Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Hot diggity dog.

Hot diggity dog.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
9 Indlæg 8 Posters 5 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    mttaggart@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Hot diggity dog.

    The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

    https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

    lastdinosaur@lastdinosaur.clubL countholdem@mastodon.socialC twobiscuits@graz.socialT tasket@infosec.exchangeT condret@fedi.absturztau.beC 6 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

      Hot diggity dog.

      The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

      https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

      lastdinosaur@lastdinosaur.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lastdinosaur@lastdinosaur.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lastdinosaur@lastdinosaur.club
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2
      @mttaggart@infosec.exchange

      Prohibition is a losing strategy. they should punitively taxing them instead and redistributing the money wisely.
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        Hot diggity dog.

        The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

        https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

        countholdem@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        countholdem@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        countholdem@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @mttaggart Apropos, since international law is more artificial than organic, nowadays.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

          Hot diggity dog.

          The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

          https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

          twobiscuits@graz.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          twobiscuits@graz.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          twobiscuits@graz.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @mttaggart It also stole Amnesty International's initials ...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

            Hot diggity dog.

            The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

            https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

            tasket@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tasket@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tasket@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @mttaggart Nail this to the door...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

              Hot diggity dog.

              The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

              https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

              condret@fedi.absturztau.beC This user is from outside of this forum
              condret@fedi.absturztau.beC This user is from outside of this forum
              condret@fedi.absturztau.be
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6
              @mttaggart unlawful webscraping, wtf is that supposed to mean
              N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • condret@fedi.absturztau.beC condret@fedi.absturztau.be
                @mttaggart unlawful webscraping, wtf is that supposed to mean
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                nohhue@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @condret @mttaggart Uh, what it says?

                A lot of "AI" models do not respect robots.txt and other "do not scrape this" notices on webpages. Therefore it's an "unlawful" scrape.

                (Conversely, The Internet Archive is running into the opposite problem with journalism/news pages where news pages ask and they can't archive pages because of it)

                condret@fedi.absturztau.beC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                  Hot diggity dog.

                  The briefing concludes that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with [International Human Rights Law]. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems, including where such systems are identified as exacerbating existing inequalities or creating new forms of discrimination.

                  https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/

                  dannotdaniel@hellions.cloudD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dannotdaniel@hellions.cloudD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dannotdaniel@hellions.cloud
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @mttaggart

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N nohhue@mastodon.social

                    @condret @mttaggart Uh, what it says?

                    A lot of "AI" models do not respect robots.txt and other "do not scrape this" notices on webpages. Therefore it's an "unlawful" scrape.

                    (Conversely, The Internet Archive is running into the opposite problem with journalism/news pages where news pages ask and they can't archive pages because of it)

                    condret@fedi.absturztau.beC This user is from outside of this forum
                    condret@fedi.absturztau.beC This user is from outside of this forum
                    condret@fedi.absturztau.be
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9
                    @nohhue @mttaggart and robots.txt is legally binding?
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                    Svar
                    • Svar som emne
                    Login for at svare
                    • Ældste til nyeste
                    • Nyeste til ældste
                    • Most Votes


                    • Log ind

                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                    • Login or register to search.
                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Hjem
                    • Seneste
                    • Etiketter
                    • Populære
                    • Verden
                    • Bruger
                    • Grupper