It is pretty wild that a news org (a “news” org) is running a piece that quotes loads of grok output but has no quotes from humans, other than a combative auto-reply to an email.
Ikke-kategoriseret
1
Indlæg
1
Posters
0
Visninger
-
It is pretty wild that a news org (a “news” org) is running a piece that quotes loads of grok output but has no quotes from humans, other than a combative auto-reply to an email.
Even the language here — “grok said” — is so wildly irresponsible. Grok didn’t “say” anything. It output a string of words that met a complicated set of likelihood criteria for the question “what would a reply sound like?”
*People* made this and allowed it to be used this way.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
