Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look!

If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
28 Indlæg 25 Posters 111 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

    If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look! we’ve got one too! oh no! look at us!!” story.

    alekairos@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    alekairos@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    alekairos@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #21

    @inthehands “più vera del vero, tale è la simulazione”, così sintetizza Baudrillard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

      If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look! we’ve got one too! oh no! look at us!!” story.

      compfu@mograph.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      compfu@mograph.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      compfu@mograph.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #22

      @inthehands A very pro AI blog quoted some posts from X that claim that of course it's not a PR stunt because... well... "just because". https://neunetz.com/naturlich-war-es-kein-pr-stunt/

      The quoted posts from X seem to assume that the AI companies are a normal money earning industry. And not a money burning one that is desperate for government bailouts and contracts....

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

        If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look! we’ve got one too! oh no! look at us!!” story.

        niall@mastodon.nzN This user is from outside of this forum
        niall@mastodon.nzN This user is from outside of this forum
        niall@mastodon.nz
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #23

        @inthehands my dog escaped the yard again. Give me a trillion dollars because I'm sure he'll show the path to AGI soon.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • r343l@freeradical.zoneR r343l@freeradical.zone

          @isagalaev @Npars01 @inthehands Hell, they've tried to prosecute people for "hacking" when merely finding, accessing and reporting public s3 buckets. But I guess if the mystical AI does it, it's not criminal or even incompetence.

          kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #24

          @r343l @isagalaev @Npars01 @inthehands

          Or pressing F12 to view source. LOL

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #25

            @Arapalla @inthehands
            It does feel like an arms race. They know there's too many players in the game for all of them to ever turn a profit. But if one US AI firm manages to take out all the others, then they might eek out a profit from companies & users who won't use a Chinese AI.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

              If these incidents were truly as represented, they'd be colossal embarrassments. The AI vendors would be trying to bury them, not trumpet them.

              quixote@mastodon.nzQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixote@mastodon.nzQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixote@mastodon.nz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #26

              @inthehands It smelled of an ad for the IPO to me.

              But I guess what we need is actual proof.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                If you doubted that the “oh noes our agent escaped containment” schtick from OpenAI was anything other than marketing, note Anthropic’s “look look! we’ve got one too! oh no! look at us!!” story.

                gray17@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gray17@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gray17@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #27

                RE: https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/117015434798858894

                @inthehands

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                  Both these replies point at a common thread: these news stories represent a grotesque failure of either the vendors or their products.

                  If the agents did in fact “go rogue” and cause damage, even in the hands of the people who should be their most competent operators, then the product is unpredictable, unreliable, and unfit for purpose.

                  If the product is •not• in fact unfit for purpose, then that means there's some combination of negligence and malice behind these incidents, and they are at •best• knowing harm in service of a marketing stunt or (as Parsons argue) something even worse.

                  1. https://peoplemaking.games/@aubilenon/117012729959327465

                  2. https://mstdn.social/@Npars01/117012715615344732

                  energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  energisch_@troet.cafe
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #28

                  @inthehands If this situation was intended as an advertisement to get more money out of certain investors, I do hope it backfires. And backfires to such an intend that they have to pull their product OFF the market completely.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                  Svar
                  • Svar som emne
                  Login for at svare
                  • Ældste til nyeste
                  • Nyeste til ældste
                  • Most Votes


                  • Log ind

                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Hjem
                  • Seneste
                  • Etiketter
                  • Populære
                  • Verden
                  • Bruger
                  • Grupper