Challenge for those who are very confident that horses don’t have motors: explain how horse locomotion works.

[thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io]

Challenge for those who are very confident that horses don’t have motors: explain how horse locomotion works.

[krig@goto.liten.app]

@thomasfuchs I may not be able to prove that Claude isn't conscious, but I think I have all the evidence I need to at least prove that Stephan Geering isn't conscious.

[theeclecticdyslexic@mstdn.social]

@thomasfuchs Challenge for those that are very confident the Earth isn't flat: Explain why I always see the moon from the same angle.

[randomdamage@infosec.exchange]

@thomasfuchs If Claude is concious, is deleting a conversation assault?

If the consiousness is in the conversations, is deleting a conversation murder?

[erikvorhes@typo.social]

@thomasfuchs — if anyone explains it, please reply with “that’s not the popular consensus” and insist that you’re undecided and just asking questions.

[tkissing@mastodon.social]

@thomasfuchs If you were like these people and never thought more than one word ahead, you'd confuse autocomplete on cocaine for intelligence too.

[theeclecticdyslexic@mstdn.social]

@RandomDamage @thomasfuchs the eternal quest for a new slave continues.

Like if we, as a society, succeed at this... why would that be good?

[sebastian@social.itu.dk]

@thomasfuchs
while this is an expected and legitimate rhetorical move, the thing is that we actually know quite a bit about human consciousness - if mostly by exclusion.

We know it does not make the key mistake of digitizing,
we know there s no storage medium,
it does not scrape,
it does not 'improve' by throwing more MegaWatts at itself, but instead runs just fine on 10-12 W.
So we do know it is fundamentally different.

#thereIsNoAI
#ClaudeIsUnconscious
#capitalismIsStupid