Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Fediverse
  3. Inkwell - a multi-tenant long-form writing platform for the fediverse (open source, FEP-b2b8)

Inkwell - a multi-tenant long-form writing platform for the fediverse (open source, FEP-b2b8)

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Fediverse
opensourcefediversewritingselfhostingactivitypub
42 Indlæg 8 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    strypey@piefed.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #41

    @julian@activitypub.space

    are you involved with @portafed@mastodon.social as well?

    This was in the context of suggesting that because Inkwell was developed with what appears to be a centaur(1) approach, and you think the Portafed ReadMe reads a bit like Trained MOLE scat, the two might be linked. This is drawing a rather long bow ; )

    I think you may be tilting at windmills about Portafed. The author confirmed, in response to your post, that they used a Trained MOLE to help with some surface documentation. This could also be an example of a centaur approach.

    Maybe English is not their first language? Perhaps they have a form of neurodivergence that makes them excellent at writing cryptographic hieroglyphics, but poor at writing natural language to explain their work to other humans? It pays to ask probing questions, for sure, but not to leap to conclusions.

    (1) I’m referencing @pluralistic@mamot.fr’s writing, on when automation is used to support a human (centaur), and when a human is reduced to a meat-based support system for the automation (reverse-centaur, or “human in the loop”). IMHO his best piece on this is Revenge of the Chickenized Reverse-Centaurs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Svar
    • Svar som emne
    Login for at svare
    • Ældste til nyeste
    • Nyeste til ældste
    • Most Votes


    • Log ind

    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    Graciously hosted by data.coop
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Hjem
    • Seneste
    • Etiketter
    • Populære
    • Verden
    • Bruger
    • Grupper