Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Sigh. OK.

Sigh. OK.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
47 Indlæg 29 Posters 189 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

    @miss_rodent @glyph Corporate needs you to find the differences: "I have a system" and "prompt engineering."

    ignaloidas@not.acu.ltI This user is from outside of this forum
    ignaloidas@not.acu.ltI This user is from outside of this forum
    ignaloidas@not.acu.lt
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #34

    @xgranade@wandering.shop @miss_rodent@girlcock.club @glyph@mastodon.social You can check whether or not the "system" brings results (usually not, besides blackjack(until you get kicked out)), you cannot check whether "prompt engineering" works.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kimsj@mastodon.socialK kimsj@mastodon.social

      @crystallinefire @glyph @rmi
      I'm not an LLM user, but from what I can see, it offers those who do use them a feeling of immense power and productivity. That definitely has parallels with the highs produced by some illicit substances: "Using this, I feel like I can do anything".

      The trail of destruction is similar too.

      #AI #LLMs #Addiction

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      digdilem@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #35

      @KimSJ @crystallinefire @glyph @rmi

      > a feeling of immense power and productivity.

      Sure, and comfort, confirmation and reassurance alongside the confidence. And then for most of us, we start to spot the problems. It's not unlike working alongside a colleague who is super confident, but has little real world experience.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

        Like this is a luminary in the field, mocking his critics for making a prediction he finds risible when that prediction HAS ALREADY COME TRUE. He did the thing, and it went badly, in the way that everyone who is mad at him was saying all along that it would go badly. But he still thinks that he's right! This is not an unrepentant dumb guy being dumb, this is one of the smartest engineers in the field BECOMING dumb right before our eyes. That ought to scare you!

        airlied@floss.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        airlied@floss.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        airlied@floss.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #36

        @glyph or it could be the patch that caused the regression was written by him in a hurry to fix a security hole. Then he realised he needed better testing and used AI tooling to try and solve the lack of testing and validation. Reading skills can't be that shit around here, maybe use an AI to read his blog post.

        fulk_it@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • doragasu@mastodon.sdf.orgD doragasu@mastodon.sdf.org

          @rmi @glyph True. It's the LLM slot machine gambling.

          twosky2000@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          twosky2000@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          twosky2000@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #37

          @doragasu @rmi @glyph more like doomscrolling, but my intuition it's similar.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

            @snaums the trouble with open source is we conflate these two things

            d_rift@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
            d_rift@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
            d_rift@beige.party
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #38

            @glyph @snaums I feel like this is what semantic versioning is supposed to provide the risk communication for.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

              RE: https://mastodon.social/@glyph/115839163441384816

              @rmi My initial comparisons to substance abuse were somewhat tentative and reluctant, back in January. But these have gone from being a few troubling-but-subtle bits of hearsay and implication to a drumbeat of near-daily incidents and I wish I were not feeling so validated in this particular view

              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              dnkboston@apobangpo.space
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #39

              @glyph God damn. Didn't consumer LLMs become widespread during the Biden administration? How do we already have so many people addicted to it?

              @rmi

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                @glyph In general,the smartest people you know are almost certainly only one context-switch away from acting like complete fools.

                coreysnipes@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                coreysnipes@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                coreysnipes@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #40

                @miss_rodent this is so true!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                  Sigh. OK. rsync discourse:

                  This is not a story about “vibe coding” or “slop” or regressions or even open source sustainability or whatever: it’s a story about mental health.

                  The timeline of Tridge’s response in particular can be broke down like so:

                  1. AI skeptics say "LLMs create difficult-to-evaluate defects, even if you're careful"
                  2. Tridge introduces defects even though he was careful
                  3. he gets yelled at
                  4. His response is to say "you dinosaurs don't appreciate how *careful* I was!"

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  slotos@toot.community
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #41

                  @glyph Just like „there are no atheists in the foxholes” adage doesn’t tell us much about atheists, successes of solo developers with AI don’t tell us much about AI.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                    Sigh. OK. rsync discourse:

                    This is not a story about “vibe coding” or “slop” or regressions or even open source sustainability or whatever: it’s a story about mental health.

                    The timeline of Tridge’s response in particular can be broke down like so:

                    1. AI skeptics say "LLMs create difficult-to-evaluate defects, even if you're careful"
                    2. Tridge introduces defects even though he was careful
                    3. he gets yelled at
                    4. His response is to say "you dinosaurs don't appreciate how *careful* I was!"

                    withaveeay@mastodon.scotW This user is from outside of this forum
                    withaveeay@mastodon.scotW This user is from outside of this forum
                    withaveeay@mastodon.scot
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #42

                    @glyph See also "Brexit"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                      RE: https://mastodon.social/@glyph/115839163441384816

                      @rmi My initial comparisons to substance abuse were somewhat tentative and reluctant, back in January. But these have gone from being a few troubling-but-subtle bits of hearsay and implication to a drumbeat of near-daily incidents and I wish I were not feeling so validated in this particular view

                      netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                      netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                      netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #43

                      @glyph @rmi I think it's worse than any drug addicts, because even with legal "soft" drugs like caffeine we don't tell people that they've to:

                      • Consume that shit or youcwill get fired.
                      • We'll fire people because someone OD'ing on caffeine is better than a well-adjusted being
                      • Allow execs to sout hateful garbage (i.e. that people refusing to do it should starve to death).

                      Like most junkies at least have the courtesy to keep their stuff away from small children, when the AIslop industry actively tries to target minors!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • rmi@cloudisland.nzR rmi@cloudisland.nz

                        @glyph I’ve seen this before, and no LLMs were involved. It’s addiction.

                        forthy42@mastodon.net2o.deF This user is from outside of this forum
                        forthy42@mastodon.net2o.deF This user is from outside of this forum
                        forthy42@mastodon.net2o.de
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #44

                        @rmi @glyph Microsoft plans to release an AI that is addictive. Ok, a plan leaked about it. It's probably not the only plan like that.

                        https://www.404media.co/microsoft-wants-to-make-people-addicted-to-scout-its-new-ai-assistant-internal-documents-reveal/

                        This is exactly the mental health status you'd expect e.g. from a smoker. Already diagnosed with COPD, he would still yell at everyone who told him so.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • airlied@floss.socialA airlied@floss.social

                          @glyph or it could be the patch that caused the regression was written by him in a hurry to fix a security hole. Then he realised he needed better testing and used AI tooling to try and solve the lack of testing and validation. Reading skills can't be that shit around here, maybe use an AI to read his blog post.

                          fulk_it@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fulk_it@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fulk_it@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #45

                          @airlied @glyph Why in the world would a sane person use AI to quickly generate code for tests???

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                            Sigh. OK. rsync discourse:

                            This is not a story about “vibe coding” or “slop” or regressions or even open source sustainability or whatever: it’s a story about mental health.

                            The timeline of Tridge’s response in particular can be broke down like so:

                            1. AI skeptics say "LLMs create difficult-to-evaluate defects, even if you're careful"
                            2. Tridge introduces defects even though he was careful
                            3. he gets yelled at
                            4. His response is to say "you dinosaurs don't appreciate how *careful* I was!"

                            regineheidorn@gruene.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            regineheidorn@gruene.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            regineheidorn@gruene.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #46

                            @glyph I keep reasoning about which logical fallacy is described in this pattern. Dunning-Kruger comes to mind: without knowing the subject being confident to have performed to the best knowledge.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                              Sigh. OK. rsync discourse:

                              This is not a story about “vibe coding” or “slop” or regressions or even open source sustainability or whatever: it’s a story about mental health.

                              The timeline of Tridge’s response in particular can be broke down like so:

                              1. AI skeptics say "LLMs create difficult-to-evaluate defects, even if you're careful"
                              2. Tridge introduces defects even though he was careful
                              3. he gets yelled at
                              4. His response is to say "you dinosaurs don't appreciate how *careful* I was!"

                              biglinter@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              biglinter@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              biglinter@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #47

                              @glyph it always surprises me how a non-deterministic model could be taken seriously....

                              if you train it, due to its non-determinism it looses half its memory between hours of chatting with it. thats not a fault, thats *by design*

                              i can understand where hes coming from with "careful".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper