Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek.

i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
32 Indlæg 29 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

    i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
    the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

    tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
    tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
    tk@f.kawa-kun.com
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6
    @pikhq I refer to the current era as technofascist. 😕
    daanlo@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

      i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
      the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

      roblosricos@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      roblosricos@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      roblosricos@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @pikhq

      you totally misunderstood - it was going to usher in wealth for a few. that was never a secret, though they the technocrati did say different things to people of different economic status.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tk@f.kawa-kun.comT tk@f.kawa-kun.com
        @pikhq I refer to the current era as technofascist. 😕
        daanlo@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        daanlo@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        daanlo@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @tk @pikhq the question I ask myself is, what made the techno-optimists turn into techno-fascists?
        1) becoming rich/powerful?
        2) they were always techno-fascists, it just wasn‘t visible
        3) that‘s just the zeitgeist
        4) strategic infiltration by fascists
        Any other ideas?

        burn_this_@beige.partyB vex@kolektiva.socialV 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

          i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
          the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

          astropug@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
          astropug@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
          astropug@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @pikhq

          My computer time was severely restricted as a nineties kid but I feel like I got more of the optimism as well. Pity to see it fly. I feel disappointed on the daily.

          But I wonder.

          I think what made us optimistic is that we can work together and can outsmart bad things. And that’s still the case, though the boot wants us to think otherwise.

          Everything we learned and will learn is useful and a tool in our hands.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW wifiwits@infosec.exchange

            @pikhq disappointing isn’t it.

            vfrmedia@social.tchncs.deV This user is from outside of this forum
            vfrmedia@social.tchncs.deV This user is from outside of this forum
            vfrmedia@social.tchncs.de
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @Wifiwits @pikhq

            I am slightly older and grew up with tech in 1980s, it always started out as something for the military/industrial complex (especially nuclear weapons related stuff) so I never really believed in the techno-optimism of the 90s (it was all crumbs from the table after the temporary lull in the Cold War)

            krosen_nw@mindly.socialK beadsland@beige.partyB 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

              i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
              the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

              burn_this_@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
              burn_this_@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
              burn_this_@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @pikhq
              Well, forever is a long time.

              It reminds me of that Who song,
              🎵 Meet the new boot / same as the old boot 🎵

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • daanlo@mastodon.socialD daanlo@mastodon.social

                @tk @pikhq the question I ask myself is, what made the techno-optimists turn into techno-fascists?
                1) becoming rich/powerful?
                2) they were always techno-fascists, it just wasn‘t visible
                3) that‘s just the zeitgeist
                4) strategic infiltration by fascists
                Any other ideas?

                burn_this_@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                burn_this_@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                burn_this_@beige.party
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @Daanlo @tk @pikhq
                I pick #2 along with self-discovery.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

                  i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
                  the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

                  newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                  newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                  newstik@social.heise.de
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @pikhq So you have an idea of how socialists and communists must have felt.

                  iju@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • daanlo@mastodon.socialD daanlo@mastodon.social

                    @tk @pikhq the question I ask myself is, what made the techno-optimists turn into techno-fascists?
                    1) becoming rich/powerful?
                    2) they were always techno-fascists, it just wasn‘t visible
                    3) that‘s just the zeitgeist
                    4) strategic infiltration by fascists
                    Any other ideas?

                    vex@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vex@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vex@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @Daanlo @tk @pikhq all of the above is relevant, but specifically it's the combination of colonized language + hierarchy that causes people to identify with power/status over experience, which simultaneously disconnects from the latter (& thus disconnects from reality/causality).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

                      i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
                      the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

                      nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @pikhq Same thing here. To be clear, there is a potential optimism that could exist, it's just the bad actors took it all over and society, as a whole, let them. I'm not sure if it's salvageable at this point for sure, but I know taking back control (using *nix/BSD/etc, rejecting corporate media, etc) is a darned good start...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

                        i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
                        the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        @pikhq yes. we feel sad, and betrayed, but mostly we feel naive and angry...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

                          i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
                          the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

                          wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wesdym@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #17

                          @pikhq The past tense of 'lead' is LED.

                          If you're asked to lead someone somewhere, and you do that, then afterwards you'd say you LED them.

                          matdave@floss.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pikhq@social.treehouse.systemsP pikhq@social.treehouse.systems

                            i grew up in the 90s, as a computer geek. this meant i soaked in the techno-optimism of the age. it has been really disorienting seeing that techno-optimism lead to this current era of techno-authoritarianism, lead by the proponents of that techno-optimism.
                            the bright and shining future i was promised was a boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.

                            aspragg@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aspragg@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aspragg@ohai.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #18

                            @pikhq It felt like computers and the internet could be used - no, *were* being used - to add value to people's lives.

                            Now it feels like they're being used to extract value from people's lives.

                            _ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • athena@chaosfem.twA athena@chaosfem.tw

                              @pikhq we made a machine that can do anything and used it to do this

                              burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                              burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                              burnitdown@beige.party
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #19

                              @Athena @pikhq

                              computers can do a lot of things but it's a far stretch to say "anything". there are a lot of things computers can't do and tasks for which they should not be relied on.

                              athena@chaosfem.twA plaidtron3000@jorts.horseP 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • aspragg@ohai.socialA aspragg@ohai.social

                                @pikhq It felt like computers and the internet could be used - no, *were* being used - to add value to people's lives.

                                Now it feels like they're being used to extract value from people's lives.

                                _ This user is from outside of this forum
                                _ This user is from outside of this forum
                                __d@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #20

                                @aspragg @pikhq I think it was the naïveté and ignorance of the technocratic middle class. We took the money of the oppressors and built things that we thought were egalitarian, but almost universally failed to prevent misuse. It wasn’t ill intended, but it is obvious in hindsight that we were co-opted with minimal resistance at every step.

                                Which I think of often in this AI world.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • newstik@social.heise.deN newstik@social.heise.de

                                  @pikhq So you have an idea of how socialists and communists must have felt.

                                  iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iju@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #21

                                  @newstik @pikhq

                                  Well, that future is just postphoned, not cancelled.

                                  After all, Marx said that socialism would need late-industrial society, and Lenin read that to mean that you could coup agrarian society and speedrun it through capitalism.

                                  The problem with that is what happened: then the actual late-industrialised societies could start using that coup as a way to manufacture consent.

                                  In a way collapse of the East Bloc is just a return to previously scheduled programming.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                                    @Athena @pikhq

                                    computers can do a lot of things but it's a far stretch to say "anything". there are a lot of things computers can't do and tasks for which they should not be relied on.

                                    athena@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    athena@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    athena@chaosfem.tw
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #22

                                    @burnitdown we literally made a machine that can compute any computable function. that’s the church-turing thesis, the whole foundation of computing. every processor is an implementation of a turing machine; a universal machine

                                    now

                                    to be sure “any computable function” both stretches very far and is not very compatible with many tasks. that is rather my point, you may imagine my original response read with an inflection of horror and disdain on “this”, because I am horrified by what we collectively have done with the universal machine

                                    I guess what I’m saying is, hard disagree on the first part: computers can, to a first approximation, do anything in a theoretical sense. but big agree with the second thing: there are a great many things they ought not be used to do that they are frequently pressed into service as anyway

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wesdym@mastodon.socialW wesdym@mastodon.social

                                      @pikhq The past tense of 'lead' is LED.

                                      If you're asked to lead someone somewhere, and you do that, then afterwards you'd say you LED them.

                                      matdave@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      matdave@floss.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      matdave@floss.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #23

                                      @wesdym @pikhq if you understand what they meant then the words they used worked to convey their intentions

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                                        @Athena @pikhq

                                        computers can do a lot of things but it's a far stretch to say "anything". there are a lot of things computers can't do and tasks for which they should not be relied on.

                                        plaidtron3000@jorts.horseP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        plaidtron3000@jorts.horseP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        plaidtron3000@jorts.horse
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #24

                                        @burnitdown @Athena @pikhq this feels like unwarranted pedantry

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hillu@infosec.exchangeH hillu@infosec.exchange

                                          @pikhq How I long for all the optimistic sentiments about information wanting to be free and how everything would optimize itself for a Greater Good if only everyone had access to that freed information. Simpler times, certainly. Also: No more wars, that was a nice lookout.

                                          darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darwinwoodka@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #25

                                          @hillu @pikhq

                                          I still think information wants to be free. Democracy dies behind paywalls. It's this idea that everything must be for sale that's killing us.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper