Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. TIL: Box jellyfish larvae have eyes but no brain to connect them to so instead the eyes also swim a bit.

TIL: Box jellyfish larvae have eyes but no brain to connect them to so instead the eyes also swim a bit.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
10 Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
    tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
    tomhodson@tech.lgbt
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    TIL: Box jellyfish larvae have eyes but no brain to connect them to so instead the eyes also swim a bit. Source: Animal Eyes, Land & Nilsson, second edition, chapter 1

    tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

      TIL: Box jellyfish larvae have eyes but no brain to connect them to so instead the eyes also swim a bit. Source: Animal Eyes, Land & Nilsson, second edition, chapter 1

      tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
      tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
      tomhodson@tech.lgbt
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      Now they’re talking about how some animals make us of polarisation to detect the direction of the sun and also reflecting surfaces. If you’ve ever tried looking through some polarising sunglasses (with one eye) while rotating them you’ll have noticed that they block reflections off horizontal surfaces like water.

      tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

        Now they’re talking about how some animals make us of polarisation to detect the direction of the sun and also reflecting surfaces. If you’ve ever tried looking through some polarising sunglasses (with one eye) while rotating them you’ll have noticed that they block reflections off horizontal surfaces like water.

        tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
        tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
        tomhodson@tech.lgbt
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        I wonder if you could make a horrible pair of glasses where one eye was vertically polarised and the other horizontally polarised and train your brain with them until you could instinctively see polarised light sources. Like that trick for finding differences between two images that depends on crossing your eyes and looking at each image with just one eye.

        tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

          I wonder if you could make a horrible pair of glasses where one eye was vertically polarised and the other horizontally polarised and train your brain with them until you could instinctively see polarised light sources. Like that trick for finding differences between two images that depends on crossing your eyes and looking at each image with just one eye.

          tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
          tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
          tomhodson@tech.lgbt
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          Next TIL from this book: in the darkest conditions where you can still see enough to not bump into things, the rate of photon capture by each of the receptors in your eyes is about 1 per hour! You’re only able to see anything by averaging together the responses of many many cells. Explains why visual acuity is so diminished when it’s dark.

          tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

            Next TIL from this book: in the darkest conditions where you can still see enough to not bump into things, the rate of photon capture by each of the receptors in your eyes is about 1 per hour! You’re only able to see anything by averaging together the responses of many many cells. Explains why visual acuity is so diminished when it’s dark.

            tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
            tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
            tomhodson@tech.lgbt
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            This graph is great, in the text they point out that the range of intensity levels where human eyes work is about 10 orders of magnitude. However photoreceptors themselves only cover about 5 orders of magnitude. To make up the difference we have our iris that contracts at high levels and at low levels we pool information from groups of receptors.

            tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

              This graph is great, in the text they point out that the range of intensity levels where human eyes work is about 10 orders of magnitude. However photoreceptors themselves only cover about 5 orders of magnitude. To make up the difference we have our iris that contracts at high levels and at low levels we pool information from groups of receptors.

              tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomhodson@tech.lgbt
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              From the book: The octopus 🐙 is one of the few known animals that is truly colourblind since it has only one photoreceptor. I found this so surprising I looked it up, turns out there’s currently a bit of a debate and maybe they see colour through a very optically whacky combination of a weird pupil shape and chromatic aberration but it sounds like the jury is still out on this one.

              tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

                From the book: The octopus 🐙 is one of the few known animals that is truly colourblind since it has only one photoreceptor. I found this so surprising I looked it up, turns out there’s currently a bit of a debate and maybe they see colour through a very optically whacky combination of a weird pupil shape and chromatic aberration but it sounds like the jury is still out on this one.

                tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                tomhodson@tech.lgbt
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                So it’s well known that some animals can see distinguish the two linear polarisations of light, there are good reasons to do this: the sky has a pattern of linear polarisation that tells your where the sun is even if it’s cloudy, bees and insects use this to help orient themselves. There’s also evidence that some water bugs (water boatmen / Notonecta) use polarisation cues to find small bodies of water when their own is drying up.

                tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

                  So it’s well known that some animals can see distinguish the two linear polarisations of light, there are good reasons to do this: the sky has a pattern of linear polarisation that tells your where the sun is even if it’s cloudy, bees and insects use this to help orient themselves. There’s also evidence that some water bugs (water boatmen / Notonecta) use polarisation cues to find small bodies of water when their own is drying up.

                  tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tomhodson@tech.lgbt
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  This is already wild to me, it’s like there a whole extra dimension of “colour” that’s completely orthogonal to wavelength. But what’s crazier is that linear polarisation is not the only show in town. There’s also circular polarisation, which, like linear polarisation, comes in two kinds.

                  tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

                    This is already wild to me, it’s like there a whole extra dimension of “colour” that’s completely orthogonal to wavelength. But what’s crazier is that linear polarisation is not the only show in town. There’s also circular polarisation, which, like linear polarisation, comes in two kinds.

                    tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tomhodson@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    And the machinery required to detect circular polarisation is different from that required to detect linear polarisation. It’s unclear to me if there is much circularly polarised light floating around in nature so sure many no animal cares to see it anyway but…

                    tomhodson@tech.lgbtT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tomhodson@tech.lgbtT tomhodson@tech.lgbt

                      And the machinery required to detect circular polarisation is different from that required to detect linear polarisation. It’s unclear to me if there is much circularly polarised light floating around in nature so sure many no animal cares to see it anyway but…

                      tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tomhodson@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tomhodson@tech.lgbt
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      Enter the mantis shrimp, which apparently has receptors for both linearly polarised _and_ circularly polarised light. And the males have patterns on their bodies that reflect the two circular polarisations differently! No other organism is known to have the optical machinery to resolve this so the mantis shrimp has the most secret love language we know of.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper