Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
104 Indlæg 52 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

    chrysanthos@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrysanthos@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrysanthos@meow.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @cstross I wish I had any faith in these petitions

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

      @cstross just to point out that Linux, Android and other things have a VPN built in so the results will actually be even more idiotic.
      It will also stop trans kids using Tor to get info, something I am sure labour think is a huge win

      larsmb@mastodon.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
      larsmb@mastodon.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
      larsmb@mastodon.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      @etchedpixels @cstross A lot of the recent legislative moves in the UK & EU both are rather highly incompatible with the use of "unlocked" Open Source systems.

      But a bootloader-locked Android could easily enforce this rule.

      I'm wondering at which time running a FLOSS Operating System on your devices will require a license/permit.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • capriciousday@mastodon.socialC capriciousday@mastodon.social

        @cstross I sort of wonder how my extremely risk averse, security conscious employer who depends on VPNs is going to react to this

        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @capriciousday Like banks and other financial institutions who require their employees to use them when working out of the office, or over wifi *within* the office.

        highlandlawyer@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

          @cstross it's really not that useful a first step.

          It's just what the VPN industry has drummed into us with ubiquitous marketing.

          Just install the "tor browser". It's free, cross platform and provides much more privacy than any VPN.

          If you need true anonymity then use a privacy focused OS like "tails" - also free and uses TOR internally

          Even better, these tools cannot be blocked or gated by governments.

          VPNs are largely useless things sold by people who want your money.

          oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          oschonrock@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @cstross vpns have their place in corporate networks.

          There they provide secure access to internal resources for remote workers.

          They are all but useless for personal privacy / anonymity.

          So while I agree with the principle of your objection to govts gating services - it is actually a faux battle based on misinformation by the VPN industry.

          petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP dalfen@mstdn.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • mbpaz@mas.toM mbpaz@mas.to

            @cstross Ethical issues aside - how are m2m VPNs expected to validate their age?

            "hi, I'm an environment monitoring device and was born barely 6 months ago, but I swear I'm old enough to use my built-in VPN to access my MQTT server"

            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            @mbpaz @cstross Are you suggesting this legislation is being brought in without any technical knowledge just like the Online Safety Act was?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              @Nicovel0 Yes, but it's still toxic and dangerous (and will implicitly criminalize unregistered VPN users).

              jaawerth@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jaawerth@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jaawerth@functional.cafe
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              @cstross @Nicovel0
              Also, I'm only going on my memories of being a kid in the mid-late 90's and the word of mouth proliferation of Napster/shareware, but hard to imagine this not just resulting in kids teaching each other how to use TOR

              ...not that opposite effect is new to this kind of legislation

              dan@axillae.telent.netD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                kbal@fedia.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
                kbal@fedia.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
                kbal@fedia.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                For those who don’t believe that an ordinary commercial VPN service can improve your privacy, here’s a simple experiment you can run at home: Get two similar computers, one with a VPN and one without. Use them both to download Hollywood movies through bittorrent, and see which one results in notifications of incoming lawsuits from movie studios.

                Fortunately, there’s no need to do this experiment yourself. Millions of people around the world have already done it for you.

                david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

                  @cstross vpns have their place in corporate networks.

                  There they provide secure access to internal resources for remote workers.

                  They are all but useless for personal privacy / anonymity.

                  So while I agree with the principle of your objection to govts gating services - it is actually a faux battle based on misinformation by the VPN industry.

                  petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  petersommerlad@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @oschonrock @cstross
                  my major private use case is to circumvent geo blocking of video streaming and access to my home lan

                  oschonrock@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                    tiggy@mastodonapp.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tiggy@mastodonapp.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tiggy@mastodonapp.uk
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @cstross

                    And of course, while inconveniencing or worse ordinary people, it won't stop a determined teenager.
                    Same with physical ID, the ones they want to stop get around the new rules but people in general get more problems upon problems.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP petersommerlad@mastodon.social

                      @oschonrock @cstross
                      my major private use case is to circumvent geo blocking of video streaming and access to my home lan

                      oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oschonrock@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                      Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

                      The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

                      (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

                      petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

                        @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                        Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

                        The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

                        (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

                        petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petersommerlad@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @oschonrock @cstross
                        i want to watch my streaming abos when traveling without having to download things at home. in Switzerland I pay the highest fees anyway.

                        oschonrock@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                          UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                          *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                          davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davecb@hachyderm.io
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @cstross Hmmn, Dave has connected to Royal Bank. I thought he banked at Scotiabank. I wonder if he's up to something? (Yes, actually. diversification and a better deal.)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                            UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                            *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                            fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            @cstross you can run your own VPN, I’ve automated the process in https://github.com/fazalmajid/edgewalker

                            At that point, *you* are the VPN provider and in compliance. Until the next brain dead decision the parasites descended from thugs in the House of Drolls come up with.

                            cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net

                              @cstross you can run your own VPN, I’ve automated the process in https://github.com/fazalmajid/edgewalker

                              At that point, *you* are the VPN provider and in compliance. Until the next brain dead decision the parasites descended from thugs in the House of Drolls come up with.

                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shop
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @fazalmajid Right, so that would require me to learn and install OpenBSD and a full stack. (The last BSD I used in anger was SunOS 4.1.3.)

                              fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • petersommerlad@mastodon.socialP petersommerlad@mastodon.social

                                @oschonrock @cstross
                                i want to watch my streaming abos when traveling without having to download things at home. in Switzerland I pay the highest fees anyway.

                                oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oschonrock@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                                So in the context of this discussion, and if you lived in the UK, would you object to being age/identity verified when purchasing your vpn subscription?

                                It is almost certainly not an annonymous transaction anyway, as those are very very difficult to execute..?

                                fonant@social.vivaldi.netF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                  UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                  *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                  elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  elricofmelnibone@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #27

                                  @cstross It would be nice if the government would encourage parents to do the actual parenting, instead of trying to force their idea of parenting down everyone's throats.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    @Nicovel0 Yes, but it's still toxic and dangerous (and will implicitly criminalize unregistered VPN users).

                                    nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nicovel0@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #28

                                    @cstross oh absolutely, I have signed three petition. I don’t expect it will have any effect but we have to try.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jaawerth@functional.cafeJ jaawerth@functional.cafe

                                      @cstross @Nicovel0
                                      Also, I'm only going on my memories of being a kid in the mid-late 90's and the word of mouth proliferation of Napster/shareware, but hard to imagine this not just resulting in kids teaching each other how to use TOR

                                      ...not that opposite effect is new to this kind of legislation

                                      dan@axillae.telent.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dan@axillae.telent.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dan@axillae.telent.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #29

                                      @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 the amendment does not appear to define "virtual private network", so ... does it include TOR? SSH SOCKS proxy? L2TP? PPPoE?

                                      nicovel0@mastodon.socialN drwho@masto.hackers.townD only_ohm@mas.toO 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                        UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                        *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                        cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cybervegan@autistics.lifeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cybervegan@autistics.life
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #30

                                        @cstross They don't even know what a VPN is or does. They tried to do this with e2e encryption key escrow, to include vpns in about 2017 and then quietly dropped it probably because someone has pointed out that businesses use them extensively for commerce comms and b2b services. Regardless of whether or not the positive effects they want are achieved (they won't be) the negatives will far outweigh them, and it still won't protect kids any better.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dan@axillae.telent.netD dan@axillae.telent.net

                                          @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 the amendment does not appear to define "virtual private network", so ... does it include TOR? SSH SOCKS proxy? L2TP? PPPoE?

                                          nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nicovel0@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #31

                                          @dan @jaawerth @cstross the judge will know when they take a look at it.

                                          jaawerth@functional.cafeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper