Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populรฆre
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. A paper that I co-authored was just published (#OpenAccess) a few minutes ago in Nature ๐ŸŽ‰ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10260-w

A paper that I co-authored was just published (#OpenAccess) a few minutes ago in Nature ๐ŸŽ‰ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10260-w

Planlagt Fastgjort Lรฅst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
openaccesslightpollutionenergyalanremotesensing
18 Indlรฆg 4 Posters 0 Visninger
  • ร†ldste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til รฆldste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne trรฅd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

    A paper that I co-authored was just published (#OpenAccess) a few minutes ago in Nature ๐ŸŽ‰ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10260-w

    Here's a short thread about what we did and what we learned ๐Ÿ‘‡

    #LightPollution #Energy #ALAN #RemoteSensing #NightLightRemoteSensing #EarthObservation #VIIRS_DNB

    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
    skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    You might have seen previous studies (including several from me) showing that lighting on the country and continental scale is increasing. Globally, the rate of increase is about 2% per year.

    Those studies looked at (very) large areas, and used monthly or annual composite images. The new study analyzes change at the spatial scale of individual pixels (~0.5 square km) and at the temporal scale of individual nights.

    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

      You might have seen previous studies (including several from me) showing that lighting on the country and continental scale is increasing. Globally, the rate of increase is about 2% per year.

      Those studies looked at (very) large areas, and used monthly or annual composite images. The new study analyzes change at the spatial scale of individual pixels (~0.5 square km) and at the temporal scale of individual nights.

      skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      That's like... A whole lot of work. A mindbogglingly large amount of work.

      There were 1.16 million daily (NASA Black Marble) *images*. Now think about how many pixels make up each image... ๐Ÿคฏ

      skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

        That's like... A whole lot of work. A mindbogglingly large amount of work.

        There were 1.16 million daily (NASA Black Marble) *images*. Now think about how many pixels make up each image... ๐Ÿคฏ

        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
        skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        For each pixel, the lead author Tian Li from the University of Connecticut fits a trend line (solid line left) and generates a prediction (dotted line left).

        When something changes, the observations stop agreeing with the prediction (middle). If the change persists for at least 14 consecutive observations, then a break point in the trend is assigned. From that point on, a new model predicts future changes. And so on and so forth (right) for the following years.

        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

          For each pixel, the lead author Tian Li from the University of Connecticut fits a trend line (solid line left) and generates a prediction (dotted line left).

          When something changes, the observations stop agreeing with the prediction (middle). If the change persists for at least 14 consecutive observations, then a break point in the trend is assigned. From that point on, a new model predicts future changes. And so on and so forth (right) for the following years.

          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          This is where looking at the daily data (rather than monthly composites) becomes a REALLY BIG DEAL.

          Nighttime lights data are really noisy. Part of the noise comes about because the satellite can view a scene from different directions. When that happens, it's viewing LITERALLY DIFFERENT LIGHTS, as in the aerial photos here.

          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

            This is where looking at the daily data (rather than monthly composites) becomes a REALLY BIG DEAL.

            Nighttime lights data are really noisy. Part of the noise comes about because the satellite can view a scene from different directions. When that happens, it's viewing LITERALLY DIFFERENT LIGHTS, as in the aerial photos here.

            skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
            skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
            skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            For that reason, in the new analysis the data is broken up and fitted separately depending on the viewing zenith angle (angle from straight down). This helps deal with the fact that city centers are typically brightest when viewed from above (and dimmer from the side), while the opposite is true of residential neighborhoods.

            glasspusher@beige.partyG skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS eldang@weirder.earthE 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

              For that reason, in the new analysis the data is broken up and fitted separately depending on the viewing zenith angle (angle from straight down). This helps deal with the fact that city centers are typically brightest when viewed from above (and dimmer from the side), while the opposite is true of residential neighborhoods.

              glasspusher@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              glasspusher@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              glasspusher@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @skyglowberlin very interesting, and as an amateur astronomer, depressing. Thanks

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                For that reason, in the new analysis the data is broken up and fitted separately depending on the viewing zenith angle (angle from straight down). This helps deal with the fact that city centers are typically brightest when viewed from above (and dimmer from the side), while the opposite is true of residential neighborhoods.

                skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                You're probably now saying "enough of what you did I want results!"

                So here's the main finding: yes, Earth is getting brighter on average. But it's certainly not getting brighter everywhere - there are lots of places where light emissions are decreasing!

                Here's the "gradually changing" areas in Berlin, for example. Within the city, there are places and neighborhoods that are brightening, and others that are darkening!

                skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                  You're probably now saying "enough of what you did I want results!"

                  So here's the main finding: yes, Earth is getting brighter on average. But it's certainly not getting brighter everywhere - there are lots of places where light emissions are decreasing!

                  Here's the "gradually changing" areas in Berlin, for example. Within the city, there are places and neighborhoods that are brightening, and others that are darkening!

                  skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  And here's Paris.

                  Out of wealthy countries that aren't in crisis, France stands out for really dramatic reductions in total light emissions. Partly this is due to their light pollution law, and partly it's because so many communities in France now turn off their streetlights late at night when there's no one on the street to see them.

                  skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                    And here's Paris.

                    Out of wealthy countries that aren't in crisis, France stands out for really dramatic reductions in total light emissions. Partly this is due to their light pollution law, and partly it's because so many communities in France now turn off their streetlights late at night when there's no one on the street to see them.

                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    In 2022, the light emissions (during 1-4 am) in France were only 33% of what they were in 2014!

                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                      For that reason, in the new analysis the data is broken up and fitted separately depending on the viewing zenith angle (angle from straight down). This helps deal with the fact that city centers are typically brightest when viewed from above (and dimmer from the side), while the opposite is true of residential neighborhoods.

                      eldang@weirder.earthE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eldang@weirder.earthE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eldang@weirder.earth
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @skyglowberlin This is fascinating, thank you for getting into the weeds a bit. I'm so used to just treating satellite imagery as though it's from the zenith; I'm accustomed to season mattering, and sun angle in daytime images, but I just hadn't thought about this aspect of the challenge in your kind of work.

                      skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                        In 2022, the light emissions (during 1-4 am) in France were only 33% of what they were in 2014!

                        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        Chinese cities, on the other hand, are brightening incredibly rapidly. The total light emission from China grew by 56% during 2014-2022. (Reminder: we're only measured well after midnight. We don't know what's going on during the early parts of the night.)

                        Almost 30% of the increase in total light emissions for the entire world took place in China.

                        skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                          Chinese cities, on the other hand, are brightening incredibly rapidly. The total light emission from China grew by 56% during 2014-2022. (Reminder: we're only measured well after midnight. We don't know what's going on during the early parts of the night.)

                          Almost 30% of the increase in total light emissions for the entire world took place in China.

                          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                          skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #13

                          By the way - you can look at the data yourself! The team from UConn built a viewer that allows you to see abrupt (left) and gradual (right) changes, as for Houston, USA below: https://ee-downloading.projects.earthengine.app/view/alan-change

                          That's what I made the images in the thread with. #RemoteSensing #LightPollution #GIS #GEE

                          skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                            By the way - you can look at the data yourself! The team from UConn built a viewer that allows you to see abrupt (left) and gradual (right) changes, as for Houston, USA below: https://ee-downloading.projects.earthengine.app/view/alan-change

                            That's what I made the images in the thread with. #RemoteSensing #LightPollution #GIS #GEE

                            skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #14

                            Long story short - it's a really cool analysis, it's a very cool paper, and you should read it!

                            I'm very grateful to Tian Li and Zhe Zhu from #UConn and Zhuosen Wang from NASA for involving me and my (former @GFZ) colleague Theres Kuester in the work. And also very grateful to @GFZ, #ESA, and especially @ruhr-uni-bochum.de for making it possible for me to work in this field!

                            skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • eldang@weirder.earthE eldang@weirder.earth

                              @skyglowberlin This is fascinating, thank you for getting into the weeds a bit. I'm so used to just treating satellite imagery as though it's from the zenith; I'm accustomed to season mattering, and sun angle in daytime images, but I just hadn't thought about this aspect of the challenge in your kind of work.

                              skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                              skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                              skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #15

                              @eldang It has an effect on daytime imagery as well, but it's an extra special giant mess during the night.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                                Long story short - it's a really cool analysis, it's a very cool paper, and you should read it!

                                I'm very grateful to Tian Li and Zhe Zhu from #UConn and Zhuosen Wang from NASA for involving me and my (former @GFZ) colleague Theres Kuester in the work. And also very grateful to @GFZ, #ESA, and especially @ruhr-uni-bochum.de for making it possible for me to work in this field!

                                skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #16

                                Oh, wait, I forgot to say something important...

                                Remember when I said that the satellite pixels cover half a square kilometer? That really limits our ability to understand exactly what it is that is changing.

                                I'm part of a group that will propose a nighttime light satellite with unprecedented sensitivity to #ESA for consideration as their #EarthExplorer 13 mission. It would allow us to understand the nature of these changes far better (e.g. who exactly is responsible for the changes? Are whole areas changing gradually, or are we seeing the impact of specific buildings or parking lots?)

                                So, please cross your fingers for us, and if you would be interested in using such data, please reach out ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS skyglowberlin@fediscience.org

                                  A paper that I co-authored was just published (#OpenAccess) a few minutes ago in Nature ๐ŸŽ‰ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10260-w

                                  Here's a short thread about what we did and what we learned ๐Ÿ‘‡

                                  #LightPollution #Energy #ALAN #RemoteSensing #NightLightRemoteSensing #EarthObservation #VIIRS_DNB

                                  notsoloud@expressional.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  notsoloud@expressional.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  notsoloud@expressional.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #17

                                  @skyglowberlin
                                  Wow, front page! Congrats! And thanks for sharing here ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

                                  skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • notsoloud@expressional.socialN notsoloud@expressional.social

                                    @skyglowberlin
                                    Wow, front page! Congrats! And thanks for sharing here ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

                                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    skyglowberlin@fediscience.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #18

                                    @notsoloud Thank you ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mjack@mastodon.bsd.cafeM mjack@mastodon.bsd.cafe shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • ร†ldste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til รฆldste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populรฆre
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper