The power of ChatGPT

[clickhere@mastodon.ie]

@GossiTheDog

Schrödinger's gay.

[agturcz@circumstances.run]

@GossiTheDog 🤪

[the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca]

@GossiTheDog

Perhaps ChatGPT could preface all it's answers with - "I gathered these responses from what other people, some knowledgeable and others without a clue, have said but I have no idea if it is true or not".

[thweathuntur@ioc.exchange]

@GossiTheDog The way it said "but with an important nuance..."

[yarthebugslayer@mas.to]

@stonykark @GossiTheDog Mechanized Male Answer Syndrome??

[jafo@inuh.net]

@GossiTheDog Cannot confirm. ChatGPT Thinking-Standard.

[jbeanz@mastodon.online]

@GossiTheDog
Well, obviously.

[vikingchieftain@mstdn.social]

@farshidhakimy

Thanks Farshid! This clip was very funny. It was like an interview from the dotcom bubble era, but with an AI CEO. Wild times ahead.

@GossiTheDog

[vikingchieftain@mstdn.social]

@lbcp @GossiTheDog

Gays... Guys... the words look the same, so they must be the same.

[vikingchieftain@mstdn.social]

@simonzerafa @GossiTheDog

Nah, just live with the 20% chance that the next moon landing will bury the astronauts 20 metres underground. Trump will approve of this because it will distract people from the Epstein files for a period of time.

[pizzademon@mastodon.online]

@GossiTheDog

[bzdev@fosstodon.org]

@wotsac @alice @GossiTheDog

ChatGPT must have been trained on the 1954 version of the film Sabrina, where a French chef in a cooking school tells his class that a souffle must be "gay" (different connotation in 1954).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR7KlvISE2w

[patrick@hatoya.cafe]

@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social ​​

[maddiefuzz@masto.hackers.town]

@GossiTheDog You can refer to me as Maddie (not gay)

[cinebox@masto.hackers.town]

@GossiTheDog reminds me of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMdPj3HXMgQ

[loucyx@mastodon.social]

@jafo @GossiTheDog even then, a reliable source of information should be consistent, meaning both Kevin and you should have gotten the same result, but we all know LLMs aren't consistent (even when the same user asks the same question) so if anything, you added more evidence proving we should avoid LLMs ‍️

[foobarry@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog the right answer is probably Kenny Everett

[kofzmann@toots.nu]

@GossiTheDog imagine how much fossil fuel was used to generate that sophisticated answer. Any such energy calculation must include all resources required to build the data sets that are
required for the system to perform the operation.

[criticalbackend@tech.lgbt]

@GossiTheDog decided to experiment with AI by asking which philosopher was run over by a milk float and it did a similar thing.

If you know who it actually was, that would be much appreciated!

[benjamineskola@hachyderm.io]

@loucyx @jafo @GossiTheDog it's also not even correct, so what you've managed to get there is a different wrong answer.

If you think 'confidentaly incorrect' is an improvement over 'obvious gibberish', then yeah, I suppose this is preferable, but it doesn't get you any closer to the truth.

(personally I think 'obviously wrong' is preferable, because then at least you know to ignore it.)