Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
151 Indlæg 57 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

    @davidgerard “oh we can’t ban everyone from the internet who makes a mistake” boy I wish my mistakes resulted in a gigantic paycheck, but this wasn’t a mistake

    green spent over a year doing crafted undisclosed marketing, choosing and framing topics to forward the Effective Altruist mission to make LLMs look dangerous but powerful (a type of critihype marketing invented by the AI corporations that funnel money into effective altruism, but you didn’t need me to tell you that as both OpenAI’s Altman and Anthropic’s Amodei have spouted the same talking points as Green), and interviewing members of the Effective Altruist and TESCREAL communities

    that’s not a mistake, that’s labor. that’s why these rich fucking assholes paid him. his job was to convince you that the science on LLMs is that they’re very powerful and therefore very dangerous.

    bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB This user is from outside of this forum
    bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB This user is from outside of this forum
    bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.dev
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #37

    @zzt @davidgerard I always thought it was sketchy when people would tell him "most people, including programmers, don't like genAI" and he'd just say "well, everyone I know in tech is saying they use it constantly and love it."

    Yeah, Hank, that's called sampling and confirmation bias and *you* have talked about why it's important to worry about.

    It's also a big red flag of "who the hell are you hanging out with?"

    bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.dev

      @zzt @davidgerard I always thought it was sketchy when people would tell him "most people, including programmers, don't like genAI" and he'd just say "well, everyone I know in tech is saying they use it constantly and love it."

      Yeah, Hank, that's called sampling and confirmation bias and *you* have talked about why it's important to worry about.

      It's also a big red flag of "who the hell are you hanging out with?"

      bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB This user is from outside of this forum
      bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.devB This user is from outside of this forum
      bryce@mastodon.brycedixon.dev
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #38

      @zzt @davidgerard I've officially requested a refund for a #CrashCourse coin I bought earlier this year and would encourage others to do the same and call out recent events as specifically why.

      I wanted to support the creation of high quality publicly available education resources as the flood of low-quality resources and misinformation only becomes more common, but recent events showed me they're not worthy of my trust in that regard.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

        hey so about your favorite boy hank green. it’s such a shame that he went overboard with the LLM stuff, that was impossible to see coming, good on him for realizing he was addicted right? well wishes for the good boy!

        anyway there’s smoking gun evidence that he was paid by effective altruists to do marketing for the “AI is so dangerous but so revolutionary” flavor of critihype. this is alleged by hank green expert hank green in the washington post, as well as an EA in charge of influencer marketing. he was literally being paid by TESCREALs.

        someone in the same community ran a program where TikTokers were required to post an AI critihype video a day in a cult-like environment where they were subjected to “voluntary” waterboarding and other forms of indoctrination. I’m not kidding, this literal thing happened.

        here’s @davidgerard’s pivot to AI with the evidence linked: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/08/06/the-ai-doomsday-cult-recruits-social-media-influencers/

        gedankenstuecke@scholar.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gedankenstuecke@scholar.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gedankenstuecke@scholar.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #39

        @zzt @davidgerard i'm old enough to remember how scicomm-wanker Jonah Lehrer was found to plagiarise and invent quotes and should have been dropped by everyone - and how the people behind RadioLab failed even that low bar.

        Would be absolutely not surprised if he's back today, happily shilling for some "ai" garbage. Not sure why this reminds me of this YT dude 🤣

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

          @davidgerard I’m very serious about this by the way

          if you respect science, you must not forgive hank green. you must spread the word on what he’s done, especially if you used to be a fan. this is corruption in the raw and what he’s done must be known.

          if you respect science, you must verify the claims of science communicators independently and reject any who are doing marketing. most of the major YouTube science communicators are doing paid, undisclosed marketing for effective altruists or for political groups. this isn’t hard to spot, but you must be critical and you can’t let yourself be impressed by perceived celebrity, popularity, or production values.

          if you respect science, you have to demand accountability. science is actively under attack and if we don’t do anything to defend it, we will be in a new dark age. this is the moment, and you don’t have to do much. you just have to be very loud and very unforgiving.

          xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
          xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
          xan@xantronix.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #40

          @zzt "shame on Green but he's just a poor helpless mediocre white guy" is the only string of words that makes sense in this context

          cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • xan@xantronix.socialX xan@xantronix.social

            @zzt "shame on Green but he's just a poor helpless mediocre white guy" is the only string of words that makes sense in this context

            cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cyberquixote@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #41

            @xan @zzt

            This is why I am done being told who to like. This is why security matters. This is why trust matters.

            We need a different model

            xan@xantronix.socialX 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC cyberquixote@infosec.exchange

              @xan @zzt

              This is why I am done being told who to like. This is why security matters. This is why trust matters.

              We need a different model

              xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
              xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
              xan@xantronix.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #42

              @cyberquixote might I recommend the Autism Model

              encounter new thing, spend a significant period of time in consideration of thing before deciding to engage in an uncritical analysis of thing, learn about history of usage and funding of thing before committing to thing, which leads you to using or caring about fewer thing

              @zzt

              cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • giflian@techhub.socialG giflian@techhub.social

                @zzt I remember when Scishow put out a dumb/incorrect video about knitting last year that some people speculated that his team had used AI to write it. It was definitely "phoned in" one way or another. So the current controversy isn't as surprising to me as it might've been.

                I wish more people recognized that the AI boosters and AI doomers are both on the same team.

                sollat@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                sollat@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                sollat@masto.ai
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #43

                @giflian @zzt
                I ran into a reaction video about the current controversy (if it can be called that) and thought about that bs knitting video and other links YouTube has shown me that smelled like further bs.

                I have no stake in this, having never heard of him before the knitting one. If anything, I feel happy my bs detector has been validated.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                  @hipsterelectron @davidgerard there are many more types of addicts than substance abuse addicts

                  an LLM addiction is close in mechanism and outcome to a gambling addiction. a gambler in the throes of their addiction is absolutely making dogshit decisions. I don’t feel an overwhelming urge to have sympathy for an active gambler or an active LLM addict, as both are still doing damage to the people around them.

                  maybe that’s unkind of me. I don’t know if kindness helps here. in my lifetime I’ve physically dragged multiple people away from slot machines before they spent money they really shouldn’t, and I’ve lent a couple hundred bucks to a friend who spent the last of their grocery money on Overwatch loot boxes (yes really). the latter was more kind, but it sure as fuck didn’t stop them from hurting me.

                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #44

                  @zzt I've dealt with people addicted to things that aren't substances. Video games, pornography...Those things invite lying, misuse of finances, and an inability to function as a full human being just like other addictive substances we would recognize.

                  (And, as an indie author, I also recognize that much of the advice around ebooks involves feeding an addiction.)

                  I'm sorry if Green is suffering from addiction to LLMs. But he's not getting a walk on all else.

                  @hipsterelectron @davidgerard

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                    hey so about your favorite boy hank green. it’s such a shame that he went overboard with the LLM stuff, that was impossible to see coming, good on him for realizing he was addicted right? well wishes for the good boy!

                    anyway there’s smoking gun evidence that he was paid by effective altruists to do marketing for the “AI is so dangerous but so revolutionary” flavor of critihype. this is alleged by hank green expert hank green in the washington post, as well as an EA in charge of influencer marketing. he was literally being paid by TESCREALs.

                    someone in the same community ran a program where TikTokers were required to post an AI critihype video a day in a cult-like environment where they were subjected to “voluntary” waterboarding and other forms of indoctrination. I’m not kidding, this literal thing happened.

                    here’s @davidgerard’s pivot to AI with the evidence linked: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/08/06/the-ai-doomsday-cult-recruits-social-media-influencers/

                    eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eestileib@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #45

                    @zzt @davidgerard

                    Re: the waterboarding

                    Unsatisfied with reinventing the train and the taxi, tech bros have now moved on to reinventing the bdsm scene!

                    🙄

                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • xan@xantronix.socialX xan@xantronix.social

                      @cyberquixote might I recommend the Autism Model

                      encounter new thing, spend a significant period of time in consideration of thing before deciding to engage in an uncritical analysis of thing, learn about history of usage and funding of thing before committing to thing, which leads you to using or caring about fewer thing

                      @zzt

                      cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cyberquixote@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #46

                      @xan @zzt

                      sounds cool never heard of it

                      xan@xantronix.socialX 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                        @davidgerard I’m very serious about this by the way

                        if you respect science, you must not forgive hank green. you must spread the word on what he’s done, especially if you used to be a fan. this is corruption in the raw and what he’s done must be known.

                        if you respect science, you must verify the claims of science communicators independently and reject any who are doing marketing. most of the major YouTube science communicators are doing paid, undisclosed marketing for effective altruists or for political groups. this isn’t hard to spot, but you must be critical and you can’t let yourself be impressed by perceived celebrity, popularity, or production values.

                        if you respect science, you have to demand accountability. science is actively under attack and if we don’t do anything to defend it, we will be in a new dark age. this is the moment, and you don’t have to do much. you just have to be very loud and very unforgiving.

                        eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                        eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                        eestileib@tech.lgbt
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #47

                        @zzt @davidgerard

                        The part in the article where Hank said "yeah I don't really believe it but it's important to platform people with all opinions" is when he went from "this guy is squirrely and talks really fast, I don't enjoy his content so I'll pass" to "nope not interested".

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC cyberquixote@infosec.exchange

                          @xan @zzt

                          sounds cool never heard of it

                          xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                          xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                          xan@xantronix.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #48

                          @cyberquixote you just gotta wear your autism like an albacore around your neck to remind you of the weight of your responsibilities to the world @zzt

                          jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • michaeltbacon@social.coopM michaeltbacon@social.coop

                            @zzt @davidgerard

                            Shame on Green, but if I permanently banned everyone on the internet who did something colossally stupid or bought into some terrible narrative before, I would have no one but a couple of totally insufferable arseholes and some teenagers who joined the internet yesterday to talk to. (And folk wouldn’t talk to me either)

                            eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eestileib@tech.lgbt
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #49

                            @MichaelTBacon @zzt @davidgerard

                            I have seen people saying "it's not right to unfollow Hank Green just because he made a mistake" and oh hell no.

                            He's not entitled to anyone's attention.

                            Granted, the only video of his I ever watched was an AI doom video sent by a booster friend of mine, so it's not going to be any change in my lifestyle to not give a shit about what Hank Green said.

                            siobibblecoms@tech.lgbtS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • eestileib@tech.lgbtE eestileib@tech.lgbt

                              @zzt @davidgerard

                              Re: the waterboarding

                              Unsatisfied with reinventing the train and the taxi, tech bros have now moved on to reinventing the bdsm scene!

                              🙄

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #50

                              @eestileib @zzt Aella's been hard at work on that, *just asking questions* about fucking children, fucking animals, race science and of course consenting non-consent (first consent optional)

                              eestileib@tech.lgbtE 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                @eestileib @zzt Aella's been hard at work on that, *just asking questions* about fucking children, fucking animals, race science and of course consenting non-consent (first consent optional)

                                eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eestileib@tech.lgbt
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #51

                                @davidgerard @zzt

                                I left off the "... but skeevier and worse" in my last post, figuring that was implied about tech bros at this point.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • eestileib@tech.lgbtE eestileib@tech.lgbt

                                  @MichaelTBacon @zzt @davidgerard

                                  I have seen people saying "it's not right to unfollow Hank Green just because he made a mistake" and oh hell no.

                                  He's not entitled to anyone's attention.

                                  Granted, the only video of his I ever watched was an AI doom video sent by a booster friend of mine, so it's not going to be any change in my lifestyle to not give a shit about what Hank Green said.

                                  siobibblecoms@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  siobibblecoms@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  siobibblecoms@tech.lgbt
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #52

                                  @eestileib @MichaelTBacon @zzt @davidgerard i never got around to subscribing to hank green or scishow, but i have clicked the "dont show me this channel again button" and watched Evie Unraveling's excellent remake of the infamous knitting video

                                  michaeltbacon@social.coopM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #53

                                    @Rycochet @zzt @davidgerard "Would anyone be...?"
                                    Me? no.
                                    The people defending him for shilling for LLM companies? Probably.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                                      hey so about your favorite boy hank green. it’s such a shame that he went overboard with the LLM stuff, that was impossible to see coming, good on him for realizing he was addicted right? well wishes for the good boy!

                                      anyway there’s smoking gun evidence that he was paid by effective altruists to do marketing for the “AI is so dangerous but so revolutionary” flavor of critihype. this is alleged by hank green expert hank green in the washington post, as well as an EA in charge of influencer marketing. he was literally being paid by TESCREALs.

                                      someone in the same community ran a program where TikTokers were required to post an AI critihype video a day in a cult-like environment where they were subjected to “voluntary” waterboarding and other forms of indoctrination. I’m not kidding, this literal thing happened.

                                      here’s @davidgerard’s pivot to AI with the evidence linked: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/08/06/the-ai-doomsday-cult-recruits-social-media-influencers/

                                      occurrent@app.wafrn.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      occurrent@app.wafrn.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      occurrent@app.wafrn.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #54

                                      @zzt@mas.to @davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                      Everything I have heard about these ai-quasireligion groups has been really fucking wild and horrid and profoundly fucked up.

                                      I feel like at least some people had been raising the alarm about Hank's repeating these kinds of ea/doom/tescreal/yudkowskirelated ideas for a minute, and questioning why he'd platform this shit and then ignore criticism of it, for quite a while before recent events. No one wants to believe the worst. But what's been the most alarming to me is trying to visit comments or the reddit to process and better understand, and seeing these concerns basically ignored or dismissed. Not just fannish reactivity over criticism, but like very little substantive discussion about the implications of this ideology and his engagement with it??

                                      I think most people who were fans of his work because they thought it was about critical thinking and fun nerdery said 'fuck this' and left a long time ago. But I am deeply concerned about the fanbase he has cultivated since then, because like it or not this guy has huge reach and huge influence and he has proactively sought those things, the 'community' such as it is not the same community as it was before, it is much larger and as always it includes a lot of quite young people. Shit is dangerous. He is a lot of things to a lot of different people and sure man you can be that, but not if you are pushing what is basically an anti human eugenicist-adjacent capitalist ideology in ways that are seemingly designed to be deniable or not obvious. The sheer manipulativeness of that is something I feel like he might have convinced himself is not even wrong? But it is perhaps a lot more noticeable than he thought.


                                      #deeply-mad-about-all-this!!!!!!!!!! #have-been-for-a-few--years-now-but-it-keeps-getting-worse
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • siobibblecoms@tech.lgbtS siobibblecoms@tech.lgbt

                                        @eestileib @MichaelTBacon @zzt @davidgerard i never got around to subscribing to hank green or scishow, but i have clicked the "dont show me this channel again button" and watched Evie Unraveling's excellent remake of the infamous knitting video

                                        michaeltbacon@social.coopM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michaeltbacon@social.coopM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michaeltbacon@social.coop
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #55

                                        @Siobibblecoms @eestileib @zzt @davidgerard

                                        I don't follow Hank Green and don't really feel the need to tell anyone else to. I haven't watched a Hank Green video in I don't know how many years (his one on getting rid of pennies must be at least 15 years old now, that's the one I remember most) and have no idea what the knitting video is or what AI doom videos he's done.

                                        It's the "don't forgive him when he comes back" bit that I thought was on the deranged side. Like really.

                                        Whatever Hank Green has turned into, he's more than just an influencer based on his and John's past advocacy work at the bare minimum. To reduce someone to the dumbest thing they've said in a bad internet take video is best ridiculous and at worst just being excessively mean. A lot of people who know little about the topic have had terrible takes on AI in the last three years.

                                        eestileib@tech.lgbtE davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.placeK kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                          @zzt @davidgerard that's quite a quote.
                                          “It’s really hard to run a fellowship that’s not an indoctrination camp,” Fernandez said. “If you don’t try really hard to not make an indoctrination camp, you will on accident.”

                                          No, it's not. If you're in a cult and making an indoctrination camp, it's hard to pretend that's not what you're doing.

                                          flesh@transfem.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          flesh@transfem.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          flesh@transfem.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #56

                                          @kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place @zzt@mas.to @davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                          I mean, two things can be true.
                                          He's using it as an excuse, but not making a cult can be surprisingly hard.

                                          kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.placeK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper