Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Chat GPT strikes again!

Chat GPT strikes again!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
chatgptstudentllm
2 Indlæg 2 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • lisagetspolitik@union.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lisagetspolitik@union.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lisagetspolitik@union.place
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Chat GPT strikes again!

    The last line of a student submission reads:

    "If your instructor prefers a more personal, student-style response, this version should sound natural while still earning full credit."

    My response: "The reflection would be stronger if it did not acknowledge in the last sentence that you did not write it yourself based on your own analysis."

    #CHATGPT #student #LLM

    tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lisagetspolitik@union.placeL lisagetspolitik@union.place

      Chat GPT strikes again!

      The last line of a student submission reads:

      "If your instructor prefers a more personal, student-style response, this version should sound natural while still earning full credit."

      My response: "The reflection would be stronger if it did not acknowledge in the last sentence that you did not write it yourself based on your own analysis."

      #CHATGPT #student #LLM

      tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tanyakaroli@expressional.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @lisagetspolitik At least this one is easy to prove! The problem is that we can’t prove use of LLMs in most instances. And what are we really assessing, then?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Svar
      • Svar som emne
      Login for at svare
      • Ældste til nyeste
      • Nyeste til ældste
      • Most Votes


      • Log ind

      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      Graciously hosted by data.coop
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Hjem
      • Seneste
      • Etiketter
      • Populære
      • Verden
      • Bruger
      • Grupper