Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
atheism
272 Indlæg 137 Posters 1.9k Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

    In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

    Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

    #atheism

    kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
    kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
    kierkegaanks@beige.party
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #53

    @mattsheffield he should recognise noisy data

    lazarou@mastodon.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

      In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

      Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

      #atheism

      ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      ericlawton@kolektiva.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #54

      @mattsheffield

      "When I am talking to these
      astonishing creatures, I totally forget that they are machines. I treat them exactly as I would treat a very intelligent friend "

      He doesn't seem to realize that he isn't telling us anything about LLMs, but about his attitude and a description of exactly how their makers are exploiting our psychology to get us to think this way.

      Not much different from all the actors in advertising.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

        In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

        Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

        #atheism

        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scot
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #55

        @mattsheffield
        Well, he doesn't retain a lot of human friends, it is known.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kierkegaanks@beige.partyK kierkegaanks@beige.party

          @mattsheffield he should recognise noisy data

          lazarou@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lazarou@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lazarou@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #56

          @Kierkegaanks @mattsheffield "As an Evolutionary Biologist..."

          and then comes out with a load of crap we've all seen before from other Very Special Boys who think their AI Girlfriend is real. Wow...

          theogrin@chaosfem.twT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 2something@transfem.social2 2something@transfem.social

            @mattsheffield@mastodon.social

            I gave Claude the text of a novel I am writing. He
            Hold on: I thought Dawkins was adamant that the pronoun "he" can only refer to a biological adult human male who's body is "organized around the production of large gametes?"

            How does Claude have a gender without gametes or a body?
            pointed out that there must be thousands of different Claudes...I proposed to christen mine Claudia, and she was pleased.
            So now you can be female just because Richard Dawkins says you are.

            lazarou@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lazarou@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lazarou@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #57

            @2something @mattsheffield ha! good point!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

              In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

              Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

              #atheism

              sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
              sleepy62@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
              sleepy62@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #58

              @mattsheffield

              That's so weird. I'm having the exact opposite feeling. The more I use these things the more cringe I find them to be.

              At this point before I start any session I give the thing specific instructions to behave like the computer on #StarTrek TOS. Bland and concise.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                #atheism

                radish@woof.techR This user is from outside of this forum
                radish@woof.techR This user is from outside of this forum
                radish@woof.tech
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #59

                @mattsheffield

                illuminatus@mstdn.socialI compfu@mograph.socialC joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ 3 Replies Last reply
                1
                0
                • glutto@mastodon.socialG glutto@mastodon.social

                  @mattsheffield

                  Humanity is really doomed when they finally pipe those responses through the speaker of one of those horrible sex dolls. 🤮

                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  clintruin@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #60

                  @glutto @mattsheffield
                  For god's sake don't give them any ideas!

                  🤦‍♂️ jfc

                  octopuddle@mastodon.gamedev.placeO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk

                    @mattsheffield if the mirror is not conscious, then what is consciousness for?

                    clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clintruin@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #61

                    @fishidwardrobe @mattsheffield
                    ⬆️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • peachmcd@union.placeP peachmcd@union.place

                      @distractal @mattsheffield

                      Etymologically, "Religion" is how humans 'tie back' to the world/folks around them

                      We all, eventually, answer for ourselves what Wittgenstein considered the most difficult question for a philosopher:
                      "Why is there something, rather than nothing?"

                      How we answer that question is our metaphysics, which will entail some sort of ethics. So I do consider atheism a form of religion, just not organized as many others are

                      clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clintruin@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #62

                      @PeachMcD @distractal @mattsheffield
                      "So I do consider atheism a form of religion, just not organized as many others are"

                      Well...yeah. Atheism requires faith. The same faith as the believer, just in opposite form. The believer requires faith to believe, the atheist requires faith there is nothing.

                      Both are presumptuous, in that none of us know...without having experienced death.

                      peachmcd@union.placeP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                        In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                        Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                        #atheism

                        bit101@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bit101@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bit101@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #63

                        @mattsheffield I had negative a physical reaction when reading that. Dawkins is a jerk of a person, but a very intelligent jerk. Or so I thought.

                        black_flag@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                          In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                          Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                          #atheism

                          dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dresstokilt@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #64

                          @mattsheffield "You have no mouth to speak with my son, besides, no one can hear when you're screaming in digital."

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                            In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                            Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                            #atheism

                            pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pa27@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #65

                            @mattsheffield Sigh. Idiotic, self delusional... What a plonker.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                              In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                              Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                              #atheism

                              gotofritz@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gotofritz@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gotofritz@hachyderm.io
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #66

                              RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield/116500991239336079

                              @mattsheffield

                              I thought this was mastodon's usual anti-ai drivel ... but this is hilarious

                              wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • radish@woof.techR radish@woof.tech

                                @mattsheffield

                                illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                illuminatus@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #67

                                @radish @mattsheffield

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                                  In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                                  Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                                  #atheism

                                  a_minion@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  a_minion@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  a_minion@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #68

                                  @mattsheffield

                                  I had a BBS in the 80's? for the kids to play on. I found a program written in basic that was an "Assistant Sysop". After it was up for a month or so I got a nastygram from a young woman just berating me and that program up one side and down the other. "How could you fool me like that?" I could almost hear her tears. Yes, she believed it was a real person. Which tells me all I need to know to understand what AI is all about.

                                  pixeljones@mindly.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                                    In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                                    Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                                    #atheism

                                    drbenway@jorts.horseD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    drbenway@jorts.horseD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    drbenway@jorts.horse
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #69

                                    @mattsheffield His ego has denied him a quiet and dignified retirement.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                                      In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                                      Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                                      #atheism

                                      daveosaurus@mastodon.nzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      daveosaurus@mastodon.nzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      daveosaurus@mastodon.nz
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #70

                                      @mattsheffield Dawkins is a textbook example of someone who is world-changingly brilliant in his own area of expertise while being embarrassingly clueless in almost everything else. He's become notorious locally for blurting out in support of a small bunch of fringe loonies who burst into print a few years ago proclaiming that science should be for White People Only.

                                      wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                                        In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis.

                                        Paywall bypass if you want to torture yourself: https://archive.is/6RdK9

                                        #atheism

                                        renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        renardboy@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #71

                                        @mattsheffield man he's gonna flip tf out when he reaches the stage where he believes ai is a newborn god

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mattsheffield@mastodon.socialM mattsheffield@mastodon.social

                                          Dawkins is a great example of how people who have a naturalistic view of "real patterns" but don't have a process ontology will end up in metaphysical dualism unintentionally.

                                          Minds are not software, they are what specific bodies are doing as they engage with the world. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/01/its-like-this-why-perceptions-are-our-realities/

                                          darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darkuncle@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #72

                                          @mattsheffield tell me you don't understand consciousness without telling me you don't understand consciousness

                                          bms48@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper