Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. HEY.

HEY.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
59 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

    HEY.

    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
    davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #17

    @PsyChuan and people keep invoking it when they're actually talking about enclosure. Like how the internet as people use it exists at the whim of a few companies.

    (Possibly what inspired your post? Not new info to anyone here in any case. Just AAAARGH)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV vocumsineratio@hachyderm.io

      @PsyChuan

      My apologies for the ask:

      What's the right starting point for reading Ostrom's work? Her 1990 "Governing the Commons" paper, or do I need to go further back than that?

      nicopap@tooting.chN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicopap@tooting.chN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicopap@tooting.ch
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #18

      @vocumsineratio @PsyChuan the start and end of the books might be a bit thick in economic modelling, and might feel offputting. But after the first chapter, it's just practical examples after practical examples that are quite fascinating.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

        HEY.

        whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

        - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

        - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

        - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
        aurochs@todon.eu
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #19

        @PsyChuan The tragedy of the commons is absolutely real and a real problem. There are milions of exsmples.
        It is the capitalist solution to it that is bulshit.

        whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dalius_berger@plush.cityD dalius_berger@plush.city

          @PsyChuan I think there are two ways to view that term:
          (A): "you can trust citizens with free stuff"
          (B): "you can't trust corporations with free stuff"

          (A) is used to argue against public transport, welfare, healthcare system, affordable housing and the terrible belief that monetizing everything is a solution to fairly distribute resources.

          But (B) is just the observation of corporate greed.

          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
          davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #20

          @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

          A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

          When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

          Metering did help find leaks though.

          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD nacly@floss.socialN 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

            @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

            A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

            When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

            Metering did help find leaks though.

            davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
            davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
            davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #21

            @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

            The biggest problem really was that the water infrastructure had been let degrade to the point where about 60% of treated water was leaking into the ground.

            This was happening both sides of domestic boundaries.

            But not only was introducing charges political suicide during austerity, the paternalistic attitude to the public was just that, and people weren't overusing water just because they could.

            The current biggest issue is malfunctioning toilets, I believe.

            ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

              HEY.

              whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

              - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

              - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

              - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

              toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
              toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
              toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #22

              @PsyChuan It's usually cited as an issue with socialised resources where maintenance of that resource has been left up to individuals operating under capitalism, rather than also socialising the maintenance of the shared resource.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                HEY.

                whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
                stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
                stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #23

                @PsyChuan there's also two different ways to apply the idea! There's the way it's commonly employed as a "gotcha" for lefties where you say "see it's impossible to hold things in common" and then there's the more abstract application of "small harms which are insignificant at an individual scale can become a big problem when an entire society is doing it"

                stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe

                  @PsyChuan there's also two different ways to apply the idea! There's the way it's commonly employed as a "gotcha" for lefties where you say "see it's impossible to hold things in common" and then there's the more abstract application of "small harms which are insignificant at an individual scale can become a big problem when an entire society is doing it"

                  stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #24

                  @PsyChuan in both cases the solution is to coordinate. who knew

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • corbden@defcon.socialC corbden@defcon.social

                    @SallyStrange @PsyChuan Yeah, I feel like that's the tragedy itself. Someone DID come along and steal the commons. And then justified it with the theory. But it did happen.

                    One of those paradoxical thoughts.

                    sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sabik@rants.au
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #25

                    @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan
                    Basically, the tragedy of the commons is elite panic?

                    ooze@wirejunkie.netO 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sabik@rants.auS sabik@rants.au

                      @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan
                      Basically, the tragedy of the commons is elite panic?

                      ooze@wirejunkie.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ooze@wirejunkie.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ooze@wirejunkie.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #26

                      @sabik @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan 100%

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                        HEY.

                        whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                        - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                        - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                        - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                        konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                        konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                        konosocio@mastodon.online
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #27

                        @PsyChuan I hereby put forward that we do not differentiate between author and ouvre when it comes to research and science. Assholes breed asshole ideas.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                          HEY.

                          whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                          - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                          - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                          - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                          bart@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bart@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bart@todon.eu
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #28

                          @PsyChuan

                          millions of years.
                          Private Property of land is the newest, shortest and most dysfuntional concept in the history of humankind

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0x4d6165@transfem.social0 0x4d6165@transfem.social

                            @PsyChuan@plush.city they're telling on themselves

                            alpinefolk@sunbeam.cityA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alpinefolk@sunbeam.cityA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alpinefolk@sunbeam.city
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #29

                            @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan when I read the tragedy of the commons my first thought was ‘letting companies profit from common resources is a bad idea. We should manage them collectively’.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                              HEY.

                              whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                              - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                              - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                              - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                              marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #30

                              @PsyChuan Common ownership can work, just like you can get an agreed optimal Prisoners Dilemma. However, even without enclosure by some external actor (such as occurred in the Scottish highlands), it can end in a tragegic outcome. A clear example is in our repeated failures in different fisheries to agree to manage fish stocks sustainably.

                              whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                HEY.

                                whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                qybat@batchats.net
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #31

                                @PsyChuan The commons worked because everyone was taking from it as much as they personally needed.

                                It fails when someone builds a factory next to the commons and is obliged to maximise their extraction to meet shareholder targets.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                  HEY.

                                  whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                  - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                  - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                  - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                  witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  witchescauldron@kolektiva.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #32

                                  @PsyChuan caverate, its only bullshit if you live outside capitalism. From inside the current mess it is still badly relevant.

                                  We need social composting

                                  ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                                    @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

                                    The biggest problem really was that the water infrastructure had been let degrade to the point where about 60% of treated water was leaking into the ground.

                                    This was happening both sides of domestic boundaries.

                                    But not only was introducing charges political suicide during austerity, the paternalistic attitude to the public was just that, and people weren't overusing water just because they could.

                                    The current biggest issue is malfunctioning toilets, I believe.

                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #33

                                    @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Yes, and many modern toilets have leaky valves that mean you have to replace the entire flush unit because either it's a sealed unit or the particular size and design of valve is no longer available. The older toilets, whilst using more water, tended to be easier to fix

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                                      @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

                                      A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

                                      When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

                                      Metering did help find leaks though.

                                      nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nacly@floss.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #34

                                      @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Amazing story, thank you for sharing!

                                      Can you share some further readings so that I can read more about this?

                                      davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                        @PsyChuan caverate, its only bullshit if you live outside capitalism. From inside the current mess it is still badly relevant.

                                        We need social composting

                                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #35

                                        @witchescauldron @PsyChuan You CAN have some forms of capitalism whilst still regulating the commons for everyone's benefit, I believe. But it does need restraint and legal restriction to do so. Personally, I would probably prefer Capitalism as we have it now to be dismantled, but there doesn't appear to be enough people to agree with me, so we might have to work on the legal and practical regulation.

                                        whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                          HEY.

                                          whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                          - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                          - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                          - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                          bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bearsong@ravenation.club
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #36

                                          @PsyChuan

                                          thank you for this clear & concise summary

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper