Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
48 Indlæg 27 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • plantarum@ottawa.placeP plantarum@ottawa.place

    @fishidwardrobe @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze

    My understanding is that at least part of the confusion is due to China building both new coal plans and renewables at a very high rate.

    They are adding a lot of new coal plants, but the proportion of total energy produced by coal still declines when you factor in all the new solar and wind they're doing at the same time.

    I am not a reliable source (although I do my best)! I think @parismarx discussed this in a recent episode of the #TechWontSaveUs podcast on the #GreenTransition

    fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
    fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
    fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #26

    @plantarum @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze @parismarx figures i linked to are not proportionate to solar. just coal consumption.

    plantarum@ottawa.placeP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk

      @plantarum @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze @parismarx figures i linked to are not proportionate to solar. just coal consumption.

      plantarum@ottawa.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
      plantarum@ottawa.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
      plantarum@ottawa.place
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #27

      @fishidwardrobe @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze @parismarx

      From 2025. Lots of interesting details, including solar growing in proportion to coal, while coal continues to grow in absolute volume as well.

      "China is on its way to becoming the world’s first “electrostate”, with a growing share of its energy coming from electricity and an economy increasingly driven by clean technologies ...

      China remains the world’s biggest greenhouse gas producer and its power sector emissions reached a new high last year, driven by a rise in coal consumption... still the dominant fuel in its electricity mix, despite a surge in renewable capacity additions."

      https://www.ft.com/content/f86782fa-9f2e-448a-b710-29e787dc9831

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

        The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

        Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

        kevinrothrock@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
        kevinrothrock@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
        kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #28

        @schratze excellent toot

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

          The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

          Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

          eliasp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eliasp@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eliasp@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #29

          @schratze you wanted to say "they're not reliable enough in increasing the profits of shady regimes through manufactured crises"?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

            The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

            Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

            odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
            odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
            odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #30

            @schratze I'm putting a 10% tax on wind!

            deftpunk@fosstodon.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

              The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

              Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

              deftpunk@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
              deftpunk@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
              deftpunk@fosstodon.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #31

              @schratze I hear that some companies are starting to offshore their wind turbines though.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange

                @schratze I'm putting a 10% tax on wind!

                deftpunk@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                deftpunk@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                deftpunk@fosstodon.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #32

                @odr_k4tana @schratze We've got to put a stop to all this cheap foreign sunlight that is flooding into the country.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

                  The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

                  Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

                  robertootarola@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  robertootarola@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  robertootarola@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #33

                  @schratze the problem with energy, whether renewable or fossil, is not so much its production (i.e., generation, storage, transmission, and distribution) but rather our insatiable consumption of it.

                  openrisk@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • schratze@todon.nlS schratze@todon.nl

                    The problem with renewable energies is that they're just not reliable enough.

                    Where is your wind and solar power supposed to come from now that the strait of Hormuz is blocked?

                    lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lispi314@udongein.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #34
                    @schratze Space, with the delivery ayyylmaos
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS samueljohnson@mstdn.social

                      @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze Nevertheless the share of China's energy that comes from coal is declining fast and will continue to do so

                      https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-energy-source-sub?country=~CHN

                      Furthermore, some of the new coal plants replace older inefficient ones and produce fewer emissions.

                      One would almost think the Chinese have expected trouble in t' gulf and planned accordingly.

                      lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lispi314@udongein.xyz
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #35

                      @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl Those powerplants do have a limited lifespan.

                      If they’re all coming due basically the same time, then the VC’s observation can be correct and misleading.

                      iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lispi314@udongein.xyzL lispi314@udongein.xyz

                        @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl Those powerplants do have a limited lifespan.

                        If they’re all coming due basically the same time, then the VC’s observation can be correct and misleading.

                        iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iwein@mas.to
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #36

                        @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @samueljohnson @schratze lots of interesting observations thanks. To hopefully unconfuse: the only important metric is the absolute number for fossils. If that doesn't come down we're fucked.

                        It's going up, globally, at record rates, also for China.

                        My guess is that the main reason for this detail is that we're outsourcing production to China, instead of consuming less, and another wild guess is the main culprits still are cement and steel.

                        lispi314@udongein.xyzL samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                          @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @samueljohnson @schratze lots of interesting observations thanks. To hopefully unconfuse: the only important metric is the absolute number for fossils. If that doesn't come down we're fucked.

                          It's going up, globally, at record rates, also for China.

                          My guess is that the main reason for this detail is that we're outsourcing production to China, instead of consuming less, and another wild guess is the main culprits still are cement and steel.

                          lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lispi314@udongein.xyz
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #37

                          @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl

                          the only important metric is the absolute number for fossils.

                          Then I suppose you can thank the USA for their recent war. That’s going to accelerate divestment of fossil fuels in a lot of places.

                          Price will have doubled before long and won’t go down nearly as fast. That changes a lot of calculations on switchover.

                          iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lispi314@udongein.xyzL lispi314@udongein.xyz

                            @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl

                            the only important metric is the absolute number for fossils.

                            Then I suppose you can thank the USA for their recent war. That’s going to accelerate divestment of fossil fuels in a lot of places.

                            Price will have doubled before long and won’t go down nearly as fast. That changes a lot of calculations on switchover.

                            iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                            iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                            iwein@mas.to
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #38

                            @lispi314 there's always some asshole I can blame, I'm sure. And the #epsteinClass are usually excellent targets for that.

                            But today I'll just plant some trees first 🙂

                            @schratze

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS samueljohnson@mstdn.social

                              @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze Nevertheless the share of China's energy that comes from coal is declining fast and will continue to do so

                              https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-energy-source-sub?country=~CHN

                              Furthermore, some of the new coal plants replace older inefficient ones and produce fewer emissions.

                              One would almost think the Chinese have expected trouble in t' gulf and planned accordingly.

                              lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lispi314@udongein.xyz
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #39

                              @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl

                              One would almost think the Chinese have expected trouble in t’ gulf and planned accordingly.

                              They probably expected it from literally all major sources of fossil fuels not within their borders.

                              I would feel comfortable speculating the turn to solar is long-term strategy for decoupling internal stability from external shenanigans.

                              They would also very well know the downsides of coal-based generation on health & such.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                                @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @samueljohnson @schratze lots of interesting observations thanks. To hopefully unconfuse: the only important metric is the absolute number for fossils. If that doesn't come down we're fucked.

                                It's going up, globally, at record rates, also for China.

                                My guess is that the main reason for this detail is that we're outsourcing production to China, instead of consuming less, and another wild guess is the main culprits still are cement and steel.

                                samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                samueljohnson@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #40

                                @iwein @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze True. The rapid growth of renewables is our only hope and is happening, with predictions being exceeded every year. It's not Game Over yet, and there's some chance that current conflicts will further accelerate the transition.

                                If cement industry was a country it would rank 7th for emissions (Economist some yrs ago). EU's CBAM should help w some of the diversion to China and others will need to follow. US insanity will (must) be unsustained.

                                lispi314@udongein.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • samueljohnson@mstdn.socialS samueljohnson@mstdn.social

                                  @iwein @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze True. The rapid growth of renewables is our only hope and is happening, with predictions being exceeded every year. It's not Game Over yet, and there's some chance that current conflicts will further accelerate the transition.

                                  If cement industry was a country it would rank 7th for emissions (Economist some yrs ago). EU's CBAM should help w some of the diversion to China and others will need to follow. US insanity will (must) be unsustained.

                                  lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lispi314@udongein.xyz
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #41
                                  @samueljohnson @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze Now if only we could have a solution to cement/concrete's CO2 it'd be great.

                                  edit: Apparently injecting CO2 into concrete as it sets mineralizes it on the spot which is interesting to know, I suppose.
                                  iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • lispi314@udongein.xyzL lispi314@udongein.xyz
                                    @samueljohnson @iwein @emily_s @gardengeek @schratze Now if only we could have a solution to cement/concrete's CO2 it'd be great.

                                    edit: Apparently injecting CO2 into concrete as it sets mineralizes it on the spot which is interesting to know, I suppose.
                                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    iwein@mas.to
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #42

                                    @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @samueljohnson @schratze short term we should just use less of it, long term carbon itself provides materials far superior to concrete and steel.

                                    If we'd invest all the budgets going into war right now into research instead, it wouldn't take more than a few decades before we can produce something like graphene at scale.

                                    Not super realistic under capitalism and fascism, but certainly possible from a more scientific perspective.

                                    Oh well 🙂

                                    lispi314@udongein.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                                      @lispi314 @emily_s @gardengeek @samueljohnson @schratze short term we should just use less of it, long term carbon itself provides materials far superior to concrete and steel.

                                      If we'd invest all the budgets going into war right now into research instead, it wouldn't take more than a few decades before we can produce something like graphene at scale.

                                      Not super realistic under capitalism and fascism, but certainly possible from a more scientific perspective.

                                      Oh well 🙂

                                      lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lispi314@udongein.xyz
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #43

                                      @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl

                                      short term we should just use less of it

                                      Is that viable? I legitimately don’t know how modern buildings (that aren’t ridiculous skyscrapers justified primarily by absurd car-centric land-use regulations and ego) are built.

                                      For instance, why is brick less common now? Is it worse?

                                      For steel the initial refinement is magnitudes worse than any future recycling/reuse though. So that might be something to incentivize somehow.

                                      Not super realistic under capitalism and fascism, but certainly possible from a more scientific perspective.

                                      I could see adversary states funding research in an attempt to destabilize some country’s industries that happen to be focused on production of one thing or another.

                                      iwein@mas.toI burnitdown@beige.partyB 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • lispi314@udongein.xyzL lispi314@udongein.xyz

                                        @iwein@mas.to @emily_s@mastodon.me.uk @gardengeek@mstdn.social @samueljohnson@mstdn.social @schratze@todon.nl

                                        short term we should just use less of it

                                        Is that viable? I legitimately don’t know how modern buildings (that aren’t ridiculous skyscrapers justified primarily by absurd car-centric land-use regulations and ego) are built.

                                        For instance, why is brick less common now? Is it worse?

                                        For steel the initial refinement is magnitudes worse than any future recycling/reuse though. So that might be something to incentivize somehow.

                                        Not super realistic under capitalism and fascism, but certainly possible from a more scientific perspective.

                                        I could see adversary states funding research in an attempt to destabilize some country’s industries that happen to be focused on production of one thing or another.

                                        iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        iwein@mas.to
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #44

                                        @lispi314 small homes are best built from organic materials. That's already being done and works well.

                                        lispi314@udongein.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                                          @lispi314 small homes are best built from organic materials. That's already being done and works well.

                                          lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lispi314@udongein.xyz
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #45
                                          @iwein That's a bit vague though. The environmental impact of SFH is pretty awful regardless of the materials as a consequence of the sprawl & its effects on infrastructural requirements.

                                          At the same time, it's not like prefab-style apartments aren't feasible with wood and unlike in the past we have these fancy sprinkler things now.
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper