Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. You know what else about AI?

You know what else about AI?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
29 Indlæg 21 Posters 116 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD davidhmccoy@mastodon.world

    @jilleduffy

    It’s an interesting conundrum. I’m pretty skeptical of AI in software development. But there are things I consider to be grunt work. I have to issue with that stuff be automated.

    For example, RowMappers in JDBCTemplates. No interest in spending 40 or so minutes typing up one mapped to 18 columns in a table. Or creating a prototype GUI in React.

    jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jilleduffy@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    @davidhmccoy This is the thing. AI might be fine for looking at large data sets of medical images, for example, and finding commonalities among images that did or did not develop into cancer 5 years later. That is a great use case. There may be other great use cases in a very specific profession, such as software development. But that is not what AI "hype" is. The hype says "if you don't figure out how to use it in ALL of your jobs, you will be left behind."

    davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD E marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM sabik@rants.auS 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

      @davidhmccoy This is the thing. AI might be fine for looking at large data sets of medical images, for example, and finding commonalities among images that did or did not develop into cancer 5 years later. That is a great use case. There may be other great use cases in a very specific profession, such as software development. But that is not what AI "hype" is. The hype says "if you don't figure out how to use it in ALL of your jobs, you will be left behind."

      davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidhmccoy@mastodon.world
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @jilleduffy

      💯. It is insane how much they are pushing it at my job. This one manager asked a coworker to use AI to shorten 4 sentences into bullet points.

      Four.

      architektdiewelt@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

        Knowledge workers who are highly productive balance the "mindless" i.e., easy or low-focus, work with the hard stuff. We work it into our day so that the low-focus tasks provide us with a break. That break is integral to getting back to the high-focus work

        davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidhmccoy@mastodon.world
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @jilleduffy

        Full agreement. I use mindless stuff as a mental palate cleanser. Allows me to zone out a little before re-engaging my brain.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

          You know what else about AI?

          People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

          We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

          If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

          canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          canleaf@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @jilleduffy Remember: AI is pushed by big oil and the nuclear lobby to stay relevant.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

            You know what else about AI?

            People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

            We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

            If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

            hopeless@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
            hopeless@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
            hopeless@mas.to
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @jilleduffy The evolution of the "case against AI" has been very interesting to watch.

            At first it was dismissive, then it went through a "boiling the oceans" phase, then it was "based on stealing", then people who don't use it are Ethical Heroes, then it got kettled in detail like "Claude code quality experts", then it was "hey everyone look at me, I will never use it", then copy.fail & co.

            Now: "you'll work harder".

            Yes. But you will also get a lot of previously impossible shit done.

            mu@mastodon.nzM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hopeless@mas.toH hopeless@mas.to

              @jilleduffy The evolution of the "case against AI" has been very interesting to watch.

              At first it was dismissive, then it went through a "boiling the oceans" phase, then it was "based on stealing", then people who don't use it are Ethical Heroes, then it got kettled in detail like "Claude code quality experts", then it was "hey everyone look at me, I will never use it", then copy.fail & co.

              Now: "you'll work harder".

              Yes. But you will also get a lot of previously impossible shit done.

              mu@mastodon.nzM This user is from outside of this forum
              mu@mastodon.nzM This user is from outside of this forum
              mu@mastodon.nz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @hopeless @jilleduffy none of that other stuff has been resolved.

              hopeless@mas.toH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                Knowledge workers who are highly productive balance the "mindless" i.e., easy or low-focus, work with the hard stuff. We work it into our day so that the low-focus tasks provide us with a break. That break is integral to getting back to the high-focus work

                konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                konosocio@mastodon.online
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @jilleduffy I would argue that on top of that it increases the amount of high focus work, like proof reading AI output.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                  Knowledge workers who are highly productive balance the "mindless" i.e., easy or low-focus, work with the hard stuff. We work it into our day so that the low-focus tasks provide us with a break. That break is integral to getting back to the high-focus work

                  vonxylofon@witter.czV This user is from outside of this forum
                  vonxylofon@witter.czV This user is from outside of this forum
                  vonxylofon@witter.cz
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @jilleduffy What agentic development will do to human psyche will not be pretty.

                  Having said that, as a project manager with ADHD + some undiagnosed conditions thrown in, I must concede Gemini has been a life saver for me.

                  "Whose job is to do X?"

                  "What is the latest agreement on Y?"

                  "Did we ever cover this or that eventuality?"

                  "What does Z mean?"

                  All with sources, and while it's imprecise enough I don't trust it, I usually have enough to do the thing and confirm with the person.

                  (cont.)

                  vonxylofon@witter.czV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                    You know what else about AI?

                    People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                    We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                    If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                    1div0@mastodon.social1 This user is from outside of this forum
                    1div0@mastodon.social1 This user is from outside of this forum
                    1div0@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @jilleduffy Shining bright, but shorter. By design.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vonxylofon@witter.czV vonxylofon@witter.cz

                      @jilleduffy What agentic development will do to human psyche will not be pretty.

                      Having said that, as a project manager with ADHD + some undiagnosed conditions thrown in, I must concede Gemini has been a life saver for me.

                      "Whose job is to do X?"

                      "What is the latest agreement on Y?"

                      "Did we ever cover this or that eventuality?"

                      "What does Z mean?"

                      All with sources, and while it's imprecise enough I don't trust it, I usually have enough to do the thing and confirm with the person.

                      (cont.)

                      vonxylofon@witter.czV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vonxylofon@witter.czV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vonxylofon@witter.cz
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @jilleduffy While I write all my e-mail, tickets, and related things, what it automates for me is the hard stuff: remembering, orienting among dozens of meetings I attend, keeping track of things, the lot.

                      All of these have always been killing me, and being able to focus on the problem solving has actually been liberating.

                      Sure, none of this offsets the environmental damage, costs, endangered livelihoods, or copyright infringement.

                      Typed on my oppressive device filled with rare metals.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                        You know what else about AI?

                        People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                        We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                        If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                        cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cdlhamma@hachyderm.io
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        @jilleduffy interesting I hadn’t thought of that and I’ve been feeling this recently. I’ve been using it to handle low hanging fruit. I only recently started using it more.

                        cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                          You know what else about AI?

                          People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                          We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                          If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #16

                          @jilleduffy

                          When they say "mindless parts of work", these fossil fuel funded fascist tech bros often mean work done by women, immigrants, POC, & the young.

                          These are the jobs seen as "pointless" by billionaires.

                          https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2026/03/17/study-finds-women-at-greater-risk-as-ai-reshapes-jobs-heres-how-to-stay-ahead/

                          https://www.ft.com/content/946650d6-f61f-4b98-8bb5-c0020c8a205f
                          https://archive.is/3FOVC

                          https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/06/29/womens-jobs-will-be-disproportionately-affected-by-ai-according-to-new-research

                          https://www.businessinsider.com/recent-company-layoffs-laying-off-workers-2025

                          The GOP's war on women includes a war on their employment like teaching, health care, retail, & clerical work.

                          https://www.newsweek.com/nursing-not-professional-degree-trump-admin-11079650

                          https://mashable.com/article/ai-alpha-school-trump-administration

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC cdlhamma@hachyderm.io

                            @jilleduffy interesting I hadn’t thought of that and I’ve been feeling this recently. I’ve been using it to handle low hanging fruit. I only recently started using it more.

                            cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cdlhamma@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cdlhamma@hachyderm.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #17

                            @jilleduffy this in combination with meaningless RTO is killing me apparently.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                              You know what else about AI?

                              People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                              We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                              If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                              primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              primo@donphan.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              primo@donphan.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #18

                              @jilleduffy I think there was an article of the MIT that stated something similar, calling for making sure workers take meaningfull breaks without having something run in the background to prevent burnout.
                              Though they were looking at it from a different perspective, that is people picking up work outside their expertise (they failed to address the problem of the worker being unable to check the correctness on processes they are unfamiliar with wiith, which is a yikes from me)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                                @davidhmccoy This is the thing. AI might be fine for looking at large data sets of medical images, for example, and finding commonalities among images that did or did not develop into cancer 5 years later. That is a great use case. There may be other great use cases in a very specific profession, such as software development. But that is not what AI "hype" is. The hype says "if you don't figure out how to use it in ALL of your jobs, you will be left behind."

                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                ef@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #19

                                @jilleduffy @davidhmccoy very much agree with this sentiment. #AIslop where the expertise is removed and people told not to question the #slop output is bizarre at best. Human experience is where cometency is gained, not solely through injesting books or data sources.

                                Doing pattern matching with experts reviewing the output is a reasonable application. But these still need validation and potentially just open up different approaches rather than provide answers per se.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD davidhmccoy@mastodon.world

                                  @jilleduffy

                                  💯. It is insane how much they are pushing it at my job. This one manager asked a coworker to use AI to shorten 4 sentences into bullet points.

                                  Four.

                                  architektdiewelt@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  architektdiewelt@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  architektdiewelt@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #20

                                  @davidhmccoy @jilleduffy I know people who generate tickets in Jira using AI which results in terrible quality and no one knows what to do, however they still believe it’s valuable to do so and won’t stop.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • impudentstrumpet@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    impudentstrumpet@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    impudentstrumpet@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #21

                                    @bignose @jilleduffy I like this infant analogy!

                                    If you don't hang out with the infant doing everyday stuff and are only parachuted in when they're crying, you'll have no idea why they're crying!

                                    Whereas if you're there all the time, you can go straight to "Oh, that's their 'I need to be burped again' face". And can probably even automatically prevent the crying by recognizing the face before the crying starts

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                                      You know what else about AI?

                                      People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                                      We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                                      If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                                      bartfoss42@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bartfoss42@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bartfoss42@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #22

                                      @jilleduffy Agree, good post. People also tend to forget that the "mindless parts" are a great way to introduce juniors or new hires into a project or whatever.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                                        You know what else about AI?

                                        People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                                        We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                                        If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                                        kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #23

                                        @jilleduffy yeah I agree, there is also another challenge, big tech giants are well positioned to take complete leverage from modern tech upgrades like MCP and using it as a paid service and doing tasks like web automation on the contrary individuals are restricted by buzz words like this is spam, privacy violations etc. double standards

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                                          You know what else about AI?

                                          People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                                          We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                                          If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                                          karkariza@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #24

                                          @jilleduffy

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper