“Don’t do nonviolent resistance to a genocide because it can be dangerous” should always be complemented by “don’t do a genocide because it is an illegal war crime”.
-
“Don’t do nonviolent resistance to a genocide because it can be dangerous” should always be complemented by “don’t do a genocide because it is an illegal war crime”.
But we are in the free Europe enjoying mature democracies, and when this doesn’t happen we have the power and the right to ask safety-concerned warnings also for war criminals, and not just for European pacifists.
We can do it subscribing an ongoing European Citizen’s Initiative (ECI) at the link below:
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
-
“Don’t do nonviolent resistance to a genocide because it can be dangerous” should always be complemented by “don’t do a genocide because it is an illegal war crime”.
But we are in the free Europe enjoying mature democracies, and when this doesn’t happen we have the power and the right to ask safety-concerned warnings also for war criminals, and not just for European pacifists.
We can do it subscribing an ongoing European Citizen’s Initiative (ECI) at the link below:
@EUCommission
why do you discourage providing food for people who are being starved?
