Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

"AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
129 Indlæg 39 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

    "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

    "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #8

    @cR0w permission to pop this up on LinkedIn?

    😄

    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lycanoid@ieji.deL lycanoid@ieji.de

      @cR0w Yeah but it will protect the children…

      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cr0w@infosec.exchange
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #9

      @lycanoid I wish I could tell if you were being genuine or sarcastic, but this is the Internet so... help me out please. 😆

      lycanoid@ieji.deL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

        @cR0w permission to pop this up on LinkedIn?

        😄

        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cr0w@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #10

        @neurovagrant Hell yeah. Rile some bros up.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

          @cR0w @jackryder I would go a lot further than that. LLMs are a "tool" in the same sense as chainsawing off your own leg is a "tool."
          Except chainsawing off your leg does a shitload less damage.

          This isn't lead in the paint where it's safe till the paint starts failing. This is Bhopal including the UCAR response.

          jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jackryder@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #11

          @rootwyrm @cR0w I mean, I've had people think less of me for my stance on LLMs. I've never held a very strong opinion of them and the more they proliferated the worse they seem to be.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

            @jackryder Or PFAS in flame retardant, cooking pans, rain gear, etc. Or methanol in moonshine.

            jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jackryder@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #12

            @cR0w I got this great idea, right?
            So you know the game darts? You throw a sharp pointy metal spike at a wall... right?

            What if... get this... instead of a tiny little bitch spike, we go full 9inches? Have kids throw them just straight in the air... see what happens.

            What'cha think?

            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC jimijamflimflam@mstdn.socialJ S thegreatllama@kolektiva.socialT 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

              @cR0w I got this great idea, right?
              So you know the game darts? You throw a sharp pointy metal spike at a wall... right?

              What if... get this... instead of a tiny little bitch spike, we go full 9inches? Have kids throw them just straight in the air... see what happens.

              What'cha think?

              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
              cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
              cr0w@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #13

              @jackryder Sounds like good, wholesome fun to me. I'm in. But only if there's lots of booze and / or weed to make it more interesting.

              jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                @jackryder Sounds like good, wholesome fun to me. I'm in. But only if there's lots of booze and / or weed to make it more interesting.

                jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jackryder@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #14

                @cR0w Well hell yeah! What else are we gonna do at the lake? Too rowdy with the bonfire and beer keg to really fish anyway!

                bruce@darkmoon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ jackryder@infosec.exchange

                  @cR0w Yeah, that's a much better description.

                  Lead in the paint, asbestos in brake pads...is such a good description. That's exactly right.

                  So many people thought that stuff was so innocent.

                  sagefault@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sagefault@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sagefault@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #15

                  @jackryder @cR0w the worst part there is that you're being unfair to lead and asbestos. Those work. They put lead in paint because it is a fantastic white pigment. Asbestos is virtually fire proof.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                    @jackryder It's not even a tool though. It's more of a component. Like asbestos in brake pads. Or lead in paint. They made people feel like they were improving the product while in reality they were killing the customers and the environment.

                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #16

                    @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC rootwyrm@weird.autosR troed@swecyb.comT darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD 4 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                      @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cr0w@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #17

                      @Mustardfacial @jackryder That's completely fair.

                      At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                      But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                      jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                        @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rootwyrm@weird.autos
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #18

                        @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder exactly this. And they also were not DIRECTLY harmful. Asbestos wrapped around pipes is totally safe, UNTIL you disturb it or it starts breaking up into fibers. Lead paint is safe as long as it isn't crumbling because the lead content is fully contained.

                        Slop is immediately harmful for no benefit. There is no safe state. It only APPEARS to increase mediocre output when in fact it only increases DEFECTIVE output.

                        mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                          "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

                          "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

                          adamdavis@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adamdavis@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adamdavis@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #19

                          @cR0w
                          It briefly amazed me, now it just dismays me. I work for the government. Almost all our management and about half the devs are all-in for AI. I'm older and more sceptical. I've seen a few silver bullets fly by in the past, and I don't have much desire to rearrange my job to prompting, reviewing, and hoping the AI code turns out okay. I should be able to hold out until retirement, but younger folks don't have that luxury.

                          darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                            "AI is giving attackers a huge advantage!"

                            "Yes, it is. It's amazing how quickly it has destroyed dev, sec, ops, management, company missions and priorities, regulations, information literacy, and civil society, making everyone more vulnerable."

                            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                            timwardcam@c.im
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #20

                            @cR0w Until recently I worked somewhere that was pressuring developers into using the AI tools it was paying for.

                            One feature of working for that company was its "security" - pretty well anything you tried to do ran into some roadblock or other because "security".

                            So I asked the AI: "How do I get round this 'security' feature?"

                            And instead of reporting me to security it actually gave me an answer. Which, in the nature of code generated by AI, didn't actually work, but it gave me a clue as to how to come up with something that did.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                              @Mustardfacial @jackryder That's completely fair.

                              At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                              But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                              jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jackryder@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jackryder@infosec.exchange
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #21

                              @cR0w @Mustardfacial Yup
                              and it gives them the justification they need.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder exactly this. And they also were not DIRECTLY harmful. Asbestos wrapped around pipes is totally safe, UNTIL you disturb it or it starts breaking up into fibers. Lead paint is safe as long as it isn't crumbling because the lead content is fully contained.

                                Slop is immediately harmful for no benefit. There is no safe state. It only APPEARS to increase mediocre output when in fact it only increases DEFECTIVE output.

                                mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #22

                                @rootwyrm @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos was directly harmful to the people producing the sheets that you wrapped around pipes, lead in the paint was directly harmful to the people producing the paint. It was awful to the factory workers themselves more than to the average consumer.

                                rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                                  @Mustardfacial @jackryder That's completely fair.

                                  At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                  But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                                  mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #23

                                  @cR0w @jackryder
                                  But that is the "benefit" as seen by so so many people.

                                  This is unfortunately the truth.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                    @rootwyrm @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos was directly harmful to the people producing the sheets that you wrapped around pipes, lead in the paint was directly harmful to the people producing the paint. It was awful to the factory workers themselves more than to the average consumer.

                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #24

                                    @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder funny thing about that...

                                    https://www.404media.co/ai-is-african-intelligence-the-workers-who-train-ai-are-fighting-back/

                                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                      @Mustardfacial @cR0w @jackryder funny thing about that...

                                      https://www.404media.co/ai-is-african-intelligence-the-workers-who-train-ai-are-fighting-back/

                                      mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #25

                                      @rootwyrm @cR0w @jackryder God dammit. This is the worst fucking timeline.

                                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR S 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                        @cR0w @jackryder Asbestos in brake pads and lead in paint did improve the product though. If they weren't so horriffic to human health, we would still be using them. Conversely, I've yet to see an instance where AI has actually improved anything. At best it lets people who are mediocre at their jobs output a higher quantity of mediocre work.

                                        troed@swecyb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        troed@swecyb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        troed@swecyb.com
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #26

                                        @Mustardfacial

                                        I'm extremely good at what I do - belonging to that mythical home computer generation that started programming in ASM and never stopped learning how _everything_ works. To no one's surprise I'm thus working in cybersec today, partly as an ethical hacker focusing on hw/fw exploits at the really tricky low level stuff.

                                        A few days ago I tested, for fun, having Mistral AI's Devstral-2 model do an analysis of a firmware dump of an eMMC I had just extracted from a fully proprietary ARM-based IoT device.

                                        In a minute or so it had made the same conclusions as I would myself, nicely documented, on not just standard partitions and what they contained but also the fully custom stuff with no standard markers at all - including making "educated guesses" at the likely boundaries between headers and data, and what the data could be based on number of bits/bytes and entropy.

                                        The question is whether you will now consider me to be mediocre.

                                        @cR0w @jackryder

                                        mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • troed@swecyb.comT troed@swecyb.com

                                          @Mustardfacial

                                          I'm extremely good at what I do - belonging to that mythical home computer generation that started programming in ASM and never stopped learning how _everything_ works. To no one's surprise I'm thus working in cybersec today, partly as an ethical hacker focusing on hw/fw exploits at the really tricky low level stuff.

                                          A few days ago I tested, for fun, having Mistral AI's Devstral-2 model do an analysis of a firmware dump of an eMMC I had just extracted from a fully proprietary ARM-based IoT device.

                                          In a minute or so it had made the same conclusions as I would myself, nicely documented, on not just standard partitions and what they contained but also the fully custom stuff with no standard markers at all - including making "educated guesses" at the likely boundaries between headers and data, and what the data could be based on number of bits/bytes and entropy.

                                          The question is whether you will now consider me to be mediocre.

                                          @cR0w @jackryder

                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #27

                                          @troed @cR0w @jackryder No, you're looking for a fight.
                                          What's that thing Socrates said? "I may be the smartest man alive because I know I don't know anything at all"

                                          Be humble bro.

                                          troed@swecyb.comT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper