Microsoft exec suggests AI agents will need to buy software licenses, just like employees https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-executive-suggests-ai-agents-buy-software-licenses-seats-2026-4

[drwhozee@troet.cafe]

@cwebber @bkastl In that case: let them pay income tax as well. #ai #IncomeTax

[zed@mstdn.party]

@cwebber tbh, good. This will keep adoption lower than otherwise.

[andii@mas.to]

@aburka @cwebber
My question too.
And of course it wouldn't be IP...

[ukeleleeric@mstdn.social]

@cwebber Surely, if you consider that an AI agent is an user, then those agents should have the same liabilities and responsibility as other users? And considering them as employees means that the employer should take the same responsibility for their actions? So, sue the employers for their users' theft of copyright data, and the agents' makers for the same? Either they are tools or users, you can't have it both ways.

[ukeleleeric@mstdn.social]

@AG7GM @cwebber yeah, how many AI agents will 'hallucinate' their own licences?

[shwell@mastodon.au]

@cwebber I still haven't found a medium-large org bulk buying co-slop. Has anyone?

[slothrop@chaos.social]

@cwebber LOL they’ve finally found a way to make money from AI

[ysegrim@furry.engineer]

@AG7GM @cwebber It's not pirating! We just let our agents reimplement it clean slate after we've shown them the entire source code!

[itnomad@ruhr.social]

@cwebber All Children of God must obey the law!!
https://www.heise.de/en/news/AI-a-Child-of-God-Anthropic-meeting-with-several-church-leaders-11253800.html

[mxk@hachyderm.io]

@cwebber isn't that obvious?
If AI has the chance to lead to fewer humans having to use Microsoft products, there needs to be some compensation, right?