Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
15 Indlæg 11 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • fh0@mastodon.socialF fh0@mastodon.social

    @hagen the hope is to have a general personal assistant that simply does all the stuff you tell them, without first figuring out what other software you need to run it and a good place to integrate something somewhere

    hagen@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hagen@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hagen@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    @fh0 sure but that’s not even how actual personal assistants work.

    fh0@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hagen@mastodon.socialH hagen@mastodon.social

      @fh0 sure but that’s not even how actual personal assistants work.

      fh0@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      fh0@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      fh0@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @hagen I don't think that matters, it's the reason why people use it instead of integrating it in homeassistant (your original question)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

        Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

        sebastianlaube@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
        sebastianlaube@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
        sebastianlaube@layer8.space
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @tante The interesting thing about your observation is convinience.

        You don't have to buy a device that you have to assemble, setup with absolutely unfamiliar software and configure all the things your self.

        Now they set up one or two user accounts and will be guided quite comfortably through the setup.

        This reveals the weakness FOSS always had: the lack of user experience.

        I don't like these agents, but I wish we get motivated by this to do better UX in FOSS.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

          Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

          skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          skjeggtroll@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @tante

          We used to just call it "automation."

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

            Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

            research_ftw@sciences.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            research_ftw@sciences.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            research_ftw@sciences.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @tante "How can we do this thing we could do already with way more compute so we can prop up the failing fossil fuel industry"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

              Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

              elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
              elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
              elrohir@mastodon.gal
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @tante The sad truth is that what drives adoption of a technology is not its technical design but social dynamics. A lot of these people are embracing AI not because they could not automate default email templates ten years ago, but because ten years ago they couldn't be arsed to find out if it was even possible, whereas nowadays they all of a sudden feel pressured to do it because everyone else is doing it. And what bothers me the most is they will then claim that it was impossible 10 years ago

              elrohir@mastodon.galE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elrohir@mastodon.galE elrohir@mastodon.gal

                @tante The sad truth is that what drives adoption of a technology is not its technical design but social dynamics. A lot of these people are embracing AI not because they could not automate default email templates ten years ago, but because ten years ago they couldn't be arsed to find out if it was even possible, whereas nowadays they all of a sudden feel pressured to do it because everyone else is doing it. And what bothers me the most is they will then claim that it was impossible 10 years ago

                elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
                elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
                elrohir@mastodon.gal
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @tante Someone oughta make an AI agent coffee pot that you can text "BREW" when you want it to make you a cup 😂

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_Protocol

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

                  Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

                  yatil@yatil.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yatil@yatil.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yatil@yatil.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @tante But it is so much more exciting if it only works 50% of the time and there is a 1% chance that it erases your hard drive!

                  So much entertainment value!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                    @tante They want it to feel like a personal secretary who can't say no, not like a CLI. That's the whole appeal to them.

                    downey@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    downey@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    downey@floss.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @dalias @tante

                    I think a better term may be "latent human desire for slavery"

                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      At least 70% of things I read about people doing with "AI" assistants like "Open Claw" are basically things people have been doing with deterministic, secure tools like Home Assistant for years.

                      Oh you can tell your bot to dim the lights via WhatsApp chat? Welcome to 2015!

                      greg@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                      greg@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                      greg@icosahedron.website
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @tante I WAS THERE WHEN IFTTT WAS NEW! I WAS THERE!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • downey@floss.socialD downey@floss.social

                        @dalias @tante

                        I think a better term may be "latent human desire for slavery"

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.io
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        @downey @tante Yes, though I'm not sure what "latent" implies here. I don't think it's something intrinsic - most of us find the idea repulsive, and this is probably part of our visceral reaction to "AI" "assistants". Rather, I think people who've been indoctrinated into hierarchical power structures where they observe their bosses "getting to" behave like that develop it as an aspiration. And for the bosses, the appeal is that the thing they're giving orders to like it's a person can't say no to them and can't be secretly trying to achieve goals at odds with them(*).

                        (*) LMAO that's exactly what all the "AI" chatbots are doing when they scoop up all your trade secrets for Google and Microsoft to exploit.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper