You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.

@beyondmachines1
And maybe 40% of the time it's garbage, but plausible. Without the experts you fired, you don't know when it's wrong.

So even if it was free, it would only really be a toy.

@beyondmachines1 yeah the security aspect has been bugging me this whole time. Like, do you REALLY want to surrender your logic to a competing tech company? Who gets to just steal / train on your hole business model? Who you incidentally just handed all your data to?

Okay mr executive. Mr risk taker. Mr get bailed out whenever you make a mistake

@beyondmachines1 the CEOs are the ones without souls or skin in the game. They always get bailed out.

@beyondmachines1 Good luck re-hiring those people - or hiring any people at all. They now know exactly what they are worth to you.

@beyondmachines1 Why are so many of these anti-ai posts so obviously written by an LLM?

@beyondmachines1 To be fair, AI has its use, right? Maybe the business model just got to be better, maybe token count might need tweaking -- maybe put weight to something like output value, rather than input/output count.
To be sure, AI should not replace humans, rather augment us.

@beyondmachines1

You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.

No,
You gave everything to a shitty american billionair oligarch with no morals....

Now he has patented or sold your ideas and you, the fool, can pay for your own work. Forever...

@kepeken spacing paragraphs and using short sentences is not an indicator of LLMs. It's what we used to call "effective writing" back when I was young.
Which is why it's used by LLMs, of course, since they're trained on stuff that survived and is available (so, likely, the most effective).
Also, it's been the standard communication style on LinkedIn for several years as well so any corpo would probably try to emulate it.

@beyondmachines1

@beyondmachines1

@pgcd @kepeken to me that also read as LLM slop, and not just because of the short sentences.

@jaseg I know, and I agree that it _looks_ like AI slop. But that doesn't mean it _is_ AI slop, since the whole point of LLMs is to make stuff that looks like a human could've written it.
Not all cans of Campbell's soup are a Warhol painting, I mean (although some are).

@kepeken

@jaseg @kepeken
Folx, don't accuse other people of slop if you're basing on vibes only.

As @pgcd mentioned “AI” extrusions are designed to mimic human works.

And yes, you can fondle a prompt to do this, yet I would argue that there is less chance for an “AI”-critical person to do this.

@dzwiedziu well said.

Also, TBH, this is one case where I agree with the message enough that I'd be sharing it even if it had been written by Elmo Skum.

@jaseg @kepeken

@beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange i think that post was slopped

@beyondmachines1

@beyondmachines1 Don't forget that AI consumes power and water but is not a consumer and will not be buying products and services in the way that people would. Thus, CEOs have sufficiently increased the cost of creating products and services and have completely eliminated income from consumers who can no longer buy them. Lose lose.

@fightscore @beyondmachines1 Real AI sure, but the stochastic parrot LLMs not so much. I used to call them "machine lying" but lying requires knowledge of true and false and LLMs do not have that.

@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 It's really expected - they're just adhering to the hype that Generative Autocomplete can do all things humans do. If they were at least adopting it as a *tool* and not joining that specific hype, they'd be able to see that problem right away, or at least avoid it...

@beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange

this isnt going to matter to any c suite retards until ai bankrupts a large company (which seems unlikely) and they start a trend of posting on linkedin about the problem.