Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "Do you know for a fact that this amazing thing that was ostensibly 'done by an AI' isn't just YET ANOTHER FAKE?" and other questions that journalists find too spicy to ask

"Do you know for a fact that this amazing thing that was ostensibly 'done by an AI' isn't just YET ANOTHER FAKE?" and other questions that journalists find too spicy to ask

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
13 Indlæg 1 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

    That Tesla self-driving car demo video from like 2016

    The Google Gemini Demo video

    "ChatGPT can pass the bar exam"

    ^ These were all fakes, lies

    These AIs don't work, they're really bad, even at the basic stuff it's supposed to be good at like "summarizing documents"

    researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    researchfairy@scholar.social
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #3

    Idk about you

    But I'm starting to think that the next time someone says "look at the cool thing this AI did unaided"

    Maybe our default position should be

    "I don't believe you"

    "Prove it"

    "Extraordinary claims merit extraordinary scepticism"

    researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

      Idk about you

      But I'm starting to think that the next time someone says "look at the cool thing this AI did unaided"

      Maybe our default position should be

      "I don't believe you"

      "Prove it"

      "Extraordinary claims merit extraordinary scepticism"

      researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      researchfairy@scholar.social
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #4

      Next time a techbro tells you about his shiny new AI that does something impossibly cool

      researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

        Next time a techbro tells you about his shiny new AI that does something impossibly cool

        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        researchfairy@scholar.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #5

        tl;dr: Google Gemini video is a fake

        https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/12/24242897/google-gemini-unlists-misleading-video-ai

        researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

          tl;dr: Google Gemini video is a fake

          https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/12/24242897/google-gemini-unlists-misleading-video-ai

          researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          researchfairy@scholar.social
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #6

          The Tesla robots were being controlled remotely

          https://disconnect.blog/roundup-elon-musks-dream-of-robot-slaves-isnt-coming-soon/

          researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

            The Tesla robots were being controlled remotely

            https://disconnect.blog/roundup-elon-musks-dream-of-robot-slaves-isnt-coming-soon/

            researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            researchfairy@scholar.social
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #7

            Reminder that the Tesla "robots" are just remote controlled mannikins

            https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/10/reports-teslas-prototype-optimus-robots-were-controlled-by-humans/

            researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

              Reminder that the Tesla "robots" are just remote controlled mannikins

              https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/10/reports-teslas-prototype-optimus-robots-were-controlled-by-humans/

              researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              researchfairy@scholar.social
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #8

              Reminder that ChatGPT didn't ace the bar exam (old article I know)

              researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                Reminder that ChatGPT didn't ace the bar exam (old article I know)

                researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                researchfairy@scholar.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #9

                > Google faked Gemini AI output in Super Bowl ad

                https://www.theverge.com/news/608188/google-fake-gemini-ai-output-super-bowl

                New AI fakery in 2025

                researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                  > Google faked Gemini AI output in Super Bowl ad

                  https://www.theverge.com/news/608188/google-fake-gemini-ai-output-super-bowl

                  New AI fakery in 2025

                  researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  researchfairy@scholar.social
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  > Two biotechs say they’re using AI to conjure drugs from scratch. Their documents suggest otherwise

                  > Experts are skeptical of the grand claims of startups like Absci and Generate Biomedicines

                  https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/10/ai-drug-development-claims-by-biotech-companies-absci-generate-biomedicines-questioned/

                  researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                    > Two biotechs say they’re using AI to conjure drugs from scratch. Their documents suggest otherwise

                    > Experts are skeptical of the grand claims of startups like Absci and Generate Biomedicines

                    https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/10/ai-drug-development-claims-by-biotech-companies-absci-generate-biomedicines-questioned/

                    researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    researchfairy@scholar.social
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    Then:

                    > The paper said that after an AI tool was implemented at a large materials-science lab, researchers discovered significantly more materials—a result that suggested that, in certain settings, AI could substantially improve worker productivity

                    Now:

                    > MIT Says It No Longer Stands Behind Student’s AI Research Paper

                    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/mit-says-it-no-longer-stands-behind-student-s-ai-research-paper/ar-AA1EUFwO

                    its_a_fake.gif

                    researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                      Then:

                      > The paper said that after an AI tool was implemented at a large materials-science lab, researchers discovered significantly more materials—a result that suggested that, in certain settings, AI could substantially improve worker productivity

                      Now:

                      > MIT Says It No Longer Stands Behind Student’s AI Research Paper

                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/mit-says-it-no-longer-stands-behind-student-s-ai-research-paper/ar-AA1EUFwO

                      its_a_fake.gif

                      researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      researchfairy@scholar.social
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      Huh another AI fake

                      Almost like there's a pattern

                      researchfairy@scholar.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                        Huh another AI fake

                        Almost like there's a pattern

                        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        researchfairy@scholar.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        > The Editor has decided to retract this paper owing to concerns regarding discrepancies in the meta-analysis. These issues ultimately undermine the confidence the Editor can place in the validity of the analysis and resulting conclusions. The authors have not responded to correspondence regarding this retraction.

                        https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-07310-z

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper