Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Transit should be fast, frequent, and fareless.

Transit should be fast, frequent, and fareless.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
3 Indlæg 2 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • enobacon@urbanists.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    enobacon@urbanists.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    enobacon@urbanists.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Transit should be fast, frequent, and fareless. The cost is a pittance compared to the socialism we splash around for cars: $600M for NYC!!?? Take $1.2B out of the highway department's budget overrun bucket for a single offramp. 💸

    https://thewaroncars.org/2025/08/12/episode-156-should-the-bus-be-free-with-yonah-freemark/

    enobacon@urbanists.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • enobacon@urbanists.socialE enobacon@urbanists.social

      Transit should be fast, frequent, and fareless. The cost is a pittance compared to the socialism we splash around for cars: $600M for NYC!!?? Take $1.2B out of the highway department's budget overrun bucket for a single offramp. 💸

      https://thewaroncars.org/2025/08/12/episode-156-should-the-bus-be-free-with-yonah-freemark/

      enobacon@urbanists.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      enobacon@urbanists.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      enobacon@urbanists.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      People get too hung up on the cost of #farelessTransit and don't see the benefits of a system without gatekeeping, turnstiles, tracking devices, policing. All-door boarding, or eliminating administrative overhead, and giving access to everyone without jumping through hoops of means-tested reduced-fare programs.

      jwcph@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • enobacon@urbanists.socialE enobacon@urbanists.social

        People get too hung up on the cost of #farelessTransit and don't see the benefits of a system without gatekeeping, turnstiles, tracking devices, policing. All-door boarding, or eliminating administrative overhead, and giving access to everyone without jumping through hoops of means-tested reduced-fare programs.

        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jwcph@helvede.net
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @enobacon My colleagues & I literally just talked about this at lunch today - one of them said that in some Danish city, she didn't remember which, they were planning or even implementing fareless public transit & they'd done their due diligence; according to the numbers they'd come out ahead when accounting for all the logistics & admin they would be able to eliminate by cutting the ticketing & control system 😊

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Svar
        • Svar som emne
        Login for at svare
        • Ældste til nyeste
        • Nyeste til ældste
        • Most Votes


        • Log ind

        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        Graciously hosted by data.coop
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Hjem
        • Seneste
        • Etiketter
        • Populære
        • Verden
        • Bruger
        • Grupper