Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
134 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

    People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

    O This user is from outside of this forum
    O This user is from outside of this forum
    ohildner@phpc.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #37

    @CiaraNi After my first interaction in a thread here i got accused by a random member of this community of being a bot trying to "astroturf" and got blocked afterwards.
    Did hurt me more than it should have to be honest.
    It's crazy and sad times we live in.

    ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

      People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

      kristinhenry@artatomic.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kristinhenry@artatomic.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kristinhenry@artatomic.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #38

      @CiaraNi fuck ai and this very violating of public life and art. It's obscene and abusive on all levels.

      ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • stekopf@mstdn.socialS stekopf@mstdn.social

        @CiaraNi

        So, you are not sure it is AI but state it as fact 🔝 nonetheless?

        @VerenaRupp

        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
        ciarani@mastodon.green
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #39

        @stekopf @VerenaRupp Everything points to it being AI (there are plausible reasons in the photo's thread and in this one.) I don't know how I can prove technically that it is not an AI image. A verified source for the actual photographer and original photo would prove it but nobody seems to have found one.

        How do we prove something is or isn't AI in the absence of an original source?

        Edit to add: I was sure. Until people started questioning me. Which made me unsure. This is the whole AI mess.

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

          @henryk @awws That's a plausible and likely analysis. And it's depressing that we are even in this situation, where people have to spend time and energy trying to work out what's likely and real in the first place.

          awws@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          awws@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          awws@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #40

          @CiaraNi @henryk Agreed. I don't know where people find the time or what exactly they get out of it doing it inside. Kinda sad, really.

          (though I guess there is also a part of me that *wanted* to believe someone had luckily caught a raindrop corwning a bird like that, cause it woulda been kinda awesome. 😊).

          ciarani@mastodon.greenC cppguy@infosec.spaceC 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • O ohildner@phpc.social

            @CiaraNi After my first interaction in a thread here i got accused by a random member of this community of being a bot trying to "astroturf" and got blocked afterwards.
            Did hurt me more than it should have to be honest.
            It's crazy and sad times we live in.

            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
            ciarani@mastodon.green
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #41

            @ohildner Agreed, it's sad. It's distressing. Every time we get burned by an AI deception, every time we feel manipulated. We are on alert, and sometimes we get it wrong - we believe AI-generated content is real; we believe human-made content is AI-generated. We end up bickering at one another while the AI-makers sit on their piles of cash laughing at us.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

              @GOKUSHRM Yes, agreed!

              gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gokushrm@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #42

              @CiaraNi one more thing I want to mention here that we can't not stop AI involvement in our daily life because soon everything will be run by AI. We could resist for some time. So enjoy the resistance.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                @Amorpheus @jwcph I think both parts are deception. Even without text explicitly claiming it was a photo, the person posting knows it is being presented as a photo and will be seen as a photo of a real moment in time.

                amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                amorpheus@kind.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #43

                @CiaraNi @jwcph True. Still, the impact of the actual lie carried significantly more weight to it than the image itself.

                I first just saw the image and thought... "this looks way to perfect". Then I read the text and went to "unbelievable... what are the odds for such an event". Now I am like... "the written word seems to have more impact on my plausibility control than my imagery vision".

                ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                  People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                  weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                  weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                  weirdmustard@flipping.rocks
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #44

                  @CiaraNi We've started seeing rare species being uploaded to iNaturalist and other citizen science platforms and then it turns out it's AI and I just don't see whyyyy people are doing that. Like No, your AI imagination of a rare insect isn't just as good as someone finding a living specimen, what do you mean. Who profits from that. Who wants to see a "photo" of a fake bird. What's going on.

                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC capnthommo@c.imC oisin@mastodon.ieO 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • amorpheus@kind.socialA amorpheus@kind.social

                    @CiaraNi @jwcph True. Still, the impact of the actual lie carried significantly more weight to it than the image itself.

                    I first just saw the image and thought... "this looks way to perfect". Then I read the text and went to "unbelievable... what are the odds for such an event". Now I am like... "the written word seems to have more impact on my plausibility control than my imagery vision".

                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ciarani@mastodon.green
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #45

                    @Amorpheus @jwcph Agreed. That's true. The use of text further manipulates us

                    jwcph@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • awws@mastodon.socialA awws@mastodon.social

                      @CiaraNi @henryk Agreed. I don't know where people find the time or what exactly they get out of it doing it inside. Kinda sad, really.

                      (though I guess there is also a part of me that *wanted* to believe someone had luckily caught a raindrop corwning a bird like that, cause it woulda been kinda awesome. 😊).

                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.green
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #46

                      @awws @henryk This is it, exactly. And there are so many genuinely amazing real images that are awesome. Which is what makes it all even worse. Human photographers feel insulted when people think their genuinely amazing images are AI. People doubt amazing images are real because they have been tricked before by other humans who pretend fake images are real. All the humans lose, except the ones making money off AI tools.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kristinhenry@artatomic.socialK kristinhenry@artatomic.social

                        @CiaraNi fuck ai and this very violating of public life and art. It's obscene and abusive on all levels.

                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ciarani@mastodon.green
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #47

                        @KristinHenry Agreed. It does feel violating. And humiliating, and insulting, and wearying. The way in which AI use and abuse and misuse leads to humans questioning each other, bickering with each other, makes it all even worse - violating of public life and art, yes.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW weirdmustard@flipping.rocks

                          @CiaraNi We've started seeing rare species being uploaded to iNaturalist and other citizen science platforms and then it turns out it's AI and I just don't see whyyyy people are doing that. Like No, your AI imagination of a rare insect isn't just as good as someone finding a living specimen, what do you mean. Who profits from that. Who wants to see a "photo" of a fake bird. What's going on.

                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                          ciarani@mastodon.green
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #48

                          @weirdmustard That's so depressing. And so 'unnecessary', for want of a better way to say it!

                          weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                            A few people have questioned whether I am right to say that the image of a drop of water bursting on a bird's head like a crown actually is AI-generated. They think I may be wrong. That it is not faked. That it is real.

                            If I'm wrong, if it really is an unmanipulated photo by a verified human photographer, please do let me know so that I can correct myself and my toot.

                            (All this uncertainty is part of the whole problem. We all spend so much human time & energy trying to act in good faith.)

                            geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geoffl@mastodon.me.uk
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #49

                            @CiaraNi I haven't seen the picture but water drops only form crowns when they hit a body of water, not when they hit a surface.

                            ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                              @weirdmustard That's so depressing. And so 'unnecessary', for want of a better way to say it!

                              weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                              weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                              weirdmustard@flipping.rocks
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #50

                              @CiaraNi People are spending quite some time on the community boards trying to figure out how to keep that stuff from destroying the usability of these platforms in scientific data sets. The goddamn time it takes just to prove that a "photo" is genAI. I mean even on your post ppl are like "Where's the proof?". It truly is all so unnecessary.

                              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG geoffl@mastodon.me.uk

                                @CiaraNi I haven't seen the picture but water drops only form crowns when they hit a body of water, not when they hit a surface.

                                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                ciarani@mastodon.green
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #51

                                @geoffl That's my understanding too.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                  A few people have questioned whether I am right to say that the image of a drop of water bursting on a bird's head like a crown actually is AI-generated. They think I may be wrong. That it is not faked. That it is real.

                                  If I'm wrong, if it really is an unmanipulated photo by a verified human photographer, please do let me know so that I can correct myself and my toot.

                                  (All this uncertainty is part of the whole problem. We all spend so much human time & energy trying to act in good faith.)

                                  retech@corteximplant.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  retech@corteximplant.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  retech@corteximplant.com
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #52

                                  @CiaraNi Breaking social trust is the entire point of these things. A society fragmented into infinitely smaller cells cannot fight back. And they cannot even know who is friend or foe. The high valuation of these corporations lay in the security they give one another to continue the Capitalism cancer ponzi scheme.

                                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW weirdmustard@flipping.rocks

                                    @CiaraNi People are spending quite some time on the community boards trying to figure out how to keep that stuff from destroying the usability of these platforms in scientific data sets. The goddamn time it takes just to prove that a "photo" is genAI. I mean even on your post ppl are like "Where's the proof?". It truly is all so unnecessary.

                                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ciarani@mastodon.green
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #53

                                    @weirdmustard Agreed. The amount of human time and energy wasted because of AI and the mistrust it has generated is shocking. It's wearying enough in a low-stakes discussion about a photo posted on a social media. It's terrible that it's threatening the credibility of scientific data, as well as draining scientists' time and trust and energy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • retech@corteximplant.comR retech@corteximplant.com

                                      @CiaraNi Breaking social trust is the entire point of these things. A society fragmented into infinitely smaller cells cannot fight back. And they cannot even know who is friend or foe. The high valuation of these corporations lay in the security they give one another to continue the Capitalism cancer ponzi scheme.

                                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ciarani@mastodon.green
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #54

                                      @retech Yes indeed

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                        People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                                        mary_amado92@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mary_amado92@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mary_amado92@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #55

                                        @CiaraNi Even AI thinks it's AI generated 😁

                                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mary_amado92@mastodon.socialM mary_amado92@mastodon.social

                                          @CiaraNi Even AI thinks it's AI generated 😁

                                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ciarani@mastodon.green
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #56

                                          @Mary_Amado92 What a vicious circle we're in!

                                          mary_amado92@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper