FCC reply comments are due by 5pm EDT Monday 30 March on Reflect Orbital.
-
@sundogplanets
IMO, Reflect Orbital is a total scam. Their business model has been debunked in a video. The video didn't even touch on the number of days there will be clouds that will fully prevent any solar panels getting extra light. I think that they are only doing this to steal venture capitalists' money.@MichaelMcWilliams I totally agree with you! But it's a scam that is going to cause real people and real ecosystems (and astronomy!) measurable harm so I am fighting it as hard as I can.
-
@MichaelMcWilliams I totally agree with you! But it's a scam that is going to cause real people and real ecosystems (and astronomy!) measurable harm so I am fighting it as hard as I can.
@sundogplanets
Here's the debunk video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkjyeI0ykGM -
@sundogplanets
Here's the debunk video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkjyeI0ykGM@MichaelMcWilliams I LOVE this video!
-
Following up to say... the whole idea is so fucking ignorant that it's all shocking. I'm just focusing on the eye damage issue because it's something they readily admit will cause harm, and it's a concrete calculation (even if I think they did it in a bullshit way that ignores a lot of things that actually make it MORE likely to cause eye damage)
Ecological damage has me far more worried, and losing so much of the night sky for some techbro fuckweasel's pipe dream is just devastating.
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
-
Any journalists want to write about this? Or anyone know how to figure out who insures Reflect Orbital? Reflect Orbital will cause eye damage to people using telescopes, as astronomers have previously calculated, and they openly admitted it in their reply.
(There is a whole slew of absolutely devastating ecological damage they will also cause, but I'm focusing on this one for now because it's so shocking)
I'm not a lawyer, but I would think that admitting your fuckweasel's pipe dream will cause eye damage, and then building it anyway, should make you liable for all the eye damage you cause.
Small comfort for those who lose their eyesight, I know.
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
For some reason this whole situation reminds me of the ELF (Earth Liberation Front) and the time they burned down that ski resort in Vail. Sunshine Overaker is still on the FBI's wanted list, almost 30 years later.
Burning down a ski resort is one thing. I can see something like the destruction of our night skies inspiring an entirely new breed of activist, the kind that wouldn't shy away from taking down the very satellites trying to steal the stars from us.
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
@sundogplanets it is important, and, as a senior I can add "quite satisfying", to later be able to say "I told you so" and get grant money to clean up the mess.
As Bucky said, people always do the right thing, but ONLY after they have exhausted every stupid alternative. This is, I think, called, in biology, "the genetic algorithm"
️ -
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
Thank you for doing this.
-
For some reason this whole situation reminds me of the ELF (Earth Liberation Front) and the time they burned down that ski resort in Vail. Sunshine Overaker is still on the FBI's wanted list, almost 30 years later.
Burning down a ski resort is one thing. I can see something like the destruction of our night skies inspiring an entirely new breed of activist, the kind that wouldn't shy away from taking down the very satellites trying to steal the stars from us.
@Legit_Spaghetti @sundogplanets
Unfortunately, slingshots won't shoot that far.
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
As a complete lay person, with no formal expertise in this matter whatsoever, is it appropriate to write a comment that just says "This is a fantastically stupid fucking idea. What the hell are you thinking? No no no no!"
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
@sundogplanets CLAPPING!! It wil have an impact.
Also cc'ing @Paulatics as she is on the case in #Canada
-
@Legit_Spaghetti @sundogplanets
Unfortunately, slingshots won't shoot that far.
@Mikal @sundogplanets I don't think you'd need anything as dramatic as an anti-satellite weapon (not that anyone could even build such a thing without government funding and without setting off all kinds of alarm bells among the different alphabet soup agencies). Compromising a satellite's software would be a much cheaper and slightly more achievable way to do it.
-
@Mikal @sundogplanets I don't think you'd need anything as dramatic as an anti-satellite weapon (not that anyone could even build such a thing without government funding and without setting off all kinds of alarm bells among the different alphabet soup agencies). Compromising a satellite's software would be a much cheaper and slightly more achievable way to do it.
@Legit_Spaghetti @sundogplanets
Where are the antifa super hackers when you need them? Or maybe night sky liberation front?
But, yeah, wouldn't that be hilarious. Hack them so they turn the wrong way and use whatever thrust capability they have to launch themselves out of orbit on a slow path out into deep space. Byyeeee
-
@Legit_Spaghetti @sundogplanets
Where are the antifa super hackers when you need them? Or maybe night sky liberation front?
But, yeah, wouldn't that be hilarious. Hack them so they turn the wrong way and use whatever thrust capability they have to launch themselves out of orbit on a slow path out into deep space. Byyeeee
@Mikal @sundogplanets That would be funny, but I don't think they have enough propellant to get there. Deorbiting should be possible though.
Of course, that kind of unplanned maneuver would increase the risk of an ablation cascade, but that's where we're headed anyway with these turbostupid gigaconstellations.
-
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
@sundogplanets standing ovation
-
@sundogplanets it is important, and, as a senior I can add "quite satisfying", to later be able to say "I told you so" and get grant money to clean up the mess.
As Bucky said, people always do the right thing, but ONLY after they have exhausted every stupid alternative. This is, I think, called, in biology, "the genetic algorithm"
️Grattis application starting something like
"Now that the Kessler syndrome is at most a decade away it is time to start working on a clean-up system. In this [...]" -
I managed to proofread and comment on the entire 6 page American Astronomical Society draft response to Reflect Orbital's reply and also write my own draft response and not throw my laptop out the window with rage over Reflect Orbital's absolutely fucking terrible plans. Please clap.
Do I think this will actually help? No, not really, the FCC is evil and blinded by $$$. Do I still have to do this? Yes. Yes I do.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
