Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. #Oops: The seminal paper that has been used for 25 years to justify that the use of #Glyphosate is safe has been retracted.

#Oops: The seminal paper that has been used for 25 years to justify that the use of #Glyphosate is safe has been retracted.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
glyphosateoops
2 Indlæg 2 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    #Oops: The seminal paper that has been used for 25 years to justify that the use of #Glyphosate is safe has been retracted.

    "Concerns were raised regarding the authorship of this paper, validity of the research findings in the context of misrepresentation of the contributions by the authors and the study sponsor and potential conflicts of interest of the authors. "

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230099913715

    kims@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

      #Oops: The seminal paper that has been used for 25 years to justify that the use of #Glyphosate is safe has been retracted.

      "Concerns were raised regarding the authorship of this paper, validity of the research findings in the context of misrepresentation of the contributions by the authors and the study sponsor and potential conflicts of interest of the authors. "

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230099913715

      kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      kims@mas.to
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @jwildeboer
      Any mention of Monsanto requires me to quote @pluralistic

      "You'll recall that Bayer merged with Monsanto in 2018, paying $66b in an all-cash deal and erasing the Monsanto name (apparently, they judged Bayer's association with Auschwitz to be preferable to Monsanto's association with Roundup)."

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • abekonge@venner.networkA abekonge@venner.network shared this topic
      Svar
      • Svar som emne
      Login for at svare
      • Ældste til nyeste
      • Nyeste til ældste
      • Most Votes


      • Log ind

      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      Graciously hosted by data.coop
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Hjem
      • Seneste
      • Etiketter
      • Populære
      • Verden
      • Bruger
      • Grupper