ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address.
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
@evacide perfect for malvertizing
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
@evacide not at all, no… https://youtu.be/buVDDbjFCBc?si=x0qcYdxhKmx-4UG0
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
@evacide Do you have in mind one or more specific viable workarounds for the 25K matched users requirement, or specific reasons why that is not the barrier it would seem to be?
Not asking you to share what those might BE, as obviously there are good reasons not to share the details of abuse methodology.
(And if you say “no, I just expect these barriers to be worked around,” that will not make me assume it is all safe and good.)
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
@evacide Do you think, the minimum number of 25.000 adresses targeted helps? I would expect that at least personal harrassment gets harder with this requirement. But I'm not sure if I'm missing something.
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
@evacide Don't use chatGPT
-
@evacide Do you have in mind one or more specific viable workarounds for the 25K matched users requirement, or specific reasons why that is not the barrier it would seem to be?
Not asking you to share what those might BE, as obviously there are good reasons not to share the details of abuse methodology.
(And if you say “no, I just expect these barriers to be worked around,” that will not make me assume it is all safe and good.)
@tphinney I can think of some workarounds, but I also think that harassing 25k people is bad.
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
-
@evacide Do you think, the minimum number of 25.000 adresses targeted helps? I would expect that at least personal harrassment gets harder with this requirement. But I'm not sure if I'm missing something.
-
ChatGPT now lets you target ads based on specific prompts or any phone number or email address. This is absolutely 100% going to be used for harassment.
https://www.404media.co/how-chatgpt-targets-ads-to-you-based-on-your-prompts-phone-number-and-email/
Gosh, I often really want an internet without ads just for artists, nice people, nerds, tech savvy yet social people, happy-to-help-people, scientists, and of course cat lovers.
-
@tphinney I can think of some workarounds, but I also think that harassing 25k people is bad.
@evacide Ah. In my head, I was thinking harassment as being targeting individuals or small groups. But of course it could be large lists of (insert name of outgroup(s) here).
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic