Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders.

When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
55 Indlæg 29 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • triptilt@mastoart.socialT triptilt@mastoart.social

    @tante
    guess that is how youtube thinks about me using an adblocker as well?
    can't wait for the blogpost about how it's not that 🙂

    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    @TripTilt I do think that there is a difference between corporations and individuals. My website is just my personal work that I host as a person.

    hex@kolektiva.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • triptilt@mastoart.socialT triptilt@mastoart.social

      @tante
      guess that is how youtube thinks about me using an adblocker as well?
      can't wait for the blogpost about how it's not that 🙂

      crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @TripTilt @tante

      It all goes back to why a website operator gets to dictate what software (a user agent, plugins, etc) runs or doesn't on MY machine.

      For me, I run defeat tools. Anti-DRM and DRM strippers. I have a cloudflare defeat container. I have a Anubis defeat container. Paywall defeat container. And I also run bypass-paywalls-complete over from gitflic.ru (Russian github). I run these tools because this is what makes the web usable. And its terrible I have to, but also a necessity.

      I also use https://hister.org/ personally. Has all my history and webpages and everything. Saves and scrapes as I browse. Also has LLM features and API so I can also send my agents when Im watching stuff.

      "Abuse" is a common one, of which I soundly reject. My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx.

      triptilt@mastoart.socialT trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT longspeak@bardicperspiration.clubL szakib@freeradical.zoneS 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange

        @TripTilt @tante

        It all goes back to why a website operator gets to dictate what software (a user agent, plugins, etc) runs or doesn't on MY machine.

        For me, I run defeat tools. Anti-DRM and DRM strippers. I have a cloudflare defeat container. I have a Anubis defeat container. Paywall defeat container. And I also run bypass-paywalls-complete over from gitflic.ru (Russian github). I run these tools because this is what makes the web usable. And its terrible I have to, but also a necessity.

        I also use https://hister.org/ personally. Has all my history and webpages and everything. Saves and scrapes as I browse. Also has LLM features and API so I can also send my agents when Im watching stuff.

        "Abuse" is a common one, of which I soundly reject. My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx.

        triptilt@mastoart.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        triptilt@mastoart.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        triptilt@mastoart.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        @crankylinuxuser @tante

        of course you are right, how see it, blocking agents and the like is like the bouncer on a website that does not want you to enter or see something, while blocking ads is avoiding not a bouncer but the loud clowns making people interested in the circus and leading them in through the shop and thus showing them something they didn't want to see 🙂

        crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.

          It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.

          hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hexaheximal@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          @tante out of curiosity, what notable examples of this are there (aside from the thing when a bluesky user submitted an llm-generated patch to open-slopware)

          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange

            @TripTilt @tante

            It all goes back to why a website operator gets to dictate what software (a user agent, plugins, etc) runs or doesn't on MY machine.

            For me, I run defeat tools. Anti-DRM and DRM strippers. I have a cloudflare defeat container. I have a Anubis defeat container. Paywall defeat container. And I also run bypass-paywalls-complete over from gitflic.ru (Russian github). I run these tools because this is what makes the web usable. And its terrible I have to, but also a necessity.

            I also use https://hister.org/ personally. Has all my history and webpages and everything. Saves and scrapes as I browse. Also has LLM features and API so I can also send my agents when Im watching stuff.

            "Abuse" is a common one, of which I soundly reject. My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx.

            trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            trashpanda@m.alittlenook.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            @crankylinuxuser @TripTilt @tante "My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx."

            They did. It is named Anubis and you're really making their point. If someone puts a lock some something and says don't touch, you can't tell them, "Well if you don't want people to touch it, then don't put it outside!"

            Your computer yes, but interacting with THEIR computer. And they don't consent.

            crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.

              It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.

              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              @tante we knew that as soon as they ignored robots.txt

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH hexaheximal@mstdn.social

                @tante out of curiosity, what notable examples of this are there (aside from the thing when a bluesky user submitted an llm-generated patch to open-slopware)

                tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tante@tldr.nettime.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                @hexaheximal @davidgerard just linked a tool some Kernel dev generated to beat "Anubis", which is one of those kinds of tools

                utf_7@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.

                  It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.

                  sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blog
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @tante Techbros all have a problem with consent.

                  utf_7@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blog

                    @tante Techbros all have a problem with consent.

                    utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    utf_7@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    @sharpcheddargoblin @tante

                    so potus

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      @hexaheximal @davidgerard just linked a tool some Kernel dev generated to beat "Anubis", which is one of those kinds of tools

                      utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      utf_7@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @tante @hexaheximal @davidgerard

                      what? how is anubis beatable? dont they have to use at least a headless browser? so it is heavy for scrapers because of the challenge?

                      hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • utf_7@mastodon.socialU utf_7@mastodon.social

                        @tante @hexaheximal @davidgerard

                        what? how is anubis beatable? dont they have to use at least a headless browser? so it is heavy for scrapers because of the challenge?

                        hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hexaheximal@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        @utf_7 @tante @davidgerard from a technical perspective, it is actually trivially easy to defeat anubis. it works by calculating a hash proof-of-work, which a standalone program can do too. and, of course, once the challenge is completed it stores a challenge proof as a cookie. the result is an anti-bot system that is really just a javascript checker with fancy marketing

                        utf_7@mastodon.socialU rakoo@blah.rako.spaceR 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH hexaheximal@mstdn.social

                          @utf_7 @tante @davidgerard from a technical perspective, it is actually trivially easy to defeat anubis. it works by calculating a hash proof-of-work, which a standalone program can do too. and, of course, once the challenge is completed it stores a challenge proof as a cookie. the result is an anti-bot system that is really just a javascript checker with fancy marketing

                          utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          utf_7@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          @hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard

                          uff, hard to beat that shit then. besides invisible links that scrapers may follow, i dont think recaptcha is ai proof

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT trashpanda@m.alittlenook.net

                            @crankylinuxuser @TripTilt @tante "My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx."

                            They did. It is named Anubis and you're really making their point. If someone puts a lock some something and says don't touch, you can't tell them, "Well if you don't want people to touch it, then don't put it outside!"

                            Your computer yes, but interacting with THEIR computer. And they don't consent.

                            crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante

                            When the data hits my machine/network, I'll do with it as I choose.

                            I have tools to bypass Anubis as well. Again, even Anubis considers even a secured Firefox 'abusive'. So does cloudflare and google. Turns out to not be considered abusive, you have to be willing to get abused. Imagine that.

                            And what more of an abuser is there when that entity demands their software or configuration on YOUR MACHINE. That's hella abusive. And par for the course for scum like DRM peddlers, and evidently Anubis users.

                            N lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL clayote@peoplemaking.gamesC 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • utf_7@mastodon.socialU utf_7@mastodon.social

                              @hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard

                              uff, hard to beat that shit then. besides invisible links that scrapers may follow, i dont think recaptcha is ai proof

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @utf_7 @hexaheximal @tante yeah, it "beats" something that anubis doesn't claim to do. it's a bad post.

                              hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                @utf_7 @hexaheximal @tante yeah, it "beats" something that anubis doesn't claim to do. it's a bad post.

                                hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hexaheximal@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #21

                                @davidgerard @utf_7 @tante while anubis does block (most) scrapers, that's really only because at least most of them don't implement javascript at all, let alone the required features to run the proof-of-work code.

                                iirc also some scrapers have been modified to now bypass the proof-of-work challenge page by just computing the proof-of-work itself

                                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • triptilt@mastoart.socialT triptilt@mastoart.social

                                  @crankylinuxuser @tante

                                  of course you are right, how see it, blocking agents and the like is like the bouncer on a website that does not want you to enter or see something, while blocking ads is avoiding not a bouncer but the loud clowns making people interested in the circus and leading them in through the shop and thus showing them something they didn't want to see 🙂

                                  crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #22

                                  @TripTilt @tante

                                  Tante has already made a distinction between companies and individuals. I'm OK with that.

                                  But I, an individual, use multiple user agents for my personal reasons. My tools do scrape/save. BTW thats legal. And my tools display and scrape both, to lessen server impact. (Hister).

                                  All this is ranting is about AI and LLMs. And Its all just a loud proclamation that they are "Right". (Insert old man yelling at cloud meme)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                    When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.

                                    It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.

                                    ams@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ams@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ams@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #23

                                    @tante Is your "anti-AI software" some half-asssed coinminer? Because if so you are an abuser and should think carefully before throwing stones.

                                    szakib@freeradical.zoneS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange

                                      @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante

                                      When the data hits my machine/network, I'll do with it as I choose.

                                      I have tools to bypass Anubis as well. Again, even Anubis considers even a secured Firefox 'abusive'. So does cloudflare and google. Turns out to not be considered abusive, you have to be willing to get abused. Imagine that.

                                      And what more of an abuser is there when that entity demands their software or configuration on YOUR MACHINE. That's hella abusive. And par for the course for scum like DRM peddlers, and evidently Anubis users.

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      newhereish@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #24

                                      @crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante Pretty much this. Part of being in society is accepting that there are boundaries to personal preferences and interacting with other people is accepting that something one considers to be in their personal bubble can be something that others feel is in their personal bubble and there is inevitably going to be disagreement about where those are.

                                      crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • hexaheximal@mstdn.socialH hexaheximal@mstdn.social

                                        @davidgerard @utf_7 @tante while anubis does block (most) scrapers, that's really only because at least most of them don't implement javascript at all, let alone the required features to run the proof-of-work code.

                                        iirc also some scrapers have been modified to now bypass the proof-of-work challenge page by just computing the proof-of-work itself

                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #25

                                        @hexaheximal @utf_7 @tante anubis slows a flood of scrapers, not 100% of individual AI bozos.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchangeC crankylinuxuser@infosec.exchange

                                          @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante

                                          When the data hits my machine/network, I'll do with it as I choose.

                                          I have tools to bypass Anubis as well. Again, even Anubis considers even a secured Firefox 'abusive'. So does cloudflare and google. Turns out to not be considered abusive, you have to be willing to get abused. Imagine that.

                                          And what more of an abuser is there when that entity demands their software or configuration on YOUR MACHINE. That's hella abusive. And par for the course for scum like DRM peddlers, and evidently Anubis users.

                                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #26

                                          @crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante As soon as a see an "enable javascript and disable any ad blocker" popup, I close the tab, every time.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper