Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. no notes

no notes

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
64 Indlæg 40 Posters 71 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO orange_lux@eldritch.cafe

    @dibi58 @karl this is literally incompatible. Every LLM needs huge quantities of resources to run, and that won't magically change because we'd use an European one.

    saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    saxnot@chaos.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #10

    @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl for most purposes you don't need a LLM at all

    cut 95 % of all car usage
    we want public transport

    cut 95 % of all LLM usage
    (i don't know the details but I do know the LLM garbage on e. g. immoscout or visualping is useless to me ; just drop all of that)

    orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • th@social.v.stT th@social.v.st

      @karl The article has been amended to remove the quote "Editor’s note: This is an updated version of the article. The previous version wrongly quoted Jeff Bezos. The error is regretted."

      saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      saxnot@chaos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #11

      @th @karl LLM is a dead end towards AGI and I thought that was shown to be true since years?

      what a crazy take
      we need established solutions to established problems
      e. g. de-carbonize agriculture, steel, energy, etc.

      total water recollection (closed loop)
      never pollute wastewater with pfas
      those are already bare minimums i would say
      and just don't build them in the first place we already have an over-supply for this no-benefit bubble

      saxnot@chaos.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • saxnot@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.social

        @th @karl LLM is a dead end towards AGI and I thought that was shown to be true since years?

        what a crazy take
        we need established solutions to established problems
        e. g. de-carbonize agriculture, steel, energy, etc.

        total water recollection (closed loop)
        never pollute wastewater with pfas
        those are already bare minimums i would say
        and just don't build them in the first place we already have an over-supply for this no-benefit bubble

        saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        saxnot@chaos.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #12

        @th @karl i want established solutions to established problems

        Gimme a wind turbine, veggie-first food, gimme free train rides etc
        all of this has been invented a generation ago and we can switch once the [imaginary thing] has invented better

        e. g. hyperloop is garbage and was never better than e. g. railroad
        (and we knew the vacuum train idea is a dud centruries musk "invented" it (patented 1799 and shown to be a dud >50 years ago)
        and yet the hyperloop hindered the california rail expansion

        saxnot@chaos.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • saxnot@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.social

          @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl for most purposes you don't need a LLM at all

          cut 95 % of all car usage
          we want public transport

          cut 95 % of all LLM usage
          (i don't know the details but I do know the LLM garbage on e. g. immoscout or visualping is useless to me ; just drop all of that)

          orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
          orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
          orange_lux@eldritch.cafe
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #13

          @saxnot @dibi58 @karl and for what purposes should we NEED an LLM ?

          hex@kolektiva.socialH saxnot@chaos.socialS 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • saxnot@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.social

            @th @karl i want established solutions to established problems

            Gimme a wind turbine, veggie-first food, gimme free train rides etc
            all of this has been invented a generation ago and we can switch once the [imaginary thing] has invented better

            e. g. hyperloop is garbage and was never better than e. g. railroad
            (and we knew the vacuum train idea is a dud centruries musk "invented" it (patented 1799 and shown to be a dud >50 years ago)
            and yet the hyperloop hindered the california rail expansion

            saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            saxnot@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #14

            @th @karl assuming a hyperloop thing is invented tomorrow and it's better than trains
            until then we go all-in on trains

            assuming a better energy source is invented tomorrow
            great
            until then we go with wind / solar / storage / etc
            but UNTIL THEN we do that
            e. g. german politiclowns are obsessed by fusion power (the same party which starved fusion research funding now wants to start building today).

            should be obvious common sense (because it is)
            musk, cdu, etc are "ideology" to use their lingo

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

              no notes

              znexhf_svax@social.cologneZ This user is from outside of this forum
              znexhf_svax@social.cologneZ This user is from outside of this forum
              znexhf_svax@social.cologne
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #15

              @karl choose wisely

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                no notes

                jelu@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jelu@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jelu@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #16

                @karl maybe we can get the tech bros to care about the environment if we spin it that they need to save the fresh water needed for the data centers 🤔

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO orange_lux@eldritch.cafe

                  @saxnot @dibi58 @karl and for what purposes should we NEED an LLM ?

                  hex@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hex@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hex@kolektiva.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #17

                  @orange_lux @saxnot @dibi58 @karl llms are useful for NLP. Inference is actually relatively cheap, it's the training that's really expensive and resource intensive. We've probably already maxed out LLM capabilities, so most of this training is not useful. Companies keep training because they need to convince investors that infinite growth is possible. What actual gains are being made are coming from architectural changes, not from training.

                  Basically, "AI data centers" should not exist. Local models can do everything that's needed. If we need to train new models, those need to be balanced against climate goals (basically, don't fucking do it). And LLMs should be removed from basically everything they've been shoved into recently.

                  If you don't know why LLMs are useful, you shouldn't have to interact with LLMs. Even some of the places where they are useful, they can be used to construct cheaper models.

                  There are a few things, like correlation across huge data sets, that they're useful for. But even then, simple encoding can give you semantic search, where inference is not necessary or only provides minimal additional benefit.

                  Yeah, basically, 95-99% reduction in cars and AI. It's basically the same thing.

                  sherbang@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                    no notes

                    clouderst@abc.clouderst.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clouderst@abc.clouderst.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clouderst@abc.clouderst.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #18

                    @karl i cannot comprehend how this is something to choose.

                    how stupid can you be to pick between those two

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                      no notes

                      stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stellar@mk.absturztau.be
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #19

                      @karl@infosec.exchange we lost france to the great freezing ​​ (guillotine the guy who colored this map)

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO orange_lux@eldritch.cafe

                        @saxnot @dibi58 @karl and for what purposes should we NEED an LLM ?

                        saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        saxnot@chaos.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #20

                        @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl same we use CNN, RNN, ... etc
                        LMM is just another useful helpful machine learning type.

                        in contrast: blockchain was useless from the start.
                        LLM is boring tech blown into weird proportions due to greed, capitalism, tech-oligarchy, etc.

                        saxnot@chaos.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • saxnot@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.social

                          @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl same we use CNN, RNN, ... etc
                          LMM is just another useful helpful machine learning type.

                          in contrast: blockchain was useless from the start.
                          LLM is boring tech blown into weird proportions due to greed, capitalism, tech-oligarchy, etc.

                          saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          saxnot@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          saxnot@chaos.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #21

                          @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl e. g. the sort of stuff which ranks search queries, recommends videos, "people also bought", ads, mall layouts, etc

                          site note: my degree has focus on data/ml stuff

                          orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • stellar@mk.absturztau.beS stellar@mk.absturztau.be

                            @karl@infosec.exchange we lost france to the great freezing ​​ (guillotine the guy who colored this map)

                            J This user is from outside of this forum
                            J This user is from outside of this forum
                            janriemer@floss.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #22

                            @Stellar @karl

                            Coloring makes sense, if you interpret the grey as "dead land".

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                              no notes

                              m@martinh.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                              m@martinh.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                              m@martinh.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #23

                              @karl Imagine a group of hyper-intelligent beings building an incredibly powerful computer AGI in order to find out the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything ​

                              research_ftw@sciences.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                                no notes

                                pasmac@atmasto.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pasmac@atmasto.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pasmac@atmasto.com
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #24

                                @karl jzzz Data Centers can be optimize by a lot.
                                If we are still able to contact Voyager 1/2 how the help we can’t optimize IA, datacenters, etc.

                                Buy buy buy, crap crap crap …
                                We need to get to basics and build with few and what we have.

                                It’s possible to reach climate goals and have computer power. But for that we need to have the essential and work with it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • saxnot@chaos.socialS saxnot@chaos.social

                                  @orange_lux @dibi58 @karl e. g. the sort of stuff which ranks search queries, recommends videos, "people also bought", ads, mall layouts, etc

                                  site note: my degree has focus on data/ml stuff

                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafe
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #25

                                  @saxnot @dibi58 @karl I'm not working into data, I'm "just" a normal dev, but we had ways of recommending stuff (also bought, recommendations) way before LLMs. I don't think this is an example of why we would need them.

                                  saxnot@chaos.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                                    no notes

                                    cucufaiter@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cucufaiter@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cucufaiter@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #26

                                    @karl Difícil elección. O morir de calor en pos del beneficio de los ricos o no hacerlo. Dadme por favor 9ms para pensármelo...

                                    a_goodall_spaceship@norden.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hex@kolektiva.socialH hex@kolektiva.social

                                      @orange_lux @saxnot @dibi58 @karl llms are useful for NLP. Inference is actually relatively cheap, it's the training that's really expensive and resource intensive. We've probably already maxed out LLM capabilities, so most of this training is not useful. Companies keep training because they need to convince investors that infinite growth is possible. What actual gains are being made are coming from architectural changes, not from training.

                                      Basically, "AI data centers" should not exist. Local models can do everything that's needed. If we need to train new models, those need to be balanced against climate goals (basically, don't fucking do it). And LLMs should be removed from basically everything they've been shoved into recently.

                                      If you don't know why LLMs are useful, you shouldn't have to interact with LLMs. Even some of the places where they are useful, they can be used to construct cheaper models.

                                      There are a few things, like correlation across huge data sets, that they're useful for. But even then, simple encoding can give you semantic search, where inference is not necessary or only provides minimal additional benefit.

                                      Yeah, basically, 95-99% reduction in cars and AI. It's basically the same thing.

                                      sherbang@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sherbang@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sherbang@chaos.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #27

                                      @Hex @orange_lux @saxnot @dibi58 @karl I suspect you're underestimating the compute being dedicated to running (not training) the models.

                                      I was recently observing a conversation between small startup founders who are buying €100k EGX Station AI workstations to move their developers from Cursor/Claude to local models. The same person seemed both to be questioning the value of all this LLM use by his dev team, at the same time considering buying €100k in hardware to reduce his LLM costs.

                                      karl@infosec.exchangeK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • karl@infosec.exchangeK karl@infosec.exchange

                                        no notes

                                        callan@thepit.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        callan@thepit.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        callan@thepit.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #28

                                        @karl Yikes. People will die of heat this week in France

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • m@martinh.netM m@martinh.net

                                          @karl Imagine a group of hyper-intelligent beings building an incredibly powerful computer AGI in order to find out the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything ​

                                          research_ftw@sciences.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          research_ftw@sciences.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          research_ftw@sciences.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #29

                                          @m @karl it's 42!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper