Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Can you count the war crime intent admissions

Can you count the war crime intent admissions

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
7 Indlæg 3 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
    b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
    b9ace@todon.eu
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Can you count the war crime intent admissions?
    Can you imagine the number of tens of millions civilians therein threatened with up to including intentionally caused mass-deaths?
    I'll remind you that even the THREAT of such "use of force" (in context meaning acts of war) is a violation of the UN Charter.

    b9ace@todon.euB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • b9ace@todon.euB b9ace@todon.eu

      Can you count the war crime intent admissions?
      Can you imagine the number of tens of millions civilians therein threatened with up to including intentionally caused mass-deaths?
      I'll remind you that even the THREAT of such "use of force" (in context meaning acts of war) is a violation of the UN Charter.

      b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
      b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
      b9ace@todon.eu
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      USA is a Rogue State.
      That was also the reason USA got a UNSC mandate to invade Iraq 1991, because Saddam committed an illegal war of aggression against Kuwait for economic and political profit, occupation and eventually annexation. Sound familiar? Sound like some States you know of now? At least 4 at the top of my head, probably more.
      Will USA also invade itself to end the crimes against peace and crimes against humanity now?

      b9ace@todon.euB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • b9ace@todon.euB b9ace@todon.eu

        USA is a Rogue State.
        That was also the reason USA got a UNSC mandate to invade Iraq 1991, because Saddam committed an illegal war of aggression against Kuwait for economic and political profit, occupation and eventually annexation. Sound familiar? Sound like some States you know of now? At least 4 at the top of my head, probably more.
        Will USA also invade itself to end the crimes against peace and crimes against humanity now?

        b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
        b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
        b9ace@todon.eu
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        The very stable genius is volatile mad.
        Again threatens further crimes against humanity, as part of the crimes against peace.

        Hmm. Why "Fuckin’" not "Fucking"? Is "Fuckin'" not fucking swearing just as much?
        Who are "you" here, is it the civilians whose life essential infrastructure you threaten to large-scale intentionally war crime devastate, or is it all of the world whose access to medicine, food, fuels, etc you personally have caused to be blocked?

        notyourfanboy@kolektiva.socialN b9ace@todon.euB 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • b9ace@todon.euB b9ace@todon.eu

          The very stable genius is volatile mad.
          Again threatens further crimes against humanity, as part of the crimes against peace.

          Hmm. Why "Fuckin’" not "Fucking"? Is "Fuckin'" not fucking swearing just as much?
          Who are "you" here, is it the civilians whose life essential infrastructure you threaten to large-scale intentionally war crime devastate, or is it all of the world whose access to medicine, food, fuels, etc you personally have caused to be blocked?

          notyourfanboy@kolektiva.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          notyourfanboy@kolektiva.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          notyourfanboy@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @b9AcE
          CW that trash

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • b9ace@todon.euB b9ace@todon.eu

            The very stable genius is volatile mad.
            Again threatens further crimes against humanity, as part of the crimes against peace.

            Hmm. Why "Fuckin’" not "Fucking"? Is "Fuckin'" not fucking swearing just as much?
            Who are "you" here, is it the civilians whose life essential infrastructure you threaten to large-scale intentionally war crime devastate, or is it all of the world whose access to medicine, food, fuels, etc you personally have caused to be blocked?

            b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
            b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
            b9ace@todon.eu
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            'Trump says 'entire' Iran could be 'taken out' Tuesday'
            https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/world-news/922062/trump-says-39entire39-iran-could-be-39taken-out39-tuesday/en?src=rss&utm_source=TheWALL360&utm_medium=Rss-articles&utm_campaign=rss&utm_term=Rss
            ...again threatening further crimes against humanity on top of the crimes against peace.

            roadblock161_@ni.hil.istR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • b9ace@todon.euB b9ace@todon.eu

              'Trump says 'entire' Iran could be 'taken out' Tuesday'
              https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/world-news/922062/trump-says-39entire39-iran-could-be-39taken-out39-tuesday/en?src=rss&utm_source=TheWALL360&utm_medium=Rss-articles&utm_campaign=rss&utm_term=Rss
              ...again threatening further crimes against humanity on top of the crimes against peace.

              roadblock161_@ni.hil.istR This user is from outside of this forum
              roadblock161_@ni.hil.istR This user is from outside of this forum
              roadblock161_@ni.hil.ist
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @b9AcE you think he'll back down again or will they really go through with it this time?

              b9ace@todon.euB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • roadblock161_@ni.hil.istR roadblock161_@ni.hil.ist

                @b9AcE you think he'll back down again or will they really go through with it this time?

                b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                b9ace@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                b9ace@todon.eu
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @roadblock161_ I really don't know. Trump can't admit loss because loss would mean lost prestige and that's authoritarians' primary currency for maintaining entourage, while on the other hand the Iran-theocracy can't back down because then they may get lynched or sentenced to hang.
                It seems slightly more likely to me Trump will see no other way out than to commit one of the world's worst war crimes campaigns ever than that the Iran-theocracy surrender to likely lynching,
                unless of course Trump changes the terms of the deal to just accept a white peace, if the Iran-regime even would accept that by now, but then a white peace too will just be (correctly) presented by Trump's opponents as a loss anyway.

                Soo... I wish it wasn't so, but currently it leans towards obliteration, I believe.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone shared this topic
                Svar
                • Svar som emne
                Login for at svare
                • Ældste til nyeste
                • Nyeste til ældste
                • Most Votes


                • Log ind

                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Hjem
                • Seneste
                • Etiketter
                • Populære
                • Verden
                • Bruger
                • Grupper