When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders.
-
@davidgerard @utf_7 @tante while anubis does block (most) scrapers, that's really only because at least most of them don't implement javascript at all, let alone the required features to run the proof-of-work code.
iirc also some scrapers have been modified to now bypass the proof-of-work challenge page by just computing the proof-of-work itself
@hexaheximal @utf_7 @tante anubis slows a flood of scrapers, not 100% of individual AI bozos.
-
When the data hits my machine/network, I'll do with it as I choose.
I have tools to bypass Anubis as well. Again, even Anubis considers even a secured Firefox 'abusive'. So does cloudflare and google. Turns out to not be considered abusive, you have to be willing to get abused. Imagine that.
And what more of an abuser is there when that entity demands their software or configuration on YOUR MACHINE. That's hella abusive. And par for the course for scum like DRM peddlers, and evidently Anubis users.
@crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante As soon as a see an "enable javascript and disable any ad blocker" popup, I close the tab, every time.
-
@hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard
uff, hard to beat that shit then. besides invisible links that scrapers may follow, i dont think recaptcha is ai proof
@utf_7 @hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard Recaptcha automatically blocks all of us human users who block Google for privacy reasons.
Now they want access to web cams that many desktops and laptops don't even HAVE or in the case of laptops are often broken on Linux. The privacy implications of that are staggering.
I simply treat sites that hide behind Recaptcha as having been taken down
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
@tante I wonder if that is even legal in Germany… They are circumventing a protection mechanism!
-
@crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante Pretty much this. Part of being in society is accepting that there are boundaries to personal preferences and interacting with other people is accepting that something one considers to be in their personal bubble can be something that others feel is in their personal bubble and there is inevitably going to be disagreement about where those are.
@Newhereish @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante
I'm a system engineer. I run online services as well, professionally, and personally.
I know what abuse is. Hack attempts (get /../../../../ etc). DoS. DDoS. There's a few others, but the commonality is that they attempt to exhaust a limited resource to prevent me from the thing.
Running a custom user agent and ingesting into a search engine/cache not is NOT ABUSIVE.
Just because I did something you didn't like, does not make it abusive. Hell, I've fought with idiots who disabled right-click menus on websites. Like no, you sent my agent the data. I have it already.
But again, this is just more #LLM hatred #propaganda . There's more and more of us who run local-everything. And yes, local search/cache agents, with local LLMs and more.
And yea, the LLM companies are terrible. I don't use'em. I don't have to.
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
@tante It's disappointing to see a number of people take the "it's on the web, therefore it's fair game" position
Literal hobbyless, tragedy of the commons behavior.
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
@tante Ultimately, this is why I opted for a different stance. Instead of trying to block anything, every page has license text that explicitly states that use with AI software implies they agree the my commercial license for my content, which is $30 million USD. Yes, I'm willing to cash-out. (It's a dual-license, which is normal enough.)
By feeding my content to AI software, they both agree that the pricing is fair and that they're willing to pay.
You have to click a link to hide the license as in a JavaScript-capable browser and you don't see the real text until you do. In a text-mode browser or without Javascript it simply always shows. It prints on every page, but in small print.
It's what the software industry calls a "shrinkwrap license" so it isn't anything particularly new or strange. They read the license and click a button to acknowledge they agree with the license. If they don't agree with the license, they don't click the link and go somewhere else. (It doesn't use cookies or server-side anything.)
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
@tante
In the end most pages will probably have to go the troy hunt way and have people pay at least a symbolic dollar for an account and track abuse based on that... -
It all goes back to why a website operator gets to dictate what software (a user agent, plugins, etc) runs or doesn't on MY machine.
For me, I run defeat tools. Anti-DRM and DRM strippers. I have a cloudflare defeat container. I have a Anubis defeat container. Paywall defeat container. And I also run bypass-paywalls-complete over from gitflic.ru (Russian github). I run these tools because this is what makes the web usable. And its terrible I have to, but also a necessity.
I also use https://hister.org/ personally. Has all my history and webpages and everything. Saves and scrapes as I browse. Also has LLM features and API so I can also send my agents when Im watching stuff.
"Abuse" is a common one, of which I soundly reject. My computer. My user agent. My rules on my side. If you don't want to share, then by all means, sudo systemctl disable nginx && sudo systemctl stop nginx.
@crankylinuxuser @TripTilt @tante Can a pretty low-tech, non savvy guy run these tools? Like, install and run?
-
When the data hits my machine/network, I'll do with it as I choose.
I have tools to bypass Anubis as well. Again, even Anubis considers even a secured Firefox 'abusive'. So does cloudflare and google. Turns out to not be considered abusive, you have to be willing to get abused. Imagine that.
And what more of an abuser is there when that entity demands their software or configuration on YOUR MACHINE. That's hella abusive. And par for the course for scum like DRM peddlers, and evidently Anubis users.
@crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt If you don't want to prove you're not a bot, you can always go to some other website than @tante's.
If I block you on Mastodon, there are lots of ways for you to circumvent that and read my posts anyway. Authorized-Fetch is only enough to make it so you've got to register an alt account. But if you actually do that, it means you recognized I set a boundary--"don't read my posts or interact with me"--and you violated it on purpose.
Why exactly should bypassing Anubis be acceptable, if evading a Masto block is not?
-
@crankylinuxuser @TripTilt @tante Can a pretty low-tech, non savvy guy run these tools? Like, install and run?
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
Access and consent are two different things. Ethical people understand the gap.
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
@tante Do techbros understand consent?
-
When you "break" the anti-AI software I have on my website that does not illustrate that the software doesn't work well enough: It shows that you are someone who explicitly circumvents people's stated values, preferences and borders. You are an abuser.
It's a test about how you treat other people, whether you respect their dignity. And you failed.
This is also a message for people who say "no-LLM-generated-code policies are useless because how will you detect that my code is LLM generated"
-
@crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt If you don't want to prove you're not a bot, you can always go to some other website than @tante's.
If I block you on Mastodon, there are lots of ways for you to circumvent that and read my posts anyway. Authorized-Fetch is only enough to make it so you've got to register an alt account. But if you actually do that, it means you recognized I set a boundary--"don't read my posts or interact with me"--and you violated it on purpose.
Why exactly should bypassing Anubis be acceptable, if evading a Masto block is not?
@clayote @crankylinuxuser @TripTilt @tante Want to add to this to make it even more inline with the example given: this remains true even if you run your own Mastodon instance on your own hardware that you built with your own hands in your own house on your own land.
-
@utf_7 @hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard Recaptcha automatically blocks all of us human users who block Google for privacy reasons.
Now they want access to web cams that many desktops and laptops don't even HAVE or in the case of laptops are often broken on Linux. The privacy implications of that are staggering.
I simply treat sites that hide behind Recaptcha as having been taken down
@LukefromDC @hexaheximal @tante @davidgerard
they want access to the cam? dafuq, for what reason? and what desktop computer has a webcam?
-
@utf_7 @tante @davidgerard from a technical perspective, it is actually trivially easy to defeat anubis. it works by calculating a hash proof-of-work, which a standalone program can do too. and, of course, once the challenge is completed it stores a challenge proof as a cookie. the result is an anti-bot system that is really just a javascript checker with fancy marketing
@hexaheximal @utf_7 @tante @davidgerard
from a technical perspective, it is actually trivially easy to rape. it works by touching a person on specific parts, which anyone can do. and, of course, once the victim is in shock, she won't be in any capacity to do anything. the result is an anti-rape system that is really just private boundaries with fancy marketing -
@Newhereish @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante
I'm a system engineer. I run online services as well, professionally, and personally.
I know what abuse is. Hack attempts (get /../../../../ etc). DoS. DDoS. There's a few others, but the commonality is that they attempt to exhaust a limited resource to prevent me from the thing.
Running a custom user agent and ingesting into a search engine/cache not is NOT ABUSIVE.
Just because I did something you didn't like, does not make it abusive. Hell, I've fought with idiots who disabled right-click menus on websites. Like no, you sent my agent the data. I have it already.
But again, this is just more #LLM hatred #propaganda . There's more and more of us who run local-everything. And yes, local search/cache agents, with local LLMs and more.
And yea, the LLM companies are terrible. I don't use'em. I don't have to.
@crankylinuxuser @Newhereish @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante bro fuck your bitch ass LLMs, no one asked for them, they are of no value to society, you're just polluting the precious online space traffic that is already botted
is it that fucking hard to not use a goddamn clanking sack of shit for every task ever?
"but its a local LLM" you're still a lower form of existence, don't care -
@TripTilt I do think that there is a difference between corporations and individuals. My website is just my personal work that I host as a person.
-
@crankylinuxuser @Newhereish @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante bro fuck your bitch ass LLMs, no one asked for them, they are of no value to society, you're just polluting the precious online space traffic that is already botted
is it that fucking hard to not use a goddamn clanking sack of shit for every task ever?
"but its a local LLM" you're still a lower form of existence, don't care@ko @crankylinuxuser @trashpanda @TripTilt @tante Yeah, eat a block. >>
