Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

"AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
129 Indlæg 39 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

    @cR0w Hi, yes. This is me. I am dev, sec, ops, management that has been destroyed making everyone more vulnerable.

    Mostly dev, sec & ops... but there was some mild management in there (against my better judgement).

    This is exactly the truth. AI is a tool. But it's a tool that has been given some kind of mystical authority over long term thinking.

    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cr0w@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @jackryder It's not even a tool though. It's more of a component. Like asbestos in brake pads. Or lead in paint. They made people feel like they were improving the product while in reality they were killing the customers and the environment.

    jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ rootwyrm@weird.autosR mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

      @jackryder It's not even a tool though. It's more of a component. Like asbestos in brake pads. Or lead in paint. They made people feel like they were improving the product while in reality they were killing the customers and the environment.

      jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackryder@infosec.exchange
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @cR0w Yeah, that's a much better description.

      Lead in the paint, asbestos in brake pads...is such a good description. That's exactly right.

      So many people thought that stuff was so innocent.

      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC sagefault@infosec.exchangeS 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

        "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

        "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

        lycanoid@ieji.deL This user is from outside of this forum
        lycanoid@ieji.deL This user is from outside of this forum
        lycanoid@ieji.de
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5

        @cR0w Yeah but it will protect the children…

        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

          @cR0w Yeah, that's a much better description.

          Lead in the paint, asbestos in brake pads...is such a good description. That's exactly right.

          So many people thought that stuff was so innocent.

          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cr0w@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @jackryder Or PFAS in flame retardant, cooking pans, rain gear, etc. Or methanol in moonshine.

          jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

            @jackryder It's not even a tool though. It's more of a component. Like asbestos in brake pads. Or lead in paint. They made people feel like they were improving the product while in reality they were killing the customers and the environment.

            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autos
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7

            @cR0w @jackryder I would go a lot further than that. LLMs are a "tool" in the same sense as chainsawing off your own leg is a "tool."
            Except chainsawing off your leg does a shitload less damage.

            This isn't lead in the paint where it's safe till the paint starts failing. This is Bhopal including the UCAR response.

            jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

              "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

              "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

              neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @cR0w permission to pop this up on LinkedIn?

              😄

              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lycanoid@ieji.deL lycanoid@ieji.de

                @cR0w Yeah but it will protect the children…

                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                cr0w@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                @lycanoid I wish I could tell if you were being genuine or sarcastic, but this is the Internet so... help me out please. 😆

                lycanoid@ieji.deL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                  @cR0w permission to pop this up on LinkedIn?

                  😄

                  cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cr0w@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  @neurovagrant Hell yeah. Rile some bros up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                    @cR0w @jackryder I would go a lot further than that. LLMs are a "tool" in the same sense as chainsawing off your own leg is a "tool."
                    Except chainsawing off your leg does a shitload less damage.

                    This isn't lead in the paint where it's safe till the paint starts failing. This is Bhopal including the UCAR response.

                    jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackryder@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    @rootwyrm @cR0w I mean, I've had people think less of me for my stance on LLMs. I've never held a very strong opinion of them and the more they proliferated the worse they seem to be.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                      @jackryder Or PFAS in flame retardant, cooking pans, rain gear, etc. Or methanol in moonshine.

                      jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jackryder@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      @cR0w I got this great idea, right?
                      So you know the game darts? You throw a sharp pointy metal spike at a wall... right?

                      What if... get this... instead of a tiny little bitch spike, we go full 9inches? Have kids throw them just straight in the air... see what happens.

                      What'cha think?

                      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC jimijamflimflam@mstdn.socialJ S thegreatllama@kolektiva.socialT 4 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

                        @cR0w I got this great idea, right?
                        So you know the game darts? You throw a sharp pointy metal spike at a wall... right?

                        What if... get this... instead of a tiny little bitch spike, we go full 9inches? Have kids throw them just straight in the air... see what happens.

                        What'cha think?

                        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cr0w@infosec.exchange
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        @jackryder Sounds like good, wholesome fun to me. I'm in. But only if there's lots of booze and / or weed to make it more interesting.

                        jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                          @jackryder Sounds like good, wholesome fun to me. I'm in. But only if there's lots of booze and / or weed to make it more interesting.

                          jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackryder@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #14

                          @cR0w Well hell yeah! What else are we gonna do at the lake? Too rowdy with the bonfire and beer keg to really fish anyway!

                          bruce@darkmoon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

                            @cR0w Yeah, that's a much better description.

                            Lead in the paint, asbestos in brake pads...is such a good description. That's exactly right.

                            So many people thought that stuff was so innocent.

                            sagefault@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sagefault@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sagefault@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #15

                            @jackryder @cR0w the worst part there is that you're being unfair to lead and asbestos. Those work. They put lead in paint because it is a fantastic white pigment. Asbestos is virtually fire proof.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                              @jackryder It's not even a tool though. It's more of a component. Like asbestos in brake pads. Or lead in paint. They made people feel like they were improving the product while in reality they were killing the customers and the environment.

                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #16

                              @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC rootwyrm@weird.autosR troed@swecyb.comT darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cr0w@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #17

                                @Mustardfacial @jackryder That's completely fair.

                                At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                                jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                  @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                  rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #18

                                  @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder exactly this. And they also were not DIRECTLY harmful. Asbestos wrapped around pipes is totally safe, UNTIL you disturb it or it starts breaking up into fibers. Lead paint is safe as long as it isn't crumbling because the lead content is fully contained.

                                  Slop is immediately harmful for no benefit. There is no safe state. It only APPEARS to increase mediocre output when in fact it only increases DEFECTIVE output.

                                  mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                                    "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

                                    "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

                                    adamdavis@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    adamdavis@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    adamdavis@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #19

                                    @cR0w
                                    It briefly amazed me, now it just dismays me. I work for the government. Almost all our management and about half the devs are all-in for AI. I'm older and more sceptical. I've seen a few silver bullets fly by in the past, and I don't have much desire to rearrange my job to prompting, reviewing, and hoping the AI code turns out okay. I should be able to hold out until retirement, but younger folks don't have that luxury.

                                    darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                                      "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

                                      "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

                                      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      timwardcam@c.im
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #20

                                      @cR0w Until recently I worked somewhere that was pressuring developers into using the AI tools it was paying for.

                                      One feature of working for that company was its "security" - pretty well anything you tried to do ran into some roadblock or other because "security".

                                      So I asked the AI: "How do I get round this 'security' feature?"

                                      And instead of reporting me to security it actually gave me an answer. Which, in the nature of code generated by AI, didn't actually work, but it gave me a clue as to how to come up with something that did.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                                        @Mustardfacial @jackryder That's completely fair.

                                        At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                        But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                                        jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jackryder@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #21

                                        @cR0w @Mustardfacial Yup
                                        and it gives them the justification they need.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                          @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder exactly this. And they also were not DIRECTLY harmful. Asbestos wrapped around pipes is totally safe, UNTIL you disturb it or it starts breaking up into fibers. Lead paint is safe as long as it isn't crumbling because the lead content is fully contained.

                                          Slop is immediately harmful for no benefit. There is no safe state. It only APPEARS to increase mediocre output when in fact it only increases DEFECTIVE output.

                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #22

                                          @rootwyrm @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos was directly harmful to the people producing the sheets that you wrapped around pipes, lead in the paint was directly harmful to the people producing the paint. It was awful to the factory workers themselves more than to the average consumer.

                                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper