Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 6 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
    michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
    michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #29

    @Kiloku @sundogplanets

    SpaceX's hype has never been constrained by facts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

      nev@flipping.rocksN This user is from outside of this forum
      nev@flipping.rocksN This user is from outside of this forum
      nev@flipping.rocks
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #30

      @sundogplanets it's incredibly embarrassing and pathetic that a lot of the techie sorts with access to power now are people who…like I say, there's no such thing as reading too much science fiction, but there IS such a thing as reading too LITTLE stuff that ISN'T science fiction.

      mkj@social.mkj.earthM G 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cy@fedicy.us.toC cy@fedicy.us.to
        Not enough cover. Build it on a pickup truck!

        CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kwayk42@sechtor.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #31

        @cy @sundogplanets I mean if I'm in international waters with a gun powerful enough to shoot down satellites, I'm pretty sure I'll be good

        cy@fedicy.us.toC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

          Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

          mariyadelano@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          mariyadelano@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          mariyadelano@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #32

          @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social this rec made me happy to see because it’s published by Hachette (where I work) and I just got a copy from the office to gift to a family member who’s been a bit too AI-optimistic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

            Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

            heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            heymarkreeves@mstdn.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #33

            @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social 💯

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              alephwyr@chitter.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
              alephwyr@chitter.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
              alephwyr@chitter.xyz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #34

              @sundogplanets Hell is not below the earth

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                quinn9282@mas.toQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quinn9282@mas.toQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quinn9282@mas.to
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #35

                @sundogplanets Other than the obvious, how on earth are you supposed to be able to maneuver such a large number of satellites in extremely close proximity in orbit to prevent them from colliding with each other or anything else at all? With that number of satellites, even if just one collision were to occur at some point, it would be beyond disastrous (at worse, we'd have like many thousands of satellites/junk concurrently raining down into Earth kinda thing).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                  @cy @sundogplanets I mean if I'm in international waters with a gun powerful enough to shoot down satellites, I'm pretty sure I'll be good

                  cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cy@fedicy.us.to
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #36
                  Entire US navy vs 1 boat boi with a wave motion gun
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS schrotthaufen@mastodon.social

                    @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                    riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    riaresists@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #37

                    @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets
                    Elon paid for it so…
                    #ImpeachTheGQP

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                      bjn@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bjn@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bjn@mstdn.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #38

                      @sundogplanets Orbiting data centres are stupid for a huge range of reasons, not the least powering them, cooling them and fixing them. Just another idiotic idea from Musk (Optimius, Cybertruck, The Boring Company, “Full” self driving, etc….).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nev@flipping.rocksN nev@flipping.rocks

                        @sundogplanets it's incredibly embarrassing and pathetic that a lot of the techie sorts with access to power now are people who…like I say, there's no such thing as reading too much science fiction, but there IS such a thing as reading too LITTLE stuff that ISN'T science fiction.

                        mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mkj@social.mkj.earth
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #39

                        @nev Or when you're reading science fiction which was intended to be a warning, and treating it as something that should be done because it's Cool™!

                        "I have read Do Not Build The Torment Nexus and decided to dedicate the rest of my life to ensuring that we *never* have a Torment Nexus" said no billionaire ever.

                        @sundogplanets

                        nev@flipping.rocksN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mycotropic@beige.party
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #40

                          @sundogplanets

                          “Orbital data centers are the most efficient way to meet the accelerating demand for AI computing power,”

                          Demand isn't accelerating, you're forcing it on everyone you assholes!! We can't NOT use it when you make it an integral part of every product you sell ASSHOLES!

                          oblomov@sociale.networkO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                            hattom@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hattom@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hattom@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #41

                            @sundogplanets my condolences. The moment I saw this story, my thoughts were with you.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                              @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                              The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

                              Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

                              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mycotropic@beige.party
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #42

                              @angelastella @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                              That's the plot of #Seveneves
                              https://www.nealstephenson.com/seveneves.html

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                                @sundogplanets

                                “Orbital data centers are the most efficient way to meet the accelerating demand for AI computing power,”

                                Demand isn't accelerating, you're forcing it on everyone you assholes!! We can't NOT use it when you make it an integral part of every product you sell ASSHOLES!

                                oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oblomov@sociale.network
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #43

                                @mycotropic @sundogplanets and orbital days centers are a horrible idea

                                cdunnpasadena@sfba.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #44

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  The Kardashev "levels" are pure fantasy, not even good SF.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cresssalad@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #45

                                    @sundogplanets I am fine with this, not because I am happy with having our eternal view of the heavens f*cked up by stinking billionaires and impotent regulation, but because this situation is unmanageable from a physics and mechanics perspective. If all the operators in this sector do this then when 1 sat fails its going to be a big issue. It will make orbital space unaccessible which to me is better as it forces us to show respect and consideration!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                                      Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                                      palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      palmandneedle@norden.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #46

                                      @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

                                      deborahh@cosocial.caD ehproque@neopaquita.esE 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                                        Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                                        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isaackuo@spacey.space
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #47

                                        @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social I have three non-techbro mentality/religion reasons for this:

                                        1) Distract from Tesla's poor earnings
                                        2) Distract from the Epstein files
                                        3) Bezos says he's going to launch zillions of data center satellites so Musk just wants to nab scamee money for it first

                                        But yeah, also Musk is a moron.

                                        edelruth@mastodon.onlineE anniebuddy@mstdn.caA 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                          jqmcd@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jqmcd@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jqmcd@sfba.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #48

                                          @sundogplanets Skynet

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper