Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Everybody has to coordinate with Starlink because SPACEX CONTROLS ORBIT.

Everybody has to coordinate with Starlink because SPACEX CONTROLS ORBIT.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
78 Indlæg 62 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Oof. My dark sarcasm levels have shot through the roof and entered orbit. Time to sign off for the night.

    ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    ewen@social.ewenbell.com
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #47
    @sundogplanets

    The situation is also through the roof. We're with you. We're glad someone is paying attention.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      But DON'T WORRY EVERYONE, the FCC will almost certainly approve SpaceX's one million satellite filing soon, so this will seem like nothing!

      artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@climatejustice.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #48

      @sundogplanets that line of the tune from Firefly/Serenity regularly comes to mind -
      'Take my love, take my land
      Take me where I cannot stand
      I don't care, I'm still free
      You can't take the sky from me...'

      Turns out they can, in fact, take the sky from me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        But DON'T WORRY EVERYONE, the FCC will almost certainly approve SpaceX's one million satellite filing soon, so this will seem like nothing!

        stuartyeates@cloudisland.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
        stuartyeates@cloudisland.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
        stuartyeates@cloudisland.nz
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #49

        @sundogplanets

        Don't worry, a single EMP in low earth orbit should take them all out, right?

        phasorburn@phasorburn.comP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          SpaceX just got approved for 15,000 more direct-to-cell satellites: https://www.fcc.gov/document/spacex-approved-ngso-mss-system-direct-device-services

          Giant, bright, radio-loud. Fuck. I just saw SO MANY SATELLITES in my sky. Guess there will be more. And then lots of debris.

          michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
          michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
          michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #50

          @sundogplanets

          Meanwhile, I am not aware of anyone I know personally who has ever used direct-to-cell satellite service.

          Making even more mess of the sky for no reason at all...

          (I have known people who used Starlink until they could find a better alternative.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • syvash@mastodon.socialS syvash@mastodon.social

            @f4grx @sundogplanets sorry but we need satellite communications, kessler syndrome would mean we go into WW3 with a much larger handicap than already now (which in turn increases the likelihood of WW3)

            kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
            kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
            kanamauna@sauropods.win
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #51

            @sundogplanets @syvash @f4grx these bastards would definitely use a Kessler event as an excuse for WWIII

            f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

              @sundogplanets We should rebrand SpaceX™️ == SpaceTrash™️

              aardvark@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              aardvark@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              aardvark@ioc.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #52

              @stux @sundogplanets TrashX

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                But DON'T WORRY EVERYONE, the FCC will almost certainly approve SpaceX's one million satellite filing soon, so this will seem like nothing!

                bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #53

                @sundogplanets

                I tried to start writing parody lyrics to Eminem's stanza in “Without Me” that starts 🎶 The FCC won't let me be … 🎶 but didn't get very far.

                And I sure as 🤬 am not going to burn data center time spending LLM-gen-AI tokens on making the joke for me (it wouldn't be good anyway).

                So, please insert here a stanza of your own making to the tune of that rap about FCC, Elon Musk, and Starlink.

                Come to think of it, I suspect Elon & Eminem might share a worldview. 🤔
                cc: @jrdepriest

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Oof. My dark sarcasm levels have shot through the roof and entered orbit. Time to sign off for the night.

                  ldmay65@universeodon.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  ldmay65@universeodon.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  ldmay65@universeodon.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #54

                  @sundogplanets
                  Some situations call for dark sarcasm.

                  nxskok@cupoftea.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • octothorpe@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                    octothorpe@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                    octothorpe@mastodon.online
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #55

                    @geolaw @sundogplanets I’m really referring to the issue of overloading orbit making space stuff ostensibly impossible.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • boelder@shakedown.socialB boelder@shakedown.social

                      @sundogplanets

                      What are these metals doing to our upper atmosphere after de-orbit? At one point, we'd have insisted on studying this extensively before launching tens of thousands of satellites that will eventually come back down ... now, when you're a trillionaire, they just let you do it.

                      bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bhasic@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #56

                      @boelder @sundogplanets They will destroy the ozone layer.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        But DON'T WORRY EVERYONE, the FCC will almost certainly approve SpaceX's one million satellite filing soon, so this will seem like nothing!

                        kristinhenry@vis.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kristinhenry@vis.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kristinhenry@vis.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #57

                        @sundogplanets ugh 😭

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ldmay65@universeodon.comL ldmay65@universeodon.com

                          @sundogplanets
                          Some situations call for dark sarcasm.

                          nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nxskok@cupoftea.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #58

                          @ldmay65 @sundogplanets but not in the classroom. Teacher, leave them kids alone (all in all, you're just another brick in the wall).

                          nxskok@cupoftea.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Everybody has to coordinate with Starlink because SPACEX CONTROLS ORBIT. That's against the Outer Space Treaty.

                            Your engineering challenge, SpaceX, is to provide your services with fewer satellites. Not yell at everyone else for having satellites too.

                            https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/117407452552952599

                            not2b@sfba.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            not2b@sfba.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            not2b@sfba.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #59

                            @sundogplanets They say they have to do 1000 evasive maneuvers per day. I would guess that as the number of manuvers needed would go up as the square of the number of objects, since every satellite has to avoid every other one. If so, if they make their fleet 10x larger which is less than they plan to, wouldn't they need to do 100k panic moves per day?

                            phasorburn@phasorburn.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • stuartyeates@cloudisland.nzS stuartyeates@cloudisland.nz

                              @sundogplanets

                              Don't worry, a single EMP in low earth orbit should take them all out, right?

                              phasorburn@phasorburn.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phasorburn@phasorburn.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phasorburn@phasorburn.com
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #60
                              @stuartyeates @sundogplanets Multiple EMP would be needed since they encompass the earth in a shell. Then the satellites would not be able to be controlled for collision avoidance. Hello Kessler Syndrome.

                              Better to just ask Grok to take control and deorbit them all into the ocean at Point Nemo.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nxskok@cupoftea.socialN nxskok@cupoftea.social

                                @ldmay65 @sundogplanets but not in the classroom. Teacher, leave them kids alone (all in all, you're just another brick in the wall).

                                nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nxskok@cupoftea.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #61

                                @ldmay65 @sundogplanets the irony of one of the people I mentioned being at a university.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • not2b@sfba.socialN not2b@sfba.social

                                  @sundogplanets They say they have to do 1000 evasive maneuvers per day. I would guess that as the number of manuvers needed would go up as the square of the number of objects, since every satellite has to avoid every other one. If so, if they make their fleet 10x larger which is less than they plan to, wouldn't they need to do 100k panic moves per day?

                                  phasorburn@phasorburn.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  phasorburn@phasorburn.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  phasorburn@phasorburn.com
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #62
                                  @not2b @sundogplanets Just need to coat all the starlink satellites in bacon fat so they can slide easily past one another.
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Everybody has to coordinate with Starlink because SPACEX CONTROLS ORBIT. That's against the Outer Space Treaty.

                                    Your engineering challenge, SpaceX, is to provide your services with fewer satellites. Not yell at everyone else for having satellites too.

                                    https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/117407452552952599

                                    gaoadriaan@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gaoadriaan@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gaoadriaan@social.vivaldi.net
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #63

                                    @sundogplanets

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Oof. My dark sarcasm levels have shot through the roof and entered orbit. Time to sign off for the night.

                                      patrickhadfield@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      patrickhadfield@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      patrickhadfield@mastodon.scot
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #64

                                      @sundogplanets ...where you can take direct action against Starlink?!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        SpaceX just got approved for 15,000 more direct-to-cell satellites: https://www.fcc.gov/document/spacex-approved-ngso-mss-system-direct-device-services

                                        Giant, bright, radio-loud. Fuck. I just saw SO MANY SATELLITES in my sky. Guess there will be more. And then lots of debris.

                                        foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        foxxtrot@dice.camp
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #65

                                        @sundogplanets Doesn't SpaceX already have more satellites in orbit than any other organization by a fair margin at this point?

                                        foxxtrot@dice.campF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • foxxtrot@dice.campF foxxtrot@dice.camp

                                          @sundogplanets Doesn't SpaceX already have more satellites in orbit than any other organization by a fair margin at this point?

                                          foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          foxxtrot@dice.campF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          foxxtrot@dice.camp
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #66

                                          @sundogplanets Jesus Christ this is worse than I thought. https://orbitalradar.com/satellites-by-operator

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper