Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I didn't want to be break this story over here but since no one else seems to be posting about it here I am sharing a screenshot from the other side with @scan's post.

I didn't want to be break this story over here but since no one else seems to be posting about it here I am sharing a screenshot from the other side with @scan's post.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
129 Indlæg 45 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

    Because of Open Collective's belief in transparency, you can see directly how much @OpenSourceCollective is paying to use Persona and when those payments started:

    https://opencollective.com/opensource/transactions?searchTerm=persona&kind=ALL

    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.st
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #39

    So yeah, this really seems like they are integrating Persona directly into Open Collective. So even if the fiscal host changes directions here, this seems totally not ok.
    https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/11988

    liaizon@social.wake.stL aslakr@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • abekonge@venner.networkA abekonge@venner.network shared this topic
    • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

      Because of Open Collective's belief in transparency, you can see directly how much @OpenSourceCollective is paying to use Persona and when those payments started:

      https://opencollective.com/opensource/transactions?searchTerm=persona&kind=ALL

      pepijn@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
      pepijn@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
      pepijn@mastodon.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #40

      Huh. The amount of absolutely private data Persona and the companies they sell it to are hovering up is mind boggling.
      With that I assumed companies using their product would be paid for it instead of being the ones paying.

      @liaizon @OpenSourceCollective

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • li@tech.lgbtL li@tech.lgbt

        @havchr @liaizon @scan or hear me out, dont have "proof of identifcation" at all?

        havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH This user is from outside of this forum
        havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH This user is from outside of this forum
        havchr@mastodon.gamedev.place
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #41

        @Li @liaizon @scan I think we are going to need it. Open source will be attacked by bad faith actors which can set up a bot army of "contributors" - the openness we want needs some kind of trust mechanisms. I am not saying this specific case warrants an identification system - just that there are sharks in the water ahead. Say someone wants to infiltrate the forums of KDE, and make a lot of noise and disturb development, they can already. In the future they can x1000 it in volume and distruption

        li@tech.lgbtL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

          So yeah, this really seems like they are integrating Persona directly into Open Collective. So even if the fiscal host changes directions here, this seems totally not ok.
          https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/11988

          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
          liaizon@social.wake.st
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #42

          Soooooo @Mastodon is using @OpenSourceCollective as their fiscal host...

          https://opencollective.com/mastodon

          liaizon@social.wake.stL nextgraph@fosstodon.orgN 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH havchr@mastodon.gamedev.place

            @Li @liaizon @scan I think we are going to need it. Open source will be attacked by bad faith actors which can set up a bot army of "contributors" - the openness we want needs some kind of trust mechanisms. I am not saying this specific case warrants an identification system - just that there are sharks in the water ahead. Say someone wants to infiltrate the forums of KDE, and make a lot of noise and disturb development, they can already. In the future they can x1000 it in volume and distruption

            li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
            li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
            li@tech.lgbt
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #43

            @havchr @liaizon @scan

            look okay we just "need" mass privacy violations, we just *need* to destroy all anominity on these projects, its super important! we just need to discriminate against people who are not 'blessed' by teh state with the privledge of being able to exist.

            yeah; how about no;

            i do not care how 'palletable' you try to make this dystopian bullshit

            please fuck off

            havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

              RE: https://social.wake.st/@liaizon/116206925371202010

              I didn't want to be break this story over here but since no one else seems to be posting about it here I am sharing a screenshot from the other side with @scan's post.

              abekonge@venner.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
              abekonge@venner.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
              abekonge@venner.network
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #44

              @liaizon Ok let's talk strategies for push back - we gotta stop this! @jowek @ukrudt @tak @ruben @magnus

              Making an angry github issue?

              Making a petition signed by a lot of collectives?

              ?? what else?

              liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • li@tech.lgbtL li@tech.lgbt

                @havchr @liaizon @scan

                look okay we just "need" mass privacy violations, we just *need* to destroy all anominity on these projects, its super important! we just need to discriminate against people who are not 'blessed' by teh state with the privledge of being able to exist.

                yeah; how about no;

                i do not care how 'palletable' you try to make this dystopian bullshit

                please fuck off

                havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH This user is from outside of this forum
                havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH This user is from outside of this forum
                havchr@mastodon.gamedev.place
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #45

                @Li @liaizon @scan Look, I am not rooting for any of these things, I am rooting for solutions that can proove personhood _without_ breaching privacy.
                There is a whitepaper about it on the firstperson project web page. The Linux Foundation is one of the initiaters of this work. And in the case of OpenCollective and shipping ID off to Palantir-bros - hell yeah, they can fuck off.

                li@tech.lgbtL clayote@peoplemaking.gamesC 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                  So yeah, this really seems like they are integrating Persona directly into Open Collective. So even if the fiscal host changes directions here, this seems totally not ok.
                  https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/11988

                  aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aslakr@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #46

                  @liaizon A botly hooray

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH havchr@mastodon.gamedev.place

                    @Li @liaizon @scan Look, I am not rooting for any of these things, I am rooting for solutions that can proove personhood _without_ breaching privacy.
                    There is a whitepaper about it on the firstperson project web page. The Linux Foundation is one of the initiaters of this work. And in the case of OpenCollective and shipping ID off to Palantir-bros - hell yeah, they can fuck off.

                    li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                    li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                    li@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #47

                    @havchr @liaizon @scan "proving personhood" again please fuck off with this shit.

                    "proving personhood" means that someone can just decide your not a 'person', or that you are a "person" its discriminatory, and creates extreme power dynamics (which is what IDs are for, the other part is survailence)

                    ive been told for ages im not really a person you know, i don't actually have a magic id card that says i 'count' actually;

                    a person is anything that says it is, fuck you. stop trying to enforce dehumanization actually

                    i don't need to fucking 'prove' to fucking anyone ever; and i hope your system gets hacked to fuck; (i mean, you cant do 'privacy preserving, identify verification'' its self-contradictory)

                    and fuck the linux foundation for enabling this shit too actually

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • havchr@mastodon.gamedev.placeH havchr@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @Li @liaizon @scan Look, I am not rooting for any of these things, I am rooting for solutions that can proove personhood _without_ breaching privacy.
                      There is a whitepaper about it on the firstperson project web page. The Linux Foundation is one of the initiaters of this work. And in the case of OpenCollective and shipping ID off to Palantir-bros - hell yeah, they can fuck off.

                      clayote@peoplemaking.gamesC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clayote@peoplemaking.gamesC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clayote@peoplemaking.games
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #48

                      @havchr @Li @scan How would proving personhood have helped against Jia Tan? That was a real person. Their loyalties weren't where they said they were.

                      liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • clayote@peoplemaking.gamesC clayote@peoplemaking.games

                        @havchr @Li @scan How would proving personhood have helped against Jia Tan? That was a real person. Their loyalties weren't where they said they were.

                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.st
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #49

                        @clayote @havchr @Li can yall stop tagging me in this tangential thread?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                          RE: https://social.wake.st/@liaizon/116206925371202010

                          I didn't want to be break this story over here but since no one else seems to be posting about it here I am sharing a screenshot from the other side with @scan's post.

                          poohlaga@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          poohlaga@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          poohlaga@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #50

                          @liaizon @scan Hi, Lauren here. I'm the ED of OSC and happy to chat. In this expense, the payee was presented with options that would not require a KYC with Persona; they confirmed, so we will be able to pay them through this method. KYC's are a rare edge case for us and are not issued on all expenses.
                          I will publish a general statement on the OSC updates page - but yes. We started using Persona before the news broke. We are currently looking for non-US providers and are open to suggestions.

                          liaizon@social.wake.stL wcbdata@vis.socialW 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • abekonge@venner.networkA abekonge@venner.network

                            @liaizon Ok let's talk strategies for push back - we gotta stop this! @jowek @ukrudt @tak @ruben @magnus

                            Making an angry github issue?

                            Making a petition signed by a lot of collectives?

                            ?? what else?

                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.st
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #51

                            @abekonge @jowek @ukrudt @tak @ruben @magnus
                            the chair of the board of directors of F-Droid just responded to my tag here seemingly in agreement
                            https://social.seabass.systems/@seabass/statuses/01KKHX2849AKSRJSVSN5C04TXP

                            I would say that the MAJORITY of 2714 collectives that OSC fiscal host has would be entirely opposed to being subjected to having to have their personal data sent to Persona. A large majority of them have a presence right here so tagging projects seems like it would definitly stir shit up.

                            liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                              @abekonge @jowek @ukrudt @tak @ruben @magnus
                              the chair of the board of directors of F-Droid just responded to my tag here seemingly in agreement
                              https://social.seabass.systems/@seabass/statuses/01KKHX2849AKSRJSVSN5C04TXP

                              I would say that the MAJORITY of 2714 collectives that OSC fiscal host has would be entirely opposed to being subjected to having to have their personal data sent to Persona. A large majority of them have a presence right here so tagging projects seems like it would definitly stir shit up.

                              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liaizon@social.wake.st
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #52

                              @abekonge @jowek @ukrudt @tak @ruben @magnus

                              An open letter where people can sign their project names about their disapproval of this would probably be a good start though you are right. I wonder what the best way to host that would be?

                              abekonge@venner.networkA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • poohlaga@mastodon.socialP poohlaga@mastodon.social

                                @liaizon @scan Hi, Lauren here. I'm the ED of OSC and happy to chat. In this expense, the payee was presented with options that would not require a KYC with Persona; they confirmed, so we will be able to pay them through this method. KYC's are a rare edge case for us and are not issued on all expenses.
                                I will publish a general statement on the OSC updates page - but yes. We started using Persona before the news broke. We are currently looking for non-US providers and are open to suggestions.

                                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                liaizon@social.wake.st
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #53

                                @poohlaga hi Lauren, sorry to make your acquaintance on such an unpleasant matter. While I am glad to hear that you are using them only in "rare edge cases" it seems that their API is getting directly integrated into Open Collective's code base (https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/11988)

                                I think for the present moment there needs to be a very clear statement about *exactly* how you are using Persona and what data and what edge cases would end up triggering you to initiate sending *any data* to their API.

                                poohlaga@mastodon.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                                  Soooooo @Mastodon is using @OpenSourceCollective as their fiscal host...

                                  https://opencollective.com/mastodon

                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  liaizon@social.wake.st
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #54

                                  RE: https://mastodon.social/@poohlaga/116218374295960280

                                  the Executive Director of @OpenSourceCollective replied:

                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • opsocket@mamot.frO opsocket@mamot.fr

                                    @liaizon what's up @Betree ?

                                    betree@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    betree@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    betree@framapiaf.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #55

                                    @opsocket @liaizon copy-pasting the reply I've made on the Github issue:

                                    We (opencollective.com) are agnostic to the KYC provider that fiscal hosts use. Our integration was built primarily as a manual KYC tool, and you can use any backend you want - or even run your own program.

                                    betree@framapiaf.orgB opsocket@mamot.frO 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • betree@framapiaf.orgB betree@framapiaf.org

                                      @opsocket @liaizon copy-pasting the reply I've made on the Github issue:

                                      We (opencollective.com) are agnostic to the KYC provider that fiscal hosts use. Our integration was built primarily as a manual KYC tool, and you can use any backend you want - or even run your own program.

                                      betree@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      betree@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      betree@framapiaf.org
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #56

                                      @opsocket @liaizon

                                      We're indeed adding a persona integration on the platform to help Open Source Collective manage their KYC program. It is not something we're forcing on anyone, just a bridge we're creating for fiscal hosts relying on this service.

                                      For the rest, I'll let Open Source Collective comment.

                                      They're aware of this thread and are preparing a reply as we speak.

                                      li@tech.lgbtL 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                                        RE: https://mastodon.social/@poohlaga/116218374295960280

                                        the Executive Director of @OpenSourceCollective replied:

                                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        liaizon@social.wake.st
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #57

                                        RE: https://framapiaf.org/@Betree/116218444650414138

                                        the developer who is currently adding this Persona integration into @opencollective has replied to this thread here:

                                        malte@anticapitalist.partyM irishmasms@defcon.socialI 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • betree@framapiaf.orgB betree@framapiaf.org

                                          @opsocket @liaizon copy-pasting the reply I've made on the Github issue:

                                          We (opencollective.com) are agnostic to the KYC provider that fiscal hosts use. Our integration was built primarily as a manual KYC tool, and you can use any backend you want - or even run your own program.

                                          opsocket@mamot.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          opsocket@mamot.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          opsocket@mamot.fr
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #58

                                          @Betree @liaizon I just read it, thanks for trying to shed some light here

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper