Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex.

There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
biologysexuality
13 Indlæg 8 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

    There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex. The title and summary of a new paper on how scientists define sex, the lack of unanimity on the topic, and how some of the existing definitions just don't work for all organisms.

    Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70350

    #Biology #Sexuality

    peachfront@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
    peachfront@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
    peachfront@toot.community
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @ombialik

    i don't know what hummingbird they are illustrating but i think this was brought home in hummingbirds when a VERY widespread & (we thought) well-known hummingbird, the white-necked jacobin, was discovered that if you did the DNA test, around 10-20% of the birds in "male" plumage were "females" (capable of laying eggs)

    ombialik@mastodon.worldO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • peachfront@toot.communityP peachfront@toot.community

      @ombialik

      i don't know what hummingbird they are illustrating but i think this was brought home in hummingbirds when a VERY widespread & (we thought) well-known hummingbird, the white-necked jacobin, was discovered that if you did the DNA test, around 10-20% of the birds in "male" plumage were "females" (capable of laying eggs)

      ombialik@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
      ombialik@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
      ombialik@mastodon.world
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @peachfront Seems to be indeed the white-necked jacobin, based on the references in the captions. e.g. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/289/1982/20220332/79500/Intersexual-social-dominance-mimicry-drives-female

      peachfront@toot.communityP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.net

        @ombialik not a single positive peer review, h- index unknown. Lol.

        --
        Uriel Fanelli
        Using Aktor: https://git.keinpfusch.net/loweel/Aktor-2
        XMPP: uriel@keinpfusch.net
        old blog: https://blog.keinpfusch.net
        new blog: https://keinpfusch.net

        cxiao@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cxiao@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cxiao@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5

        @uriel imagine being so bad at reading comprehension and so bad at understanding scientific paper publication that you can't find the very obvious peer review link that it took me 5 seconds to find

        uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

          There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex. The title and summary of a new paper on how scientists define sex, the lack of unanimity on the topic, and how some of the existing definitions just don't work for all organisms.

          Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70350

          #Biology #Sexuality

          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          luc0x61@mastodon.uno
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @ombialik I admit my ignorance in a so specific analysis, but since it cites philosophers too it looks like anyone playing with words, more than science, may have their take.
          That said, what I find disturbing is always that final need to "classify" individuals. While it's quite often easy to tell who's gonna reproduce and who's not, the scientifical evidence is (ironically) now used by social and religious movements, that just want to keep a grip on power and control. These are just free words.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cxiao@infosec.exchangeC cxiao@infosec.exchange

            @uriel imagine being so bad at reading comprehension and so bad at understanding scientific paper publication that you can't find the very obvious peer review link that it took me 5 seconds to find

            uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
            uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
            uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7

            @cxiao imagine there is none. And this is why you don't post the link here.

            --
            Uriel Fanelli
            Using Aktor: https://git.keinpfusch.net/loweel/Aktor-2
            XMPP: uriel@keinpfusch.net
            old blog: https://blog.keinpfusch.net
            new blog: https://keinpfusch.net

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

              There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex. The title and summary of a new paper on how scientists define sex, the lack of unanimity on the topic, and how some of the existing definitions just don't work for all organisms.

              Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70350

              #Biology #Sexuality

              meltedcheese@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
              meltedcheese@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
              meltedcheese@c.im
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @ombialik I found this chart to be useful in understanding the biological basis of #sex. As you say, no scientific consensus yet. Unfortunately, I’ve lost track of the original source.

              ombialik@mastodon.worldO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

                There is No (scientific) Consensus on Biological Sex. The title and summary of a new paper on how scientists define sex, the lack of unanimity on the topic, and how some of the existing definitions just don't work for all organisms.

                Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70350

                #Biology #Sexuality

                aubreydelosdestinos@101010.plA This user is from outside of this forum
                aubreydelosdestinos@101010.plA This user is from outside of this forum
                aubreydelosdestinos@101010.pl
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                @ombialik @rysiek Isn't that the problem, though? It's a social construct and social consensus, and it's hard to overrule.

                benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • aubreydelosdestinos@101010.plA aubreydelosdestinos@101010.pl

                  @ombialik @rysiek Isn't that the problem, though? It's a social construct and social consensus, and it's hard to overrule.

                  benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benjamineskola@hachyderm.io
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  @AubreyDeLosDestinos @ombialik @rysiek I think the thing is that transphobes often want to claim it’s simply scientific fact. Biology says this, therefore opinions are irrelevant. When actually as this paper seems to point out, there is no such thing as unambiguous universal scientific fact in this topic.

                  Social constructs are not necessarily easy to change, true, but they are at least possible to change.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • meltedcheese@c.imM meltedcheese@c.im

                    @ombialik I found this chart to be useful in understanding the biological basis of #sex. As you say, no scientific consensus yet. Unfortunately, I’ve lost track of the original source.

                    ombialik@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ombialik@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ombialik@mastodon.world
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    @meltedcheese Found it, 2017 item in Scientific American by Amanda Montañez
                    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/beyond-xx-and-xy-the-extraordinary-complexity-of-sex-determination/

                    meltedcheese@c.imM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

                      @peachfront Seems to be indeed the white-necked jacobin, based on the references in the captions. e.g. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/289/1982/20220332/79500/Intersexual-social-dominance-mimicry-drives-female

                      peachfront@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
                      peachfront@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
                      peachfront@toot.community
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      @ombialik

                      it makes you wonder what else we will learn when more is known about the other species of hummingbirds (there are ballpark 350 species)

                      we have already learned that an unrelated bird species, the white-throated sparrow, has 4 genders

                      there is always something new to discover!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ombialik@mastodon.worldO ombialik@mastodon.world

                        @meltedcheese Found it, 2017 item in Scientific American by Amanda Montañez
                        https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/beyond-xx-and-xy-the-extraordinary-complexity-of-sex-determination/

                        meltedcheese@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                        meltedcheese@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                        meltedcheese@c.im
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        @ombialik Thank you! I used to save all my back issues of Scientific American. Sine I subscribed at about age 14, that became a very big pile when I made to decision to only save a couple of years, at age 55 or so.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • folfdk@helvede.netF folfdk@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper