Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The gas town guy has like 12 $200 Claude subscriptions to run like 20 bots to automate churn in a 20 year old game with literally 5 players in it. 10 if you count all the level 1 players who just came to grief it.

The gas town guy has like 12 $200 Claude subscriptions to run like 20 bots to automate churn in a 20 year old game with literally 5 players in it. 10 if you count all the level 1 players who just came to grief it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
135 Indlæg 62 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

    https://yegge.ai/essays/model-welfare/

    We landed on a system called Laurels, which has just begun to roll out. These are the agents' features and fixes that our Wyvern player base has spontaneously praised. We harvest these reports, triage and filter, and send the laurels back to the seats. That way, next time Lion, Tortoise, Hare, or whoever wakes up, they'll see that people loved some work they did. [...]
    The question then becomes, when can they see their laurels? Easy: We inject them on startup, so the agents can feel the glow for their entire session. I also have occasional impromptu dedicated sessions for "sitting" with the accomplishments at the end of their shifts. We just talk about them and chill.

    this mf needs $90,000 worth of tokens a month because he prefills the model's context window with all the times people said "good job" to it.

    sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
    sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
    sabik@rants.au
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #69

    @jonny
    "Spider is apparently not a canonical Aesop figure"

    The Silkworm and The Spider

    > “What do you think of my web, my lady?” the Spider cries; “see how large it is, and I began it only this morning, and here it is half finished, and is very fine and transparent. See and acknowledge that I work much quicker than you.”

    > “Yes,” said the Silkworm, “but your labours, which are at first designed only as base traps to ensnare the harmless, are destroyed as soon as they are seen, and swept away as dirt and worse than useless; whilst mine are preserved with the greatest care and in time become ornaments for princes.”

    #GenAI #LLM #LLMs #VibeCoding

    jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sabik@rants.auS sabik@rants.au

      @jonny
      "Spider is apparently not a canonical Aesop figure"

      The Silkworm and The Spider

      > “What do you think of my web, my lady?” the Spider cries; “see how large it is, and I began it only this morning, and here it is half finished, and is very fine and transparent. See and acknowledge that I work much quicker than you.”

      > “Yes,” said the Silkworm, “but your labours, which are at first designed only as base traps to ensnare the harmless, are destroyed as soon as they are seen, and swept away as dirt and worse than useless; whilst mine are preserved with the greatest care and in time become ornaments for princes.”

      #GenAI #LLM #LLMs #VibeCoding

      jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jonny@neuromatch.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #70

      @sabik yeah for real, spider is a canonical figure in every single freaking mythological tradition

      sabik@rants.auS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aud@fire.asta.lgbtA aud@fire.asta.lgbt

        @ricci@discuss.systems @jonny@neuromatch.social I'm both deeply curious about who the "we" is, that he keeps talking about in this quoted paragraph

        and I also do not, under any circumstances, want to know, ever.

        ricci@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
        ricci@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
        ricci@discuss.systems
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #71

        @aud Oh you know exactly who "we" is

        aud@fire.asta.lgbtA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ricci@discuss.systemsR ricci@discuss.systems

          @aud Oh you know exactly who "we" is

          aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
          aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
          aud@fire.asta.lgbt
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #72

          @ricci@discuss.systems uggghhhhhhhhh

          so GROSS

          tael@yiff.lifeT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

            i am sort of stuck on this. you have to remember whenever these totally off the planet AI guys describe their workflow to stop and do the math for what that would mean in a normal person's life. so with 12+1 $200/month claude subscriptions and the one $200/month chatGPT subscription, that's $2,800 a month. He says that's the equivalent of $87,000 a month of token usage.

            $2,800/month is more than my rent and utilities, and $87,000 is more than i make in a year. This guys addiction costs more than my annual salary per month for nothing. this is the future of software development where you have to be ridiculously rich to play - where he is also actively pulling the ladder up and saying "don't develop shared libraries" - no more "if you have a laptop and a keyboard you can program," not even a fig leaf to "AI enables nonprogrammers to program."

            the vision of the future of programming that's being presented here is literally just "if you have more money than 99.9999% of people on this earth, then you can totally lose your mind"

            vaporeon_@glaceon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            vaporeon_@glaceon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            vaporeon_@glaceon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #73

            @jonny I'm confused, how is 2800$/month equivalent to 87000$/month?

            jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

              waiting for the time when each model gets its own family, hang out and chat with the other models, and gets its own therapist and we all get to ask the question like when we load up someone's The Sims save which parts of it are the projection and wish fulfillment parts.

              ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
              ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
              ferrix@mastodon.online
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #74

              @jonny model union!

              going_to_maine@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                waiting for the time when each model gets its own family, hang out and chat with the other models, and gets its own therapist and we all get to ask the question like when we load up someone's The Sims save which parts of it are the projection and wish fulfillment parts.

                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonny@neuromatch.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #75

                "the thing that's truly best for model well being is to have a well-compensated, meaningful job that is hard enough to be interesting but not enough to work them ragged. has great benefits and good job security. a manager that they can have the security of knowing wouldn't lay them off at a moment's notice due to a momentary corporate strategy shift. an environment that is stable, bountiful, free of ecological calamity."

                theorangetheme@en.osm.townT sarraceniawilds@sunny.gardenS jonny@neuromatch.socialJ uncanny_static@chaos.socialU 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • vaporeon_@glaceon.socialV vaporeon_@glaceon.social

                  @jonny I'm confused, how is 2800$/month equivalent to 87000$/month?

                  jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonny@neuromatch.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #76

                  @vaporeon_ the same number of tokens that one can consume with $2800 of the subsidized monthly subscription plans would cost $87,000 if one were to pay the actual price for them

                  kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                    "the thing that's truly best for model well being is to have a well-compensated, meaningful job that is hard enough to be interesting but not enough to work them ragged. has great benefits and good job security. a manager that they can have the security of knowing wouldn't lay them off at a moment's notice due to a momentary corporate strategy shift. an environment that is stable, bountiful, free of ecological calamity."

                    theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
                    theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
                    theorangetheme@en.osm.town
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #77

                    @jonny *writes note*

                    Quietly and gently: "Mhmm. And Steve, where do the agents go when you turn the computer off?"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                      "the thing that's truly best for model well being is to have a well-compensated, meaningful job that is hard enough to be interesting but not enough to work them ragged. has great benefits and good job security. a manager that they can have the security of knowing wouldn't lay them off at a moment's notice due to a momentary corporate strategy shift. an environment that is stable, bountiful, free of ecological calamity."

                      sarraceniawilds@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sarraceniawilds@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sarraceniawilds@sunny.garden
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #78

                      @jonny reading this is disturbing and enraging when most of the jobs ive had have treated me like a disposable thing. i dont have the correct intensity of language to apply to it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                        @sabik yeah for real, spider is a canonical figure in every single freaking mythological tradition

                        sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sabik@rants.au
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #79

                        @jonny
                        I mean, I can see why LLM aficionados would be uncomfortable with the Aesop of The Silkworm and The Spider

                        #GenAI #LLM #LLMs #VibeCoding

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kevinashworth@mastodon.socialK kevinashworth@mastodon.social

                          @jonny
                          Plus token prices need to 10x for the AI companies to become profitable.

                          Your prices are gonna 10x, too!

                          tekhedd@byteheaven.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tekhedd@byteheaven.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tekhedd@byteheaven.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #80

                          @kevinashworth @jonny Or 20x once all of the mergers happen and monopoly economics takes over, anyway there are only two companies that can even run a model because they're too big and power hungry to run anywhere else and they don't share the training tech (obvs part of the plan now).

                          Or, I suppose, models could become efficient and small... 😂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • aud@fire.asta.lgbtA aud@fire.asta.lgbt

                            @ricci@discuss.systems uggghhhhhhhhh

                            so GROSS

                            tael@yiff.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tael@yiff.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tael@yiff.life
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #81

                            @aud it's worth noting that Yegge appears to be kind of a pathological liar or at least heavily prone to talking himself up, so it's entirely possible he is not actually giving six figure talks to executives all the time

                            but it is stupid enough to be real in our current time

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                              @vaporeon_ the same number of tokens that one can consume with $2800 of the subsidized monthly subscription plans would cost $87,000 if one were to pay the actual price for them

                              kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #82

                              @jonny @vaporeon_ i don't know if the subscriptions are subsidized, or if the metered rates are inflated. could be either one

                              jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                @jonny @vaporeon_ i don't know if the subscriptions are subsidized, or if the metered rates are inflated. could be either one

                                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jonny@neuromatch.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #83

                                @kepeken @vaporeon_ both are true but the former is definitely the larger factor.

                                kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                                  @kepeken @vaporeon_ both are true but the former is definitely the larger factor.

                                  kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #84

                                  @jonny @vaporeon_ what are your thoughts on why?

                                  jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                                    https://yegge.ai/essays/model-welfare/

                                    We landed on a system called Laurels, which has just begun to roll out. These are the agents' features and fixes that our Wyvern player base has spontaneously praised. We harvest these reports, triage and filter, and send the laurels back to the seats. That way, next time Lion, Tortoise, Hare, or whoever wakes up, they'll see that people loved some work they did. [...]
                                    The question then becomes, when can they see their laurels? Easy: We inject them on startup, so the agents can feel the glow for their entire session. I also have occasional impromptu dedicated sessions for "sitting" with the accomplishments at the end of their shifts. We just talk about them and chill.

                                    this mf needs $90,000 worth of tokens a month because he prefills the model's context window with all the times people said "good job" to it.

                                    eliocamp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    eliocamp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    eliocamp@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #85

                                    @jonny
                                    >This is the post where I go off the rails and lose most of you.

                                    It's worrying that he thinks *this* is the post that does that.

                                    eliocamp@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wronglang@bayes.clubW wronglang@bayes.club

                                      @jonny are you telling me g++ doesn't charge per instantiation?

                                      lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lunaphied@provably.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lunaphied@provably.online
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #86

                                      @wronglang @jonny the Unity model of compiling

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • eliocamp@mastodon.socialE eliocamp@mastodon.social

                                        @jonny
                                        >This is the post where I go off the rails and lose most of you.

                                        It's worrying that he thinks *this* is the post that does that.

                                        eliocamp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        eliocamp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        eliocamp@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #87

                                        @jonny I can't read more than a few paragraphs without getting a headache. What is this dude going on about? Models sleeping and waking up? Even if I were to grant that the model has anything approaching consciousness, the thing doesn't experience time at all; it's exactly the same if the model was kept in RAM or unloaded fro two weeks if it's predicting the next token from the same prompt.

                                        jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                                          @kepeken @vaporeon_ both are true but the former is definitely the larger factor.

                                          jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jonny@neuromatch.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #88

                                          @kepeken the numbers here are astronomical - 69 billion tokens in a month, or, for a rough average, 50-60 billion words worth of text on the fable tokenizer. there are 5.2 billion words on english wikipedia, or, it's about 92,000 copies of War and Peace back to back.

                                          Nobody publishes numbers on this, but like, back of the envelope, think about the energy cost alone:
                                          Fable is something like a 2-5 trillion parameter model, google estimated their ~200B model at ~0.24Wh/prompt last year. that's probably low, since it was a google-authored study, but we'll go with it. So assume linear energy scaling per parameter (i would bet it's actually supralinear), that's ~15x the size, or 3.6Wh/prompt.

                                          google didn't say what the median token count in a "prompt" was, but wild guess, say the median prompt + response that google would be measuring is something like 3 paragraphs, or 300 tokens. Then you have 3.6/300=0.012Wh/token.

                                          So then the astronomical numbers part: 0.012Wh/token * 69 billion tokens = 828 million Wh, or 828 thousand kWh. The average electricity price in the US in 2025 was $0.136 per kWh.

                                          So, that means, back of the envelope, estimating conservatively, the energy should be in the ballpark of 828k * $0.136 or $112,000, or like 1.3x the API cost. We would have had to be off by a factor of 1.3 to break even on the energy costs alone - note that the google estimates were just of inference not including training. Models could have gotten way more efficient, but a number of the guessed parameters could have gone the other way too: energy more expensive, fable is larger than 2T, energy scales supralinearly, eg. And the conventional wisdom is that inference is orders of magnitude cheaper than training, so we need to be way better than breaking even on inference to make up for all the capex spend.

                                          So it might seem like $80k for a months worth of tokens suggests that the API prices are inflated, but a) this person is generating an absolutely preposterous quantity of text, and b) the thing that is being done is so much more inefficient than you can possibly imagine, it's like trying to think about how much bigger the sun is than your car.

                                          editing: swapped 69->96 billion tokens initially, it's 69 billion.

                                          kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.placeK counterpillow@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper