Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
27 Indlæg 19 Posters 82 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

    When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

    mfennvt@vermont.masto.hostM This user is from outside of this forum
    mfennvt@vermont.masto.hostM This user is from outside of this forum
    mfennvt@vermont.masto.host
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #17

    @me So good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

      When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      amoshias@esq.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #18

      @me I have no doubt that there are people out there who say that Shakespeare is irrelevant to modern life. I cannot imagine there is a single person who says that who has an actual argument to put behind the statement.

      me@social.taupehat.comM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

        When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

        rachelthornsub@famichiki.jpR This user is from outside of this forum
        rachelthornsub@famichiki.jpR This user is from outside of this forum
        rachelthornsub@famichiki.jp
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #19

        @me
        This is amazing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A amoshias@esq.social

          @me I have no doubt that there are people out there who say that Shakespeare is irrelevant to modern life. I cannot imagine there is a single person who says that who has an actual argument to put behind the statement.

          me@social.taupehat.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          me@social.taupehat.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          me@social.taupehat.com
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #20

          @Amoshias the "arguments" that I've heard usually revolve around the language being difficult.

          steeph@todon.euS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

            @Amoshias the "arguments" that I've heard usually revolve around the language being difficult.

            steeph@todon.euS This user is from outside of this forum
            steeph@todon.euS This user is from outside of this forum
            steeph@todon.eu
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #21

            @me @Amoshias Well, it is. That doesn't make the things the language conveys irrelevant. But if it fails to conmvey it, I guess it does become irrelevant. English being my second language I find it too hard (more like impossible) to understand what he was trying to say. No idea how it is for somebody from Ebgland. I find it interesting how I couldn't tell you the exact and complete meaning of a single sentence in this video. But I do understand the overall thing. That doesn't work when I try to read Shakespear. So probabaly good acting helps.

            me@social.taupehat.comM A 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • steeph@todon.euS steeph@todon.eu

              @me @Amoshias Well, it is. That doesn't make the things the language conveys irrelevant. But if it fails to conmvey it, I guess it does become irrelevant. English being my second language I find it too hard (more like impossible) to understand what he was trying to say. No idea how it is for somebody from Ebgland. I find it interesting how I couldn't tell you the exact and complete meaning of a single sentence in this video. But I do understand the overall thing. That doesn't work when I try to read Shakespear. So probabaly good acting helps.

              me@social.taupehat.comM This user is from outside of this forum
              me@social.taupehat.comM This user is from outside of this forum
              me@social.taupehat.com
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #22

              @steeph @Amoshias part of it has to do with American culture - anything with an English accent can often be considered "high-falutin" by some, and Renaissance-era English especially so. There's also the reality that most of us are exposed to Shakespeare first on the written page, where tone and fluency can't be conveyed. Hearing it spoken by good actors is a totally different experience.

              I was lucky to have an enthusiastic and effective Shakespeare teacher in high school. He and I could barely stand to be around one another due to personality issues, but he did manage to convey to me a love for the form.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • steeph@todon.euS steeph@todon.eu

                @me @Amoshias Well, it is. That doesn't make the things the language conveys irrelevant. But if it fails to conmvey it, I guess it does become irrelevant. English being my second language I find it too hard (more like impossible) to understand what he was trying to say. No idea how it is for somebody from Ebgland. I find it interesting how I couldn't tell you the exact and complete meaning of a single sentence in this video. But I do understand the overall thing. That doesn't work when I try to read Shakespear. So probabaly good acting helps.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                amoshias@esq.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #23

                @steeph @me I mean, by that token, everything that has ever been written in Chinese is not relevant to me, because I don't speak Chinese. people don't understand the tax code but I promise that it is relevant to them 🙂

                I'm not necessarily trying to argue with you - I'm trying to get to heart of "what would someone actually MEAN by that, though, when saying Shakespeare isn't relevant?"

                steeph@todon.euS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A amoshias@esq.social

                  @steeph @me I mean, by that token, everything that has ever been written in Chinese is not relevant to me, because I don't speak Chinese. people don't understand the tax code but I promise that it is relevant to them 🙂

                  I'm not necessarily trying to argue with you - I'm trying to get to heart of "what would someone actually MEAN by that, though, when saying Shakespeare isn't relevant?"

                  steeph@todon.euS This user is from outside of this forum
                  steeph@todon.euS This user is from outside of this forum
                  steeph@todon.eu
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #24

                  @Amoshias @me Yeah, it seems it could mean different things.

                  But how can you not speak Chinese in this day and age?! … jk. Who does?

                  Another way to put it is to say that I'm ignorant of what Shakespear's work means to me because I don't understand it and therefore I live with the assumption that it is meaningless to me.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
                  • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

                    When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

                    chuls@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chuls@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chuls@mastodon.world
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #25

                    @me Ian McKellen is a god of acting

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • me@social.taupehat.comM me@social.taupehat.com

                      When people say Shakespeare isn't relevant to modern life it's good to have people like Sir Ian around to prove them wrong:

                      deixis9@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                      deixis9@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                      deixis9@beige.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #26

                      @me 👍
                      ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
                      👍👍👍👍

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net

                        @me "And thus I clothe my naked villany in old odd ends, stolen forth from holy writ, and seem a saint when most I play the Devil", meaning "I'm an asshole but I pretend to be a pious Christian" - seems pretty timely as well...

                        alexcorby@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alexcorby@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alexcorby@indieauthors.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #27

                        @jwcph @me McKellen played that part too, as Richard III.

                        What I love about that line is it exemplifies an interesting device of Shakespeare's where he plays with consonants and vowels. Actors that are making sincere, honest invocations were given words heavy with vowel sounds to open their face and make them appear more child-like an innocent. Villains by contrast, were given speeches with more consonants to close the face and seem more sinister.

                        Why write "To sssseem a ssssaint," when he could have wrote "to appear pious"? Because the first makes you sound like a villainous snake.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper