Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 7 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
    skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
    skjeggtroll@mastodon.online
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #54

    @sundogplanets

    "From the vanity of the tech-bros who've read science-fiction but not understood it, O Lord, deliver us."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      nurglerider@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nurglerider@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nurglerider@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #55

      @sundogplanets This is just a VC scam.
      1. The timeline on launching a million satellites, even "small" ones is decades.

      2. Near vacuum isn't a magical environment for heat management.

      3. Power from where exactly? And don't say sunlight cause the amount of capture panels needed would be an order of magnitude more material to power a data center.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

        countmoosferatu@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        countmoosferatu@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        countmoosferatu@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #56

        @sundogplanets Bye, nice telescope views, etc. Hello, Kessler syndrome.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

          teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
          teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
          teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafe
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #57
          I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

          IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
          ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
            w6kme@mastodon.radio
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #58

            @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              buckrogers1965@techhub.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              buckrogers1965@techhub.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              buckrogers1965@techhub.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #59

              @sundogplanets

              That would disintegrate into shrapnel in days.

              The Kessler syndrome, also known as the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading, or ablation cascade, is a scenario proposed by NASA scientists Donald J. Kessler and Burton G. Cour-Palais in 1978. It describes a situation in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) becomes so high due to space pollution that collisions between these objects cascade, exponentially increasing the amount of space debris over time.[3] This proliferation
              ...

              collisions would accumulate faster than atmospheric drag could remove them.[4] The Kessler syndrome underscores the critical need for effective space traffic management and collision avoidance strategies to ensure the long-term viability of space exploration and use.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome#:~:text=The%20theoretical%20cascading%20Kessler%20syndrome,Starlink%2C%20the%20constellation%20of%20SpaceX.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • palmandneedle@norden.socialP palmandneedle@norden.social

                @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

                deborahh@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                deborahh@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                deborahh@cosocial.ca
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #60

                @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets I think I've read that, ages ago. Time for a reread, maybe! My library has it online.

                palmandneedle@norden.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #61

                  @sundogplanets

                  If you understand anything about the giant CF of data centers right now this is just the stupidest idea ever.

                  First, the lifespan of these chips runs on the order of 18 months before they are considered obsolete and the chips fry very quickly so there is a very high failure rate.

                  Also, the data centers power is determined by the networking of all the components in the data center.

                  Ask yourself if RF communication broadcast between satellites can work like wires

                  ids1024@mathstodon.xyzI zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #62

                    @sundogplanets

                    Well, yeah, the idea of just you know oh we’re going to now reach this science fiction milestone because reasons.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • w6kme@mastodon.radioW w6kme@mastodon.radio

                      @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #63

                      @W6KME @sundogplanets

                      Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                      w6kme@mastodon.radioW clintruin@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jplebreton@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #64

                        @sundogplanets the performance of total seriousness, no matter how absurd the goal, is critical to tech oligarchs' "fake it til you rule the world" strategy. it rarely survives contact with reality but the damage it does is of course very real.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #65

                          @sundogplanets Sounds like they used AI to generate this. The Kardashev scale is a classification of _civilization_, not "situation". I see this sort of auto-correct in lots of AI slop.

                          Recent news articles kept referring to Tom Human as the Border Guard.

                          If this wasn't so serious, I'd laugh.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                            @W6KME @sundogplanets

                            Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
                            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
                            w6kme@mastodon.radio
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #66

                            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets SpaceX's unwillingness to be good citizens, and the US government's unwillingness to do anything about it...people are going to die eventually, and possibly a lot of them.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #67

                              @sundogplanets

                              What people should suggest is that Elon Musk personally move himself into space to oversee the development of his glorious satellite network.

                              By all means, we should hurry him to the asteroid belt personally so he can collect the raw materials and then fashion the satellites. Tell him it will cut launch cost costs.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #68

                                @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets

                                A rail gun is completely unnecessary. As a scientist pointed out back in the good old Ronnie Reagan, Star Wars days. The way you defeat a network of satellites is to throw a bucket of sand into the right orbit.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                  @W6KME @sundogplanets

                                  Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  clintruin@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #69

                                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @W6KME @sundogplanets
                                  Let's remember who we're talking about here...
                                  ☠️
                                  https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/115989156933538439

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                                    Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                                    benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benjaminklein@mastodon.nu
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #70

                                    @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social brilliant book and well worth the read. Every time I hear someone mentioning one of these tech bros being intelligent I want a copy to throw at their head. Maybe we need to start explaining to politicians that if LEO is a shooting gallery it means no more GPS, do they remember what it was like navigating the world with paper maps, because we are going back there.

                                    ericfielding@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafeT teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafe
                                      I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

                                      IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
                                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #71

                                      @teajaygrey @sundogplanets the cost of the fibre link is not mainly about the physical cable. The thing that takes time and money is getting permits for digging up roads, access through private fields, planning permission for connection points, and so on. And each new route of cable has to have this sorted from scratch, and some public authorities are slow, obstructive or just downright awkward.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netraven@hear-me.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #72

                                        @sundogplanets I’m (jokingly) pretty sure aliens are behind this stupidity. Why else would we be purposely stranding ourselves on this planet by filling up the sky with space junk?

                                        Oh right, because we can…

                                        Times like these I like to disassociate much more hilarious reasons than what reality actually offers, as to why things they way they are. Today it’s aliens, tomorrow? Tardigrades maybe.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          netraven@hear-me.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #73

                                          @sundogplanets god damn cardassians!!!!! /s

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper