Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
28 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

    🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

    Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

    From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
    🔹 Deepfakes
    🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
    🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

    You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

    👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

    illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    illuminatus@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #21

    @EUCommission Weak, bland, useless.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • thesdev@social.vivaldi.netT thesdev@social.vivaldi.net

      @EUCommission one of these labels is not like the others.

      canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      canleaf@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #22

      @thesdev @EUCommission Because Leyen isso incompetent

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

        🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

        Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

        From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
        🔹 Deepfakes
        🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
        🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

        You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

        👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

        dat@social.g33ky.deD This user is from outside of this forum
        dat@social.g33ky.deD This user is from outside of this forum
        dat@social.g33ky.de
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #23

        the CE label really isn’t the good example you think it is

        also energy labels? I’m all for those energy classes and normed labels… but then there was that A+++±Fuckup?

        …and that was solved by making the previous A into a C and the previous A++ into A? And the label looked the same? Because making it distinct would be too obvious?

        All I’m saying is: your idea might be okay, but the examples are stupid

        zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

          🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

          Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

          From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
          🔹 Deepfakes
          🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
          🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

          You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

          👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

          mawirai@nrw.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mawirai@nrw.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mawirai@nrw.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #24

          @EUCommission And today, as heard in the actual AI-Podcast "KI-Update" from @heiseonline big companys like #ikea, #H&M, #zalando, #inditex wrote a letter to act against this and want to have an exeption. Because, AI-Models for clothing photos or fakes for living rooms are much cheaper than paying a model for a photoshooting or an interieur designer to put the newest Smörebrod-Furniture in a room. And, will they get that exeption? Of course they will. 🤨

          mawirai@nrw.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dat@social.g33ky.deD dat@social.g33ky.de

            the CE label really isn’t the good example you think it is

            also energy labels? I’m all for those energy classes and normed labels… but then there was that A+++±Fuckup?

            …and that was solved by making the previous A into a C and the previous A++ into A? And the label looked the same? Because making it distinct would be too obvious?

            All I’m saying is: your idea might be okay, but the examples are stupid

            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #25
            @dat @EUCommission It is all scam!!! there are no other models!
            Same for housing, just pay the expert a sum and he gives it an A to your building's isolation is how things work but EU commision wants to enforce that even and add even more.
            I swear each day this account posts it makes me regret to be born in EU frankly if I was rich I would leave now immediatly
            Post this on W and leave us alone, frankly daily I read some idiotic add of you> imma block you and ya server.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mawirai@nrw.socialM mawirai@nrw.social

              @EUCommission And today, as heard in the actual AI-Podcast "KI-Update" from @heiseonline big companys like #ikea, #H&M, #zalando, #inditex wrote a letter to act against this and want to have an exeption. Because, AI-Models for clothing photos or fakes for living rooms are much cheaper than paying a model for a photoshooting or an interieur designer to put the newest Smörebrod-Furniture in a room. And, will they get that exeption? Of course they will. 🤨

              mawirai@nrw.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mawirai@nrw.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mawirai@nrw.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #26

              @EUCommission @heiseonline Think of that, every photo on the #ikea website will have that label... They neeeeeever wanna do that...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

                Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

                From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
                🔹 Deepfakes
                🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
                🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

                You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

                👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

                senda@neopaquita.esS This user is from outside of this forum
                senda@neopaquita.esS This user is from outside of this forum
                senda@neopaquita.es
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #27

                @EUCommission how are you going to enforce it?
                I don't want people labelling their deepfakes, I want people to stop creating them. Anyone trying to blackmail or hurt someone else's reputation will not be stoped by a stupid label.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                  🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

                  Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

                  From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
                  🔹 Deepfakes
                  🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
                  🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

                  You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

                  👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

                  carola@neopaquita.esC This user is from outside of this forum
                  carola@neopaquita.esC This user is from outside of this forum
                  carola@neopaquita.es
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #28

                  @EUCommission I don’t want huge data centers and crazy water consumption and a label ain’t fixing that

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • koefoed@helvede.netK koefoed@helvede.net shared this topic
                  Svar
                  • Svar som emne
                  Login for at svare
                  • Ældste til nyeste
                  • Nyeste til ældste
                  • Most Votes


                  • Log ind

                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Hjem
                  • Seneste
                  • Etiketter
                  • Populære
                  • Verden
                  • Bruger
                  • Grupper