Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 3 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS espanabizarra@mastodon.socialE pthenq1@mastodon.laP spycrab@kolektiva.socialS mkj@social.mkj.earthM 96 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

      rootwyrm@weird.autosR schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS jakebrake@ohai.socialJ nev@flipping.rocksN 30 Replies Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

        espanabizarra@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        espanabizarra@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        espanabizarra@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @sundogplanets So now Musk wants to jump in the data center wagon, so he can get VC funding. Too late, that bubble will burst this very same year.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

          pthenq1@mastodon.laP This user is from outside of this forum
          pthenq1@mastodon.laP This user is from outside of this forum
          pthenq1@mastodon.la
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @sundogplanets
          For the data centers.

          They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

          Earth will have a ring

          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dougwade@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
            dougwade@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
            dougwade@mastodon.xyz
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              grb090423@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @CStamp @sundogplanets

              This!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                spycrab@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @sundogplanets need more deorbit star link propaganda

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earth
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                  Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                  I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spycrab@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                    kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkj@social.mkj.earth
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @kwayk42 Nudge one a kilometer off position and hello our old friend Kessler.

                      @sundogplanets

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • spycrab@kolektiva.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.social

                        @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwayk42@sechtor.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #11

                        @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                        #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                        superball@norcal.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.socialS S 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • pthenq1@mastodon.laP pthenq1@mastodon.la

                          @sundogplanets
                          For the data centers.

                          They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

                          Earth will have a ring

                          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                          angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #12

                          @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                          The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

                          Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

                          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mkj@social.mkj.earthM mkj@social.mkj.earth

                            @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                            Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                            I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkj@social.mkj.earth
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #13

                            I really can't help but feel that someone, somewhere, saw the term "megaconstellation" and said "let's have an *actual* mega-constellation!"

                            @sundogplanets

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                              THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rootwyrm@weird.autos
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #14

                              @sundogplanets I would ask if you were fucking serious and why the FCC hasn't thrown it out, but calling the people left there "clownshoes" is an unforgivable insult to the footwear of professional entertainers.

                              Also, worth noting, that isn't even fucking *ZERO* on the Kardashev because that's not even a goddamn relevant scale. Please somebody start fucking executing these techbro oligarchs to save the rest of us.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hfinyow@mstdn.ca
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #15

                                @sundogplanets at this number of satellites, we're in the domain where the Russians and Chinese might start shooting them down as they would take up orbital real estate for their own networks to compete with Starlink

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                  @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                  #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                  superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  superball@norcal.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #16

                                  @kwayk42 🤭🤍

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #17

                                    @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF riaresists@mastodon.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS schrotthaufen@mastodon.social

                                      @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #18

                                      @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets 😭🤬

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #19

                                        @CStamp @sundogplanets

                                        "Because FUCK the rest of the world" - USA

                                        (Always has been)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                          @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                          #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          spycrab@kolektiva.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #20

                                          @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets if you shoot them they become a hazard for everything up there.

                                          What's worse than a million starlinks
                                          Several billion in trackable small starlinks

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper