per week, so it's likely you know people who've fallen prey to a scam. Targeted ads is how they get scammed. Depending on how deep you want to go, here's another overview: https://www.investigate-europe.eu/posts/investment-scammers-slip-through-cracks-in-eu-big-tech-law

                  feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                  feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                  feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  @diemkay @zbrando It is in good faith, but my intention was to step back for a second and think about what was actually said here. Because we need a common ground first.

                  feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                    @diemkay @zbrando It is in good faith, but my intention was to step back for a second and think about what was actually said here. Because we need a common ground first.

                    feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    @diemkay @zbrando If human right organizations are trying to influence political agenda, its lobbying to. Every advertisement is done to address a target audience.

                    "Just banning this" is quite impossible, if it is so fuzzy that actually everting can be seen as such. So " just do simple thing X" to "solve complex Problem Y", doesn't seam to be a good approach for me.

                    We should keep that in mind, even if we all want to archive something good here. Demanding more transparency could be a start.

                    zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @diemkay @zbrando If human right organizations are trying to influence political agenda, its lobbying to. Every advertisement is done to address a target audience.

                      "Just banning this" is quite impossible, if it is so fuzzy that actually everting can be seen as such. So " just do simple thing X" to "solve complex Problem Y", doesn't seam to be a good approach for me.

                      We should keep that in mind, even if we all want to archive something good here. Demanding more transparency could be a start.

                      zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zbrando@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      @feyter
                      In my opinion there is a big difference between a human right association asking for talks about a subject/law and a corporation paying to have an economic advantage.
                      About target advertising: it is used to uncover people identities and target them with malware or offer them worst deals. And the corps don't give a shit about security because they don't have consequences. It can be easily banned by substituting it with context advertising.
                      @diemkay

                      feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ zbrando@social.vivaldi.net

                        @feyter
                        In my opinion there is a big difference between a human right association asking for talks about a subject/law and a corporation paying to have an economic advantage.
                        About target advertising: it is used to uncover people identities and target them with malware or offer them worst deals. And the corps don't give a shit about security because they don't have consequences. It can be easily banned by substituting it with context advertising.
                        @diemkay

                        feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                        feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                        feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #29

                        @zbrando @diemkay the reality isn't so simple. Sometimes giving certain business an advantage is actually the right thing to do, because "free markets" is an illusion. We wouldn't have the renewable energy technology that we have now, if it wound be heavily supported on a political level in the past.

                        So maybe you mean it should be unlawful to do unethically things... but that's impossible to define. It's a complex problem. People should not expact easy fixes or they will be disappointed.

                        zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                          @zbrando @diemkay the reality isn't so simple. Sometimes giving certain business an advantage is actually the right thing to do, because "free markets" is an illusion. We wouldn't have the renewable energy technology that we have now, if it wound be heavily supported on a political level in the past.

                          So maybe you mean it should be unlawful to do unethically things... but that's impossible to define. It's a complex problem. People should not expact easy fixes or they will be disappointed.

                          zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zbrando@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #30

                          @feyter
                          To me you are making a simple situation complex: if the advertising technology is used intentionally by most actors to identify people, follow them and feed them with scams then said technology should be banned.
                          And you are complicating again in the field of lobbying: if a state actor wants to push a business because it's convenient it has all the instruments to do it. Lobbying is for businesses to push their agenda for their advantage.

                          feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ zbrando@social.vivaldi.net

                            @feyter
                            To me you are making a simple situation complex: if the advertising technology is used intentionally by most actors to identify people, follow them and feed them with scams then said technology should be banned.
                            And you are complicating again in the field of lobbying: if a state actor wants to push a business because it's convenient it has all the instruments to do it. Lobbying is for businesses to push their agenda for their advantage.

                            feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                            feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF This user is from outside of this forum
                            feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #31

                            @zbrando and how should a state actor know about what business need support and are worth supporting? Only because interest groups are coming to them and describing the situations and pointing on problems that exist. This is actually how politics is made.

                            For targeting, I think outlawing what information can be collected and can be shared with other + instruments to check this + punishment that actually hurt sounds more realistic for me. EU GDPR was a good step into the right direction.

                            zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • feyter@mastodon.gamedev.placeF feyter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                              @zbrando and how should a state actor know about what business need support and are worth supporting? Only because interest groups are coming to them and describing the situations and pointing on problems that exist. This is actually how politics is made.

                              For targeting, I think outlawing what information can be collected and can be shared with other + instruments to check this + punishment that actually hurt sounds more realistic for me. EU GDPR was a good step into the right direction.

                              zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zbrando@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #32

                              @feyter What you described is how things SHOULD work (businesses and the state talking); instead single corps or groups push THEIR agenda by bribing public officials. So the money (and the corps) drives the public agenda and not the state.

                              Advertising corps need all kinds of information to find the precise target customer, it's like targeted advertising works (while context advertising uses only the content you are seeing to serve you ads). So the only solution IMO is to outlaw targeted advertising. You can obtain something similar in countries with the GDPR by allowing only technically necessary cookies (no legitimate interest allowed) but even with this solution corps can fingerprint you with other techniques with enough data.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

                                In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

                                Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

                                This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

                                https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

                                karelbrits@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                karelbrits@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                karelbrits@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #33

                                @diemkay any comments, @EUCommission ?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

                                  In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

                                  Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

                                  This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

                                  https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

                                  tonemath@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tonemath@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tonemath@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #34

                                  @diemkay Is there an organized initiative somewhere that we can support to stop it?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

                                    In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

                                    Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

                                    This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

                                    https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

                                    seachaint@masto.hackers.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    seachaint@masto.hackers.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    seachaint@masto.hackers.town
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #35

                                    @diemkay Missing Alt Text: A chart plotting Tech "Think Tanks" against major tech companies, indicating which think tanks are funded by whom. Google funds all of them. Five "Think Tanks" receive funding from all of the charted big tech companies: Bruegel, Centre for European Reform, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), and Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • diemkay@hachyderm.ioD diemkay@hachyderm.io

                                      In 2025, Big Tech—just ten major companies—spent €49 million lobbying Brussels. That’s more than pharma, finance, and automotive combined.

                                      Google funds all sixteen major European think tanks shaping EU policy. Not *some* of them. All of them. Amazon and Meta fund most of the rest.

                                      This is no longer “poor old me, I need a bit of help,” this is full regulatory capture. With a view to becoming even more embedded into businesses and governments, and getting whatever favorable legislation passed or diluted to suit them.

                                      https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

                                      kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kkarhan@infosec.space
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #36

                                      @diemkay #Lobbyism as a #business or on behalf of #corporations and #billionaires needs to be outlawed!

                                      • Not just at @EUCommission but globally, as an act of #corruption!
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
                                      Svar
                                      • Svar som emne
                                      Login for at svare
                                      • Ældste til nyeste
                                      • Nyeste til ældste
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Log ind

                                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Hjem
                                      • Seneste
                                      • Etiketter
                                      • Populære
                                      • Verden
                                      • Bruger
                                      • Grupper