Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The FAA quietly imposed a nationwide drone restriction that prevents filming ICE and other federal agents within half a mile.

The FAA quietly imposed a nationwide drone restriction that prevents filming ICE and other federal agents within half a mile.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
12 Indlæg 10 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • eff@mastodon.socialE eff@mastodon.social

    The FAA quietly imposed a nationwide drone restriction that prevents filming ICE and other federal agents within half a mile. It’s an attack on the First Amendment. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice

    endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    endicottauthor@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    @eff Can I predict a lawsuit in the near future?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • eff@mastodon.socialE eff@mastodon.social

      The FAA quietly imposed a nationwide drone restriction that prevents filming ICE and other federal agents within half a mile. It’s an attack on the First Amendment. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice

      bzdev@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
      bzdev@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
      bzdev@fosstodon.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

      krissykat@hoosier.socialK bobulous@fosstodon.orgB contrasocial@mastodon.socialC dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD melioristicmarie@tech.lgbtM 5 Replies Last reply
      0
      • bzdev@fosstodon.orgB bzdev@fosstodon.org

        @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

        krissykat@hoosier.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        krissykat@hoosier.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        krissykat@hoosier.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        @bzdev @eff

        I was thinking the same. Maybe ICE and CBP should make announcements where they'll be to give drone operators and the public the ability to follow the regulation.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bzdev@fosstodon.orgB bzdev@fosstodon.org

          @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

          bobulous@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
          bobulous@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
          bobulous@fosstodon.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          @bzdev @eff You're not thinking of it with a fascist's mind. The dictator's storm troops will attack anyone they catch filming them anyway; this law just gives them legal coverage after the event. Saves the dictator from breaking out his thick Sharpie to issue a pardon.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bzdev@fosstodon.orgB bzdev@fosstodon.org

            @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

            contrasocial@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            contrasocial@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            contrasocial@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @bzdev @eff

            None of the half-assed shit they do has been thought out that far, they are simply interested in a creating a barrage of attacks on our civil liberties and hoping enough sticks to keep people afraid of holding them accountable.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bzdev@fosstodon.orgB bzdev@fosstodon.org

              @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

              dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dresstokilt@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @bzdev @eff the answer is that ICE is everywhere and if they want to arrest you for flying a drone, they will.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • eff@mastodon.socialE eff@mastodon.social

                The FAA quietly imposed a nationwide drone restriction that prevents filming ICE and other federal agents within half a mile. It’s an attack on the First Amendment. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice

                missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                missgayle@urbanists.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @eff

                Which is why people need cameras in their eaves, roofs, and windows of their businesses and homes. Not hooked up to the internet, and not obvious.

                mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • missgayle@urbanists.socialM missgayle@urbanists.social

                  @eff

                  Which is why people need cameras in their eaves, roofs, and windows of their businesses and homes. Not hooked up to the internet, and not obvious.

                  mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mxverda@lgbtqia.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @MissGayle @eff seeing this reply out of context, or even within context, is as suitably horrifying as everything else I've observed today.

                  missgayle@urbanists.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bzdev@fosstodon.orgB bzdev@fosstodon.org

                    @eff Just out of curiosity, how does a drone operator comply with this restriction if they don't publish the precise location of every "ICE and CBP vehicle"? If a drone was being used, for example, to inspect my roof, how would the operator know that an ICE vehicle was driving down the freeway less than 1/2 mile away?

                    melioristicmarie@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                    melioristicmarie@tech.lgbtM This user is from outside of this forum
                    melioristicmarie@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @bzdev maybe they will start wearing r.f.id's ? still masks and no name tags or license plates, but uniquely tagged. or maybe they will start getting microchipped. oh the ideas running around in my mind now...

                    @eff

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM mxverda@lgbtqia.space

                      @MissGayle @eff seeing this reply out of context, or even within context, is as suitably horrifying as everything else I've observed today.

                      missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      missgayle@urbanists.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @MxVerda @eff

                      We are in a civil war a people don't seem to get it. Videos won't stop the violence. They'll just be evidence for the trials later.

                      mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • missgayle@urbanists.socialM missgayle@urbanists.social

                        @MxVerda @eff

                        We are in a civil war a people don't seem to get it. Videos won't stop the violence. They'll just be evidence for the trials later.

                        mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mxverda@lgbtqia.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mxverda@lgbtqia.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        @MissGayle @eff sounds reasonable to me. I don't have to like yet more cameras everywhere.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper