Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. RFK Jr has no scientific training.

RFK Jr has no scientific training.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
41 Indlæg 26 Posters 18 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ogjester@pnw.zoneO ogjester@pnw.zone

    @SeanCasten The bigger problem is that a majority of U.S. senators sat in a room with that guy, asked him questions for several days, and concluded that the most ridiculous, unqualified person possible should be in charge of the nation’s health department.

    atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
    atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
    atleagle@mastodon.online
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #31

    @OGJester @SeanCasten yep. The idea that a president should automatically get his choice and the senate should t stand in the way is asinine. Advice and consent is there for a reason. A unanimous "absolutely not" was the only correct outcome

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sidhewolf@mastodon.socialS sidhewolf@mastodon.social

      @BlueDot @SeanCasten homie just got finished telling you that politicians don’t necessarily get at the exact truth, and he’s a scientist he’s not gonna say the word evil if he can help it 😆💀

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #32

      @sidhewolf @BlueDot @SeanCasten

      the problem with the word "evil" is that it's a kid's fairytale word and is popular with various crackpots

      so we shun use of the word because of a vague discomfort, a feeling of guilt by association

      but shunning use of the word "evil" means we surrender a powerful tool of communication

      so i say:

      use the word "evil"

      with our definition

      reclaim speech rather than surrender speech

      owen_g_richards@writing.exchangeO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @sidhewolf @BlueDot @SeanCasten

        the problem with the word "evil" is that it's a kid's fairytale word and is popular with various crackpots

        so we shun use of the word because of a vague discomfort, a feeling of guilt by association

        but shunning use of the word "evil" means we surrender a powerful tool of communication

        so i say:

        use the word "evil"

        with our definition

        reclaim speech rather than surrender speech

        owen_g_richards@writing.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
        owen_g_richards@writing.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
        owen_g_richards@writing.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #33

        @benroyce @sidhewolf @BlueDot @SeanCasten

        Far too many politicians are EVIL in the literal as well as figurative sense.

        Self-interest vs service to the community? Pfft! Meh! Pshaw!

        Self-interested megalomaniacs always want the role ahead of anyone who actually might be capable of doing it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

          The danger however comes when we confuse his title for his expertise. "Secretary of Health Kennedy says ___" gives the air of legitimacy. Far better to say "Heroin addict Kennedy", "Man who eats road kill and has a brain worm", "Harvard drug dealer" or even "Nuzzi's ex boyfriend".

          theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
          theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
          theorangetheme@en.osm.town
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #34

          @SeanCasten "Raccoon penis severer Kennedy".

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

            RFK Jr has no scientific training. He's a history major with a law degree who worked as an environmental advocate but has never spent any meaningful time doing science, or understanding how science is done. This isn't "an alternative scientific view". It's just kooky opinions. https://x.com/atrupar/status/2083907234405269638?s=20

            npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            npars01@mstdn.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #35

            @SeanCasten

            RFK Jr has "Qrazie Ideas" yet is still supported by racist billionaires like Tim Mellon & Andrew Conru

            https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/business/economy/mellon-kennedy-childrens-health-defense.html

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jun/21/billionaire-tim-mellon-trump-donation

            https://robertreich.substack.com/p/why-timothy-mellon-is-the-poster

            RFK Jr serves the eugenicist agenda of the 1%

            https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/16/revealed-international-race-science-network-secretly-funded-by-us-tech-boss

            https://thecause.substack.com/p/how-eugenics-makes-sense-of-birtherism

            MAGA billionaires consider most of the world's population as "surplus to requirements". It's why they fund covid disinformation.
            https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/

            https://jacobin.com/2021/12/right-wing-think-tanks-herd-immunity-death

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/may/04/maga-soft-eugenics

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

              RFK Jr has no scientific training. He's a history major with a law degree who worked as an environmental advocate but has never spent any meaningful time doing science, or understanding how science is done. This isn't "an alternative scientific view". It's just kooky opinions. https://x.com/atrupar/status/2083907234405269638?s=20

              iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              iamnotu@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #36

              @SeanCasten i'll just say it: "FUCK RFK JR." a disgrace to his family and to every single individual with a slice of common sense.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • bluedot@left-bank.netB bluedot@left-bank.net

                @SeanCasten

                But he is also evil. He refuses to take responsibility for the harm his actions have done to other people, and that's a pretty good definition of evil.

                #RFK

                pattykimura@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                pattykimura@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                pattykimura@beige.party
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #37

                @BlueDot

                RFK Jr is a moral and intellectual coward. He actively and loudly pushes dangerous deadly conspiracies then actively and loudly denies he has any culpability for the predicted harm and death. Measles in Samoa.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

                  Not to be mean. But because all of those things do a better job of attuning the public to whatever he is about to say next. And it's the best way to ensure that the kooky shit he says doesn't get any more people killed. /fin

                  rahafjomah05@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rahafjomah05@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rahafjomah05@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #38

                  @SeanCasten I understand what you mean. I am from Gaza, and I have seen how the decisions and actions of people in power can affect ordinary lives in painful ways. Here, we live with immense suffering, uncertainty, and daily struggles just to survive. I hope the world pays more attention to the consequences of words and actions, because behind every crisis there are real people, families, and lives.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

                    And that's fine! If I'm on trial, I don't want a lawyer who is explaining that my alibi makes it 48% likely that I'm not guilty and depends substantially on the jury cherry picking data from the evidence presented even if that is factually true. 🙂

                    dredmorbius@toot.catD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dredmorbius@toot.catD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dredmorbius@toot.cat
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #39

                    @SeanCasten To go philosophical: science vs. law is, as I came to a belated realisation some years ago, dialectic vs. rhetoric.

                    Science seeks to arrive at truths and better understanding.

                    Lawyers and politicians often are acting to persuade and convince.

                    Realising the difference made many of my previous frustrations with online discussion clear: I was bringing a dialectical knife to a rhetorical gunfight.

                    Of course, at the time a lawyer I knew online piped up to contradict all of this, until I pointed out just what it was they were doing 😺

                    There are times you want someone powerfully persuasive running things. And there are times you want someone dead-set on finding truth.

                    RFK Jr. unfortunately seeks to persuade based on myths, falsehoods, and lies. As you note, wrong person for the job.

                    Oh, and title-expertise confusion is what that frequently-abused notion of "appeal to authority" is. Again, RFK Jr. is poster-child for that.

                    But philosophers vs. sophists? That's one long-lived battle.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

                      All this may sound very philosophical, but when you put true believers in charge of science, people die. If you think bad weather is caused by witches, people die. If you think AIDS is God bringing vengeance on the LGBT community, people die.

                      nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nini@oldbytes.space
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #40

                      @SeanCasten Dark Enlightenment stuff right there, an age of superstition and myths for those not special enough to be allowed knowledge.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • seancasten@mastodon.socialS seancasten@mastodon.social

                        RFK Jr has no scientific training. He's a history major with a law degree who worked as an environmental advocate but has never spent any meaningful time doing science, or understanding how science is done. This isn't "an alternative scientific view". It's just kooky opinions. https://x.com/atrupar/status/2083907234405269638?s=20

                        praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        praetor@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #41

                        @SeanCasten You shut your goddamned libtarded mouth! RFK is a REAL scientist! He has done meaning scientific work on raccoon dongs and dead whales.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • suneauken@mastodon.worldS suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper