Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
europeeupoleuropol
10 Indlæg 8 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    anttipeltola@mastodon.world
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

    Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

    No gods. No masters. ✊

    #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

    uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW kithrup@wandering.shopK hyc@mastodon.socialH _amol_@fosstodon.org_ 7 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

      Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

      Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

      No gods. No masters. ✊

      #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

      uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
      uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
      uriel@x.keinpfusch.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @anttipeltola I am sure they will obey you.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

        Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

        Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

        No gods. No masters. ✊

        #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

        witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        witchescauldron@kolektiva.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @anttipeltola the #4opens is a good test.

        Use #4opens as a litmus test, not a manifesto. It works best like this: “Cool project. Let’s do a quick sanity check.” is it: Open code? Open data? Open standards? Open governance? If the answers get vague, defensive, or managerial, that’s your signal. You don’t need to argue, simply don’t invest trust or energy. Capture starves quietly when it isn’t fed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

          Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

          Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

          No gods. No masters. ✊

          #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

          kithrup@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
          kithrup@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
          kithrup@wandering.shop
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @anttipeltola I've been a big fan of open standards since just after the term "open software" came into being.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

            Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

            Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

            No gods. No masters. ✊

            #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

            hyc@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            hyc@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            hyc@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @anttipeltola further decentralization would be beneficial too. That would be best served with self-hosting, which also would benefit from symmetric internet speeds, and by now, it would need IPv6 everywhere.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

              Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

              Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

              No gods. No masters. ✊

              #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

              _amol_@fosstodon.org_ This user is from outside of this forum
              _amol_@fosstodon.org_ This user is from outside of this forum
              _amol_@fosstodon.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @anttipeltola I share your values, but the issue in that plan is that big moonshots and major technical improvements need multi year huge investments at loss. And that requires a company with a big enough budget that it can afford that loss.

              So if we don’t want big techs we need to find another model to fund big moonshots.

              anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • _amol_@fosstodon.org_ _amol_@fosstodon.org

                @anttipeltola I share your values, but the issue in that plan is that big moonshots and major technical improvements need multi year huge investments at loss. And that requires a company with a big enough budget that it can afford that loss.

                So if we don’t want big techs we need to find another model to fund big moonshots.

                anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                anttipeltola@mastodon.world
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @_amol_

                Most of the open-source software you are using was built with little to no external funding. Mainly volunteer work. Giving a few million EUR grants to these projects is nothing for European governments.

                _amol_@fosstodon.org_ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

                  @_amol_

                  Most of the open-source software you are using was built with little to no external funding. Mainly volunteer work. Giving a few million EUR grants to these projects is nothing for European governments.

                  _amol_@fosstodon.org_ This user is from outside of this forum
                  _amol_@fosstodon.org_ This user is from outside of this forum
                  _amol_@fosstodon.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @anttipeltola I am an open source maintainer myself. Even on some projects with significant funding. “Volunteer work” is not a sustainable model. I maintain OSS software in my spare time and when I have the energy to do so. But that’s not what pays my bills and I honestly know zero OSS maintainers that are able to live decently purely on donations

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

                    Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

                    Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

                    No gods. No masters. ✊

                    #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

                    jaymoore@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaymoore@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaymoore@genomic.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @anttipeltola something German/Scandinavian would be good. Well designed and built, decentralized by nature, green in intent and inherently nonviolent. Tech as public utility. Not for profit.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • anttipeltola@mastodon.worldA anttipeltola@mastodon.world

                      Whatever this European tech sovereignty formulates into DO NOT give us European Big Tech.

                      Open protocols, open standards, open source. Like the 1990s internet I enjoyed as a kid. The European governments finance the projects and largely leave us the fuck alone.

                      No gods. No masters. ✊

                      #EU #Europe #EUPol #EuroPol

                      liw@toot.liw.fiL This user is from outside of this forum
                      liw@toot.liw.fiL This user is from outside of this forum
                      liw@toot.liw.fi
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @anttipeltola I agree. A problem with very big companies I see is that they're hard to regulate. Another is that they tend to not serve the people using them. An ecosystem with a small number of very big players seems inherently less healthy and less likely to cope with disasters than one with many players of different size, which can still collaborate.

                      Very, very large projects are easier for very, very big players. But still possible by collaboration among smaller players.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • anderslund@expressional.socialA anderslund@expressional.social shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper